public is thinking, she listened and then has geared her campaign with those facts.

difference.

Viva La Difference!

Such a brilliant way to do things.

Not talking at them but with them. Go Hillary!

job!

I think this is something new with Bernie. I have never seen something like this before. I will vote for the Democratic nominee.

This is Hillary's Group.

I am not against anyone who is a Democrat.

lines.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027221653

Nothing I said was extreme. It was normal.

every other supporter on this board is "partisan".

There's nothing "normal" about what you just did.

Hillary Clinton. You are calling out a special group as partisan, and supplying a link to that special group. You don't post a link to a special group, then imply that there is something wrong with them being partisan. Special groups are protected areas from that kind of snark.

Group. didn't seem to penetrate.

I was asked to be on the jury the thread that was criticizing the group, and before I could
vote to hide it, one of the Admins correctly locked the thread.

The point, one way or another, has definitely been made

Thanks

and saying.. "holy cow.. they're so partisan in there.. What's up with that?!!!!"

They really need to start making people read the TOS and check a block, or something. He doesn't have a clue as to the basics of how this site works.

thread Locked in GD because he's ALWAYS RIGHT and EVERYONE ELSE is WRONG. LMAO!

What a riot! It's all about him! mememememememmemememememe. lol

He needs his cross

Sadly, DU doesn't have a martyr icon
The site really should get one

He's been through DU2 and DU3.

No reason for acting like that.

You posted a thread in GD to funnel people here, so that they might comment, perhaps not realizing they were in a safe haven.

If I were an admin, I'd PPR you. That's some low conduct. Hopefully you've already been banned from here, but maybe you'd better just understand that this isn't the way to behave. I'll never trust you again.

Hillary supporters elsewhere because we're "partisan".

Just like nobody is "partisan" Except Hill supporters. ROFL

Bye.

so please be gentle with me.

But this whole, "only post positive things about HRC" in this group (or about Bernie Sanders in his group) thing smacks of those studies revealing how people tend to research and read about subjects with which they already agree. Resulting in them missing new information and perhaps adjusting their opinions accordingly.

But I get it, we have rules to follow and all, I guess?

They have the whole rest of the board for that.

There's no "new information" to be missed here. Thank you for respecting our Group.

It's a rather contentious place.


The safe havens are where you go to put your feet up and talk nice with people who are on your wavelength.

As it is, this is a website where a majority of the people skew outside the party norm, so as a consequence, if you're solidly in the middle of the Democratic Party in terms of your approach to politics, you're regarded by some as a "right winger" here.

Look familiar?

[img][/img]

It's one of many 'super-rallies' from 2000.

For Ralph Nader.

See post fourteen just up thread.

See how some DUers aren't really your friends? Sending you to a closed group for Clinton supporters, when you're a Sanders fan?

Not very nice, that kind of thing, is it?

and busted a gut laughing at it !!! U guys are funny!

and her supporters.

Safe havens don't mean a damn thing to certain supporters of another candidate.

Whoosh!

locked, anyway.

It is a cheap and disruptive tactic to come in here playing the "OH I like Hillary" card, and then posting a thread in another forum sending people here with a link to complain about the post.

Talk about a sleaze move. But that is what a recently blocked poster in this thread did.

phantom that many middle class Americans support HRC and do and have met with her across America to discuss issues that are important to them.

is that you only hear the top 1%.

next President of the United States of America.

They're free, and all you have to do is RSVP and get there early to be sure you'll get in. You can ask questions, too. It's a very different vibe.

Welcome to the Hillary Clinton group. Did someone named Rusty shunt you over here?

Caused a bit of a stir in this thread I see. tehe

the mark.

Whoosh!

Pathetic.

Some people just talk, only a few listen. Just saying.

successful Senate run.

exception.

But, sanders is out there trying to tear him down. Like that's going to happen.

It is early in the primary. She should be talking with people, not talking at them. This "listening tour" process is how she ran her successful Senate campaign.

This is how you find out what is important to people across the country, instead of preaching to them what they should think is important. That is how she found out that so many people desperately want help with drug addiction treatment for their family members.

the sound of her own voice.

Well said, SunSeeker.. Mahalo!

"This is how you find out what is important to people across the country, instead of preaching to them what they should think is important. That is how she found out that so many people desperately want help with drug addiction treatment for their family members."

Great post!

It's a well studied psychological phenomenon.

Crowd Manipulation on Wikipedia

Crowd manipulation is the intentional use of techniques based on the principles of crowd psychology to engage, control, or influence the desires of a crowd in order to direct its behavior toward a specific action.[1] This practice is common to politics and business and can facilitate the approval or disapproval or indifference to a person, policy, or product. The ethicality of crowd manipulation is commonly questioned.
Crowd manipulation differs from propaganda although they may reinforce one another to produce a desired result. If propaganda is "the consistent, enduring effort to create or shape events to influence the relations of the public to an enterprise, idea or group",[2] crowd manipulation is the relatively brief call to action once the seeds of propaganda (i.e. more specifically "pre-propaganda"[3]) are sown and the public is organized into a crowd. The propagandist appeals to the masses, even if compartmentalized, whereas the crowd manipulator appeals to a segment of the masses assembled into a crowd in real time. In situations such as a national emergency, however, a crowd manipulator may leverage mass media to address the masses in real time as if speaking to a crowd.[4]

More at the link