Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DesertRat

(27,995 posts)
Wed Oct 21, 2015, 04:59 PM Oct 2015

Clinton isn't the one on the defensive in the Benghazi hearings

The House Select Committee on Benghazi has been furiously preparing for months to interrogate Hillary Rodham Clinton about private email accounts, the computer server in her house, and Americans killed in Libya, but on the eve of the hearing Thursday, it is not Clinton who is on the defensive.

It is the committee.

Congressional Republicans have made so many missteps in the run-up to their marquee event of the presidential primary that the chairman of the committee finally implored his colleagues over the weekend, "Shut up talking about things you don't know anything about." The Clinton campaign now views the daylong grilling that once threatened to derail her White House bid as a veritable campaign stop.

{snip}

"Republicans on the committee are going to be under intense pressure to justify their very existence, to justify the existence of this committee and to prove to the American people that this committee is not just another arm of the Republican National Committee," White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest said Tuesday.

http://www.latimes.com/nation/politics/la-na-clinton-benghazi-20151021-story.html
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Clinton isn't the one on the defensive in the Benghazi hearings (Original Post) DesertRat Oct 2015 OP
K&R! stonecutter357 Oct 2015 #1
Kick & recommended. William769 Oct 2015 #2
I'll give this... quickesst Oct 2015 #3

quickesst

(6,280 posts)
3. I'll give this...
Wed Oct 21, 2015, 06:55 PM
Oct 2015

...a big K&R, but I'm curious as to why the repub cut in embassy security isn't brought up. Couldn't she then say, "If the republicans had not voted to cut security funding for our embassies, there is a good possibility we wouldn't be having this conversation, and four American citizens would still be alive." I admit to being somewhat ignorant compared to most regular posters here, and would like an explanation as to why this isn't a viable strategy. Thanks.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Hillary Clinton»Clinton isn't the one on ...