Video & Multimedia

rsacamano

(1,908 posts) Thu Jan 30, 2020, 10:32 AM Jan 2020

BREAKING: Republicans Don't Have Votes to Block Impeachment Witnesses

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

BREAKING: Republicans Don't Have Votes to Block Impeachment Witnesses (Original Post) rsacamano Jan 2020 OP

On the brink empedocles Jan 2020 #1

It's Pakman opining and reading from news feeds. Eyeball_Kid Jan 2020 #2

Pakman is ALWAYS LATE Watchfoxheadexplodes Jan 2020 #3

Thanks for the pakman warning Fullduplexxx Jan 2020 #5

Ho-hum! He's such a pre-canned late-coming clickbait horse. NurseJackie Jan 2020 #7

Outdated DarthDem Jan 2020 #4

Wanna' bet? SergeStorms Jan 2020 #6

empedocles

(15,751 posts)

1. On the brink

Reply to rsacamano (Original post)

Thu Jan 30, 2020, 10:39 AM

Jan 2020

Eyeball_Kid

(7,430 posts)

2. It's Pakman opining and reading from news feeds.

Reply to rsacamano (Original post)

Thu Jan 30, 2020, 10:39 AM

Jan 2020

He has NO new information.

This is NOT "Breaking" news.

Watchfoxheadexplodes

(3,496 posts)

3. Pakman is ALWAYS LATE

Reply to Eyeball_Kid (Reply #2)

Thu Jan 30, 2020, 10:40 AM

Jan 2020

Unless it's a Biden hit piece.

Fullduplexxx

(7,851 posts)

5. Thanks for the pakman warning

Reply to Eyeball_Kid (Reply #2)

Thu Jan 30, 2020, 11:16 AM

Jan 2020

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)

7. Ho-hum! He's such a pre-canned late-coming clickbait horse.

Reply to Eyeball_Kid (Reply #2)

Fri Jan 31, 2020, 08:00 AM

Jan 2020

DarthDem

(5,255 posts)

4. Outdated

Reply to rsacamano (Original post)

Thu Jan 30, 2020, 11:10 AM

Jan 2020

And neglects to account for standard GOP vote-gathering tactics. Sens. Coliins, Murkowksi et al. will frown and look concerned and then claim that the Democrats didn't prove their case or some such nonsense, so witnesses would be a "waste of the Senate's time."

SergeStorms

(19,190 posts)

6. Wanna' bet?

Reply to rsacamano (Original post)

Thu Jan 30, 2020, 10:32 PM

Jan 2020

Reply to this discussion