Hillary Clinton
Related: About this forumThe Numbers Behind Maureen Dowd's 21-Year Long Campaign Against Hillary Clinton (HILLARY GROUP)
72 Percent Of Dowd Columns Negative Towards Clinton
For more than twenty years, New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd has been attacking Hillary Clinton from a shallow well of insults, routinely portraying the former secretary of state and first lady as an unlikeable, power-hungry phony.
Media Matters analyzed 195 columns by Dowd since November 1993 containing significant mentions of Clinton for whether they included any of 16 negative tropes in five categories (listed in the below methodology). 72 percent (141 columns) were negative towards Clinton -- only 8 percent (15 columns) were positive. The remaining 20 percent (39 columns) were neutral.
For example, Dowd has repeatedly accused Clinton of being an enemy to or betraying feminism (35 columns, 18 percent of those studied), power-hungry (51 columns, 26 percent), unlikeable (9 columns, 5 percent), or phony (34 columns, 17 percent). She's also attacked the Clintons as a couple in 43 columns (22 percent), many of which included Dowd's ham-handed attempts at psychoanalysis....
(Note: Here in the article are tons of detailed examples from Dowd's columns in which she attacks Hillary in the following areas.)
* Plotting For Power
o Hillary is inflexible/uncompromising
o Hillary has a bunker mentality, will not listen to detractors
o Hillary acts tough
o Hillary is always scheming for more power
* Betrayed Feminism And Played The Victim
o Hillary is bad for feminism
o Hillary traded on slights from men to get ahead
o Hillary fakes her feminism
* People don't like her, she's not a nice person
o Hillary is mean
o Hillary is not likeable
o Hillary is cold and unemotional
* She's a phony
o Hillary doesn't know who she is
o Hillary has no 'real' identity
o Hillary doesn't believe what she says
o Hillary is scripted and prepackaged and poll-driven
* Targeting The Clintons As A Couple
o The Clintons won't go away, even though everyone wants them to
o Their marriage is a sham, a trade of power for more power
http://mediamatters.org/blog/2014/06/18/the-numbers-behind-maureen-dowds-21-year-long-c/199752 via Media Matters
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)I saw foxnews used today as a source on du to trash a union that endorsed her.
Talk about sour grapes.
trueblue2007
(17,194 posts)Rachel maddow is not on tonight, someone is taking her place and is doing a piece on DAMNABLE DOWD. Dowd is going after Biden now.
What a Dowd.... a GOPig??? She sure as heck is not objective. She HATES Dems. Why can't Dowd get FIRED !!!
mcar
(42,278 posts)I cannot understand how she gets prime real estate space in "the paper of record." Her columns are usually trite, nasty and full of lies. It's like reading a middle schoolers rant.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Walk away
(9,494 posts)She is freakishly jealous of anyone who is admired by intelligent people. I suppose it's because no one really thinks very much of her abilities and the only power she has, is the power to destroy her betters.
oasis
(49,338 posts)Evergreen Emerald
(13,069 posts)Cha
(296,893 posts)But, her ignorant, HDS marathon is legion.