Economy
Related: About this forumBankers Want Your Savings As Part of Their Next Bail-Out
More on "bail-ins"--
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/12/03/1348957/-Bankers-Want-Your-Savings-As-Part-of-Their-Next-Bail-Out#
Enter the Financial Stability Board. In her blog post "New G20 Rules:Cyprus-Style Bail-Ins to Hit Depositors and Pensioners" http://ellenbrown.com/... Ellen Brown explains:
At the G20 meeting last month in Australia, the FSB presented and received approval for their latest plan for conducting the "resolution proceeding", i.e. bankruptcy, for a troubled TBTF bank. Cutting to the chase, the pertinent part for my dear readers is that instead of their tax money going to bail out the banks, it will potentially be their bank deposit money! The FSB recommended that governments make statutory the confiscation of depositors' money (also known as unsecured debt) if the assets of the bank plus all secured debt is insufficient to keep them afloat. This has come to be known as a bail-in.
Further, the FSB has put our pension funds at risk as well. They require banks to hold a buffer of securities to be liquidated to prevent insolvency ahead of resorting to deposits. Among other instruments in these buffers are bonds in which pension funds are invested.
Let's suppose you have a good amount of cash in a Wells Fargo savings account. Furthermore, your pension fund is invested in bonds which WF owns in their emergency buffer account. The next financial crash occurs. The TBTF banks, now with greater risk exposure than ever, start tumbling. Heading for insolvency, bank regulators force WF to liquidate its assets and it's secured debt to raise cash. If that is insufficient the buffer securities will be sold off next. There goes a chunk of your pension fund's money. And if THAT is insufficient the regulators will go after the cash in large deposit accounts first, then, perhaps, get to yours.
The bottom line is, the government is preparing to legitimize the theft of our savings in order to prop up irresponsible and unscrupulous bankers. A far better solution, still, is to break up the TBTF banks proactively, thus avoiding the bankruptcies and the need to save the banks on the backs of the people.
obxhead
(8,434 posts)I've said for years, being a banker should be the most dangerous job in the world. An action like this might make it so.
ReRe
(10,597 posts)To protect them from the global bail-in? Off-shoring is out. In the mattress? In a hole in the ground, like buried treasure?
billhicks76
(5,082 posts)They are lucky they have made it this far unscathed.
Ilsa
(61,694 posts)Meager savings. Hubby has a 401(k) whose "home" he cannot control. I have an IRA at a brokerage firm which is not NYC based, but it's still NYSE/NASDAQ partially invested.
I guess we need to put the money in credit unions, but I suspect they are indirectly invested at the same gambling table the TBTF banks are in.
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)Zero Hedge did a story on it last March.
and very recently, in Nov. the US and Britain made a big show of announcing "failed banks will not be seeking taxpayer dollars for bail outs"
as if twas all good news.
So, we are hearing about it more and more now. Hmmmmm
The problem is that without banks inflating the money supply, there is no money for government to spend. Destroy the banks and you destroy your welfare checks. Oh, and ellen brown does not no what she is talking about. You should look at other sources.
Thor_MN
(11,843 posts)eridani
(51,907 posts)I don't think the "bail in" proposals are that detailed yet.