And not knowing is also harmful because teachers may need to reapply to the new Charter District or to another school district in order to maintain their income livelihood and responsibility to the Teacher Retirement of Texas. What has the charter committee offered as a continuing retirement venue?

Perhaps the suite might be reinstated after the draft charter is written and the draft shows harm to teachers.

teachers. Some recent posts on Texas Group have been about the deception and/or destruction of guaranteed state public pension systems around the country.

... I just don't understand how the process can be continued if the process has been determined to be unlawful from the start. Shouldn't the entire process be judged unlawful and corrupted at this point?

compare with the current State approved process. After the draft charter or charter is drawn up, then parts of its processes or its objectives, could be determined to be harmful. I see the Charter document as an opposing platform to the current/2014-15 school year DISD Curriculum, in the November election. Where's the Draft-Where's the Beef, so these opposing documents can get chewed?

... a state law was broken when the DAC members were appointed, and not elected. Why would the initial charter draft be needed to prove harm? At the point that DAC members have unlawfully been seated by those who want the DISD system dismantled, I would think that would be enough harm proven.

But anyway, thanks for your help.