Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

California

Ernesto

(5,077 posts) Wed Aug 24, 2016, 01:48 PM Aug 2016

0

PG&E should pay for San Bruno fire!

http://www.presstelegram.com/opinion/20160822/who-will-pay-for-utilitys-crimes-thomas-elias

2 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

PG&E should pay for San Bruno fire! (Original Post) Ernesto Aug 2016 OP

PGE's civil case settlement of about $720 paid to the 501 victim plaintiffs seems low as well. SunSeeker Aug 2016 #1

PG&E's shareholders should pay for San Bruno fire! KamaAina Aug 2016 #2

SunSeeker

(51,523 posts)

1. PGE's civil case settlement of about $720 paid to the 501 victim plaintiffs seems low as well.

Reply to Ernesto (Original post)

Wed Aug 24, 2016, 02:18 PM

Aug 2016

http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2013/09/10/pge-to-pay-565m-in-settlements-over-san-bruno-pipeline-explosion/

http://m.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/PG-E-settles-more-San-Bruno-suits-3742194.php

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)

2. PG&E's shareholders should pay for San Bruno fire!

Reply to Ernesto (Original post)

Wed Aug 24, 2016, 03:53 PM

Aug 2016

There. I fixed it for you. Without that addendum, they'd pay, all right -- but then double our rates.

Reply to this discussion

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»California»PG&E should pay for San B...