Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Sam1

(498 posts)
Thu Jun 19, 2014, 04:51 AM Jun 2014

Beware of structural explanations of cyclical events

One of the things you can always bet on with surety is that the conservatives will always try to convince the public that a cyclical event is, in fact, a ‘structural’ event. This has two, linked purposes. First, they can downplay any hint that aggregate fiscal policy interventions, which work at the macroeconomic level are necessary no matter how bad the problem is. Second, they can then wheel out their favourite ‘structural’ remedies, all of which just happen to result in national income being distributed to profits or high income earners, less capacity for low-wage workers to enjoy real wage rises or reasonably share in national productivity growth, and lower government income support payments to the disadvantaged. A double-whammy strategy. Here is an example of that sort of lie. The US Employment-Population ratio has fallen dramatically since the onset of the crisis and remains stuck at low levels. The reason is clear – there was a huge collapse in employment in 2008 and 2009 and, in the recovery, the rate of job creation has not been sufficiently strong to reverse that decline. Total employment growth has been around or just above the underlying growth in the civilian population (above 16 years), which is why the ratio is stuck. There needs to be much faster employment growth for the US to make back the ground that was lost in the downturn. While the US civilian population is growing older and that is having an impact on the calculated Employment-Population ratio, the impact is small and doesn’t alter the fact that a huge negative cyclical event occurred in the US and the fiscal intervention was not large enough to fix the problem.


http://bilbo.economicoutlook.net/blog/?p=28067

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Beware of structural explanations of cyclical events (Original Post) Sam1 Jun 2014 OP
It wasn't even cyclical, it was PLANNED Demeter Jun 2014 #1
 

Demeter

(85,373 posts)
1. It wasn't even cyclical, it was PLANNED
Thu Jun 19, 2014, 07:25 AM
Jun 2014

by throwing off Glass-Steagal and other regulatory functions in the belief and propaganda that it wasn't necessary (a belief NEVER supported by historical experience)

and whacking down the taxes on the rich (in another belief that this would be good for everybody, historical experience to the contrary)

the Obscenely Rich and Still Greedy forced this economic disaster upon us all.

And given their fascination and insistence upon Austerity Economics, the disaster cannot help but to continue, until we have a revolution: peaceful at the ballot box (barring any more electoral fraud a la Rove and Supreme Court) or violent in the streets, a la French Revolution, Bolshevik Revolution and other rebellions of that sort.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Economy»Beware of structural expl...