Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
Fri Jun 20, 2014, 11:56 AM Jun 2014

State Lawmakers OK 25 MPH Speed Limit For NYC

NEW YORK (CBSNewYork/AP) – New York state lawmakers have voted to let New York City lower its citywide speed limit to 25 miles per hour.

The state Assembly approved the city’s request late Thursday and the Senate followed suit early Friday morning as the Legislature worked to adjourn their six-month session.

The city’s speed limit is now 30 miles per hour. Mayor Bill de Blasio had sought the state’s permission to lower it by 5 miles per hour as part of a traffic safety campaign.

http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2014/06/20/state-lawmakers-ok-25-mph-speed-limit-for-nyc/

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
2. pedestrian deaths have been going up in NYC, and you think this is just about tickets?
Fri Jun 20, 2014, 12:00 PM
Jun 2014

if someone is speeding in the city, they should be ticketed.

jeez. nice progressive support for pedestrian safety there.



madaboutharry

(40,190 posts)
4. No, I do not think it is just about tickets.
Fri Jun 20, 2014, 12:07 PM
Jun 2014

Not every single comment here on DU has to be serious. It is true that there will be more tickets. My comment had nothing to do with not supporting pedestrian safety. WTF right back at you.

Ikonoklast

(23,973 posts)
5. This will do nothing to contribute to pedestrian safety.
Fri Jun 20, 2014, 12:36 PM
Jun 2014

When politicians blame speed as the problem, they ignore other contributing factors that are just as deadly, bad or confusing signage, poorly marked intersections, confusing and poorly timed traffic control devices.

It costs money to fix those problems. It's the only reason they don't get fixed.


I would venture that when speed is the over-riding factor in a vehicle/pedestrian accident, that car was going way more than 30mph.

So, yes, it is somewhat about revenue as that too will also new be a result of the new lower limit, and politicians are well aware of that side effect.

There have been more than one instance where lowering speed limits actually increased accident rates, it is by far not a panacea.

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
6. apparently you think that a person doesn't get hit harder when the car is going faster
Fri Jun 20, 2014, 01:14 PM
Jun 2014


and apparently you think that a car moving faster is just as able to stop in time for a pedestrian than one moving slower.

Ikonoklast

(23,973 posts)
7. It's not what I think at all, but what traffic safety professionals write about all the time.
Fri Jun 20, 2014, 01:24 PM
Jun 2014

Re-read what I posted about when speed *is* a factor, the vehicle is usually far over the posted limit by a large fraction.

That speed limit sign stopped nothing bad from happening.

There is a ton of traffic study stuff out there that addresses this type of problem, easily researched on the USDOT website.

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
8. you don't even seem to know what you're arguing for or against
Fri Jun 20, 2014, 01:31 PM
Jun 2014

you're almost making an argument similar to those made against gun control.

"well, they're speeding anyway, so lowering the speed limit won't do any good."

you're acknowledging, as experts do, that speed is an issue and that speeds must be reduced.

the speed limit is just one aspect, but it is an important one.

Ikonoklast

(23,973 posts)
9. Uh..it's not my argument. It's the one used by people that do this type of thing for a living.
Fri Jun 20, 2014, 04:18 PM
Jun 2014

I defer to their expertise in transportation safety studies authorized by both government and private institutions (insurance groups, universities, safety foundations, etc.).


The report issued by the NYC DOT itself stated that the number one cause of these type of accidents was driver inattention, followed by failure to yield.

Most of those type of accidents occur when the vehicle is in the act of turning, not speeding, or when a pedestrian is already in a crosswalk.

Speeding was not listed as the primary cause at all. Reducing the speed limit is a reaction, not a solution.

Explain to me how lowering the speed limit fixes or lessens those two primary reasons for accidents. It may ameliorate deleterious effects when it is a contributing factor, but it does nothing to prevent the vast majority of this type of accident.


But politicians saw it as 'doing something'. Too bad it's the wrong thing.



Latest Discussions»Region Forums»New York»State Lawmakers OK 25 MPH...