Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumDid Michael Savage just apologize for America?
Hmm. for all the screaming and yelling on the right about "OBAMA APOLOGIZED FOR AMERICA!!!!!" you'll never hear Michael Savage being dissed for expressing nearly the same thing. From the end of the 1st hour of Friday's The Savage Nation (transcript after the embedded clip, segment begins at 34:20):
Liberals, please wake up. What has to happen for you to understand that it's time to pull out of the Middle East and let them have it. You say, "but we need their oil!" We actually don't need their oil. We don't really need their oil. Open up the Keystone XL pipeline, start drilling off the coast of California and Alaska...
(the transcript is of the segment I heard live between the end of the PBS NewsHour and a local news bulletin from my NPR station since I wanted to peek at right wing radio. On youtube you can hear the context of this snippet. Savage ended the hour by ranting about the need for local oil production and said that Romney failed to discuss oil drilling because of his weak, pro Obama advisers.)
And I guess of course because the Obama administration is carrying out the military action in the Middle East right now, Savage directed his question about the US intervention to "liberals". As you can see in the beginning of the following clip from his short-lived MSNBC show (yes, MSNBC once did a weekend TV version of The Savage Nation in the first half of 2003 as America went to war), Savage called Bush "100% right" for starting the Iraq War:
Media Matters reported in 2006 that Savage once analogized the Rudyard Kipling poem "White Man's Burden" to the Iraq War, but in 2011, Savage admitted that the US never should have gone to war in Iraq. A freeper thread "Dead Wrong on Iraq War - An Open Letter to Michael Savage" attacked Savage in 2008 for being critical of America's wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Major Nikon
(36,818 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Jack Rabbit
(45,984 posts)The private Michael Savage may be more pensive than his radio persona. He reads Plato and can actually discuss his works intelligently.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Jack Rabbit
(45,984 posts)But yeah, that's a possibility.
Of course, one certainly can be opposed to democracy and read Plato. After all, Plato was hardly Tom Paine. But I can't imagine some one who is actually as enthralled with The Republic as Savage seems to be could be the kind of knuckledragger that Savage pretends to be.
For your viewing pleasure . . .
[center]
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)....if all you care about is your own pocket and you admire manipulation and spin.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)And if we don't end all of those satanic things, we will not survive as a nation. Or some rot like that.