Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(99,597 posts)
Sat Jun 14, 2014, 01:42 PM Jun 2014

Pinched by Ride-Sharing Services, Cabbies Seek a National Union


X post in Socialist-Progressive


http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/07/business/pinched-by-ride-sharing-services-cabbies-seek-a-national-union.html?_r=1

By STEVEN GREENHOUSEJUNE 6, 2014

CHICAGO — Never timid in its rush to expand, Uber, the app-based car service, skirted city law when it told drivers in its UberX ride-sharing program last month that they could start picking up passengers at O’Hare International Airport.

The fledgling union for Chicago’s taxi drivers complained, citing an ordinance barring anyone but taxicabs and limousine services from serving the airports. Chicago officials were soon shooing away the UberX drivers, although Uber defended its actions by saying O’Hare desperately needed additional transportation options.



Peter Ali Enger, right, chief organizer for the United Taxidrivers Community Council, at Chicago O’Hare Airport. Credit Nathan Weber for The New York Times


But the taxi drivers’ victory was short-lived. The Chicago City Council voted 34 to 10 on May 28 to give ride-sharing companies much of what they wanted. The new law set no limits on the number of companies, vehicles or ride-sharing drivers and would let those drivers operate at the city’s two main airports, O’Hare and Midway.

The Uber smartphone app, which connects drivers with passengers, is shaking up the taxi industry in dozens of cities.DealBook: Uber Attains Eye-Popping New Levels of FundingJUNE 6, 2014
As services like UberX, whose drivers often use their own vehicles to transport passengers, make inroads in city after city, traditional taxi drivers are facing a loss of clout and livelihood. Years of rising gas prices and, in many places, stagnant fares have contributed to lower incomes for many drivers.

FULL story at link.

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Pinched by Ride-Sharing Services, Cabbies Seek a National Union (Original Post) Omaha Steve Jun 2014 OP
Guilds vs Apprentices kg4jxt Jun 2014 #1

kg4jxt

(30 posts)
1. Guilds vs Apprentices
Tue Jun 17, 2014, 06:44 AM
Jun 2014

On the one hand, we all want a free market where innovation can bring us new and better services for less money. On the other hand, we recognize that the investments in livelihood made by Guilds or professions, represent the individual investments of real people who stand to lose from the creative destructions of the unconstrained market. Laws such as the Chicago Taxi regulations attempt to protect the professional drivers from apprentices with less training (and who therefore can offer lower rates) or who have a lower capital investment in their vehicle (and whose vehicle may therefore not meet some standard of taxi safety, spaciousness, or comfort - though I admit to ignorance of what such standards might exist). But government laws do not protect the mule-driver profession from the automobile (as an example). I think taxi-drivers are in trouble from Uber, but even more from automation of driving (google cars for example). A union might buy them time, but it will not save them.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Omaha Steve's Labor Group»Pinched by Ride-Sharing S...