Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Are you geek enough to understand these jokes? (Original Post) seaglass Jun 2014 OP
I got them all except #4 and #13. ManiacJoe Jun 2014 #1
#4 and #13 Ron Obvious Jun 2014 #4
I got every one of them Ron Obvious Jun 2014 #2
You win - and your prize is that you get to explain them all. Or at least say which one seaglass Jun 2014 #3
I made a crack at explaining 4 and 13 in the previous post Ron Obvious Jun 2014 #5
Yes, 19 was one of the ones I understood and was amused by. :-) seaglass Jun 2014 #6
Wouldn't it be programmers who mix up Halloween and Christmas? jmowreader Jun 2014 #7
Engineers more often work in different numerical systems csziggy Jun 2014 #8
A programmer is playing hide and seek with their child whistler162 Jun 2014 #9
OMG - I just got #7 - I knew it couldn't be THAT hard... lol seaglass Jun 2014 #10
20 for 20. hobbit709 Jun 2014 #11
Nope, I'm not geek enough sakabatou Jun 2014 #12
LOLOL! BlancheSplanchnik Jun 2014 #13
 

Ron Obvious

(6,261 posts)
4. #4 and #13
Wed Jun 11, 2014, 10:33 AM
Jun 2014

#4 In metric, kilogrammes are a unit of mass, but Newtons are a unit of weight (i.e. mass multiplied by the gravitational constant). Pascals are units of pressure, i.e. weight per area. So a Pascal is defined as a Newton per square meter.

#13 Heisenberg was a quantum physicist, which area of physics deal with subatomic phenomena which don't appear to obey the ordinary laws of physics that apply to the larger macro world. Rather than dealing with absolute positions, quantum physics usually involve probabilities. In particular, it appears the more is known about the position of a subatomic particle, the less is known about its momentum and vice versa. This is roughly summarised as the "uncertainty principle".

Goedel most well-known for his "incompleteness theory". The first incompleteness theorem states that for any self-consistent recursive axiomatic system powerful enough to describe the arithmetic of the natural numbers (for example Peano arithmetic), there are true propositions about the naturals that cannot be proved from the axioms. (Sorry, I took that one straight from Wikipedia)

Chomsky is, of course, a linguist.

I bet you're slapping your knees now that I've explained them

 

Ron Obvious

(6,261 posts)
2. I got every one of them
Wed Jun 11, 2014, 09:47 AM
Jun 2014

Whether that's something to be proud or ashamed of, I will leave as an exercise to the reader.

At least I don't snort when I laugh...

seaglass

(8,171 posts)
3. You win - and your prize is that you get to explain them all. Or at least say which one
Wed Jun 11, 2014, 09:57 AM
Jun 2014

you thought was the funniest and why.

 

Ron Obvious

(6,261 posts)
5. I made a crack at explaining 4 and 13 in the previous post
Wed Jun 11, 2014, 10:41 AM
Jun 2014

Being a programmer, I naturally gravitated to the extreme literalness of #19:

Something like, "go to the store and pick up a loaf of bread. If they have eggs, pick up a dozen." This shows the difference between how extremely literal computers interpret our ambiguous language and how humans do.

To a computer, that would read:

Go to store
If they have eggs
then pick up a dozen loafs of bread
else
pick up just a single loaf of bread

Since it was never specified to get eggs, the presence of eggs was merely a condition to indicate how many loafs of bread to get.

We programmers are extremely literal. Here's another one:

A programmer was found dead in his shower. In his hand was found a shampoo bottle with the instructions:

Shampoo; rinse; repeat

To a programmer that's a never-ending loop, and you'd never stop shampooing.


seaglass

(8,171 posts)
6. Yes, 19 was one of the ones I understood and was amused by. :-)
Wed Jun 11, 2014, 10:52 AM
Jun 2014

I did a very little script writing/programming when I was younger.

 

whistler162

(11,155 posts)
9. A programmer is playing hide and seek with their child
Sat Jun 14, 2014, 01:36 PM
Jun 2014

the programmer is it so must count to 100. Closing their eyes tightly they start counting 1...2...3...4 and open their eyes.

seaglass

(8,171 posts)
10. OMG - I just got #7 - I knew it couldn't be THAT hard... lol
Sat Jun 14, 2014, 01:44 PM
Jun 2014

On edit: I totally wasn't thinking that the 2 fingers were next to each other. Until I actually did it. I would say that is my a.) lack of common sense or b.) out of the box thinking

Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»Are you geek enough to un...