Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumzebonaut
(3,688 posts)Would we expect any different from Hillary
highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)bbgrunt
(5,281 posts)highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)Why something like this doesn't simply invalidate any Clinton candidacy as far as Democrats are concerned beats the hell out of me.
bbgrunt
(5,281 posts)disgust with the whole process these days. House of Cards is not fiction.
revbones
(3,660 posts)*sigh*
Nitram
(22,671 posts)...allow smart gun regulation, support affirmative action, turn down bogus stratagems to prohibit abortion, etc, etc. Garland is a good man, an excellent judge, and the right man for the job right now.The Senate actually does have to approve Obama's pick, you know. Start looking at the world through the lens of reality, stop chasing unicorns.
bbgrunt
(5,281 posts)No one is talking about a far left judge, just one who will uphold basic democratic principles like habeas corpus and getting rid of Citizen's United. As far as women's reproductive health he's a total unknown.
Nitram
(22,671 posts)overturning Citizens United. I think you forgot the joker thingie.
nichomachus
(12,754 posts)people on the left would be bitching and moaning about Garland. Instead, everyone wants to see him get the job. Brilliant move all around. You'd almost think it was planned this way. "Oh, please, please, appoint the corporatist judge. Please."