Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
How dancing on Cheney Stadium's roof could cost the Rainiers nearly $60,000
How dancing on Cheney Stadium’s roof could cost the Rainiers nearly $60,000
BY MATT DRISCOLL
JANUARY 02, 2019 05:04 PM,
UPDATED JANUARY 03, 2019 09:22 AM
Climbing the long ladder leading up to Cheney Stadium’s roof last summer, I had a lot running through my mind. .... What I certainly wasn’t thinking about — at least at the time — was how this silly assignment, which I’d dreamed up months earlier, would end up costing The News Tribune $2,100 in fines from the state Department of Labor and Industries.
Even more, what I never could have fathomed — in a million years, in fact — was that the same silly assignment would eventually lead to nearly $60,000 in fines being levied against the Rainiers.
But months later, after a series of mildly ridiculous interrogation interviews, at least one threatened subpoena, and a thorough review of all the incriminating photo and video evidence — which, of course, we’d proudly published on social media, in our paper and on our website — that’s exactly what happened.
There are lessons in all of this, I suppose, though I’m still not entirely sure what all of them are. One of them certainly has to do with how seriously L&I takes workplace safety.
....
BY MATT DRISCOLL
JANUARY 02, 2019 05:04 PM,
UPDATED JANUARY 03, 2019 09:22 AM
Climbing the long ladder leading up to Cheney Stadium’s roof last summer, I had a lot running through my mind. .... What I certainly wasn’t thinking about — at least at the time — was how this silly assignment, which I’d dreamed up months earlier, would end up costing The News Tribune $2,100 in fines from the state Department of Labor and Industries.
Even more, what I never could have fathomed — in a million years, in fact — was that the same silly assignment would eventually lead to nearly $60,000 in fines being levied against the Rainiers.
But months later, after a series of mildly ridiculous interrogation interviews, at least one threatened subpoena, and a thorough review of all the incriminating photo and video evidence — which, of course, we’d proudly published on social media, in our paper and on our website — that’s exactly what happened.
There are lessons in all of this, I suppose, though I’m still not entirely sure what all of them are. One of them certainly has to do with how seriously L&I takes workplace safety.
....
The leading cause of death in the construction industry is falls.
42 percent of construction worker deaths involve falls, new database shows
January 30, 2018
Silver Spring, MD — A recently created database allowed researchers to determine that, in a 33-year period, falls accounted for nearly half of all construction worker deaths – and more than half of the workers killed lacked access to fall protection – according to the Center for Construction Research and Training (also known as CPWR).
Using data from the NIOSH Fatality Assessment and Control Evaluation program, the researchers found fatality reports for 768 construction industry fatalities and created a searchable database, the Construction FACE Database, of those reports.
After analyzing the incidents in the new database, researchers concluded that, between 1982 and 2015:
• 42 percent (325) of the fatalities involved falls.
• 54 percent of the workers killed had no access to a personal fall arrest system, and 23 percent had access to a PFAS but did not use it.
• Most of the workers with no access to PFAS worked for residential building contractors and contractors in the roofing, siding and sheet metal sectors.
• 107 of the 325 falls were from 30 feet or higher.
• 20 percent of the 768 deaths occurred in the victims’ first two months on the job.
“Even though this study was unable to assess effectiveness of the OSHA fall protection standard established in 1995, the considerable number of fall fatalities from lower heights provides strong evidence of the need for the OSHA requirement that fall protection be provided at elevations of 6 feet or more in the construction industry,” researchers said.
In the study abstract, the researchers say the database allowed them to analyze FACE reports “quantitatively and efficiently,” adding “comprehensive research using FACE reports may improve understanding of work-related fatalities and provide much-needed information on injury prevention.”
....
January 30, 2018
Silver Spring, MD — A recently created database allowed researchers to determine that, in a 33-year period, falls accounted for nearly half of all construction worker deaths – and more than half of the workers killed lacked access to fall protection – according to the Center for Construction Research and Training (also known as CPWR).
Using data from the NIOSH Fatality Assessment and Control Evaluation program, the researchers found fatality reports for 768 construction industry fatalities and created a searchable database, the Construction FACE Database, of those reports.
After analyzing the incidents in the new database, researchers concluded that, between 1982 and 2015:
• 42 percent (325) of the fatalities involved falls.
• 54 percent of the workers killed had no access to a personal fall arrest system, and 23 percent had access to a PFAS but did not use it.
• Most of the workers with no access to PFAS worked for residential building contractors and contractors in the roofing, siding and sheet metal sectors.
• 107 of the 325 falls were from 30 feet or higher.
• 20 percent of the 768 deaths occurred in the victims’ first two months on the job.
“Even though this study was unable to assess effectiveness of the OSHA fall protection standard established in 1995, the considerable number of fall fatalities from lower heights provides strong evidence of the need for the OSHA requirement that fall protection be provided at elevations of 6 feet or more in the construction industry,” researchers said.
In the study abstract, the researchers say the database allowed them to analyze FACE reports “quantitatively and efficiently,” adding “comprehensive research using FACE reports may improve understanding of work-related fatalities and provide much-needed information on injury prevention.”
....
