The DU Lounge
Related: Culture Forums, Support ForumsWhen America Came 'This Close' to Establishing a 30-Hour Workweek
Interesting that even though Congress overturned the Senate's decision to pass the Black-Connery bill in 1933, which would've established a 6-hour work day/30-hour work week, some businesses, including Kellog, implemented a 6-hour work day anyway and saw improvements in productivity and, naturally, reductions in unemployment. Kellog didn't fully phase out the shorter work day until the mid-1980s. It'd be nice if companies started bringing it back. The deciding factro, as the article notes in Kellogg's case, is the cost of benefits to so many additional employees. Could there be a way to work this out? Inverted income tax for example? Basic Income? With corporate profits so high, couldn't it still be feasible to take on more workers while reducing our work day, the top CEOs' salaries not withstanding?
http://www.alternet.org/labor/when-america-came-close-establishing-30-hour-workweek
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)Of course we could do it if we wanted to.
TheGoodNews
(48 posts)That's the thing. How do we make this a more viable movement? We have the fight for a $15 minimum wage and collective bargaining rights for some workers, but very, very few if any are campaigning for fewer hours. How do we change that? Propose an amendment to the Fair Labor Standards Act? Introduce a new version of the Black-Connery bill?
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)That sounds crazy, I know, but the opposite is in place now.
People can't get health benefits or assistance for part time jobs, and are paid more for overtime.
Maybe a business should have to show cause for allowing more than 35 or 40 hours and be prevented from paying more money for those overtime hours.