Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,859 posts)
Wed Aug 24, 2016, 03:06 AM Aug 2016

Microplastics should be banned in cosmetics to save oceans, MPs say

Source: The Guardian

Microplastics should be banned in cosmetics to save oceans, MPs say

Environmental audit committee calls for ban after hearing
that microbeads harm marine life and enter the food chain


John Vidal Environment editor
Wednesday 24 August 2016 00.01 BST

Cosmetics companies must be banned from using plastic microbeads in scrubs, toothpaste and beauty products because of the marine pollution they are causing, say a group of MPs.

Members of the environmental audit committee have called for a ban within 18 months after hearing that trillions of tiny pieces of plastic are accumulating in the world’s oceans, lakes and estuaries, harming marine life and entering the food chain. About 86 tonnes of microplastics are released into the environment every year in the UK from facial exfoliants alone, they were told.

Microplastic pollution comes from the fragmentation of larger pieces of plastic waste, small synthetic fibres from clothing and the microbeads used in cosmetics and other products. The microbeads in scrubs, shower gels and toothpastes are an avoidable part of this plastic pollution problem. A single shower could result in 100,000 plastic particles entering the ocean, said the committee chair, Mary Creagh.

“We need a full, legal ban, preferably at an international level as pollution does not respect borders,” she added. “If this isn’t possible after our vote to leave the EU, then the government should introduce a national ban. The best way to reduce this pollution is to prevent plastic being flushed into the sea in the first place.”

[font size=1]-snip-[/font]

Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/aug/24/microplastics-ban-in-cosmetics-save-oceans-mps-say-microbeads

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Microplastics should be banned in cosmetics to save oceans, MPs say (Original Post) Eugene Aug 2016 OP
The microbeads are too small for water treatment to get out... SeattleVet Aug 2016 #1
Microbeads aren't the big problem n2doc Aug 2016 #2

SeattleVet

(5,477 posts)
1. The microbeads are too small for water treatment to get out...
Wed Aug 24, 2016, 05:40 AM
Aug 2016

they act like sponges for various toxins concentrating them, and they have been found in pretty much every lake, river, and all through the oceans. They are eaten as plankton (the base of the food chain) by many animals, providing no nutrition but delivering a load of toxins.

The US has a planned phased-in ban that takes effect next year.

http://www.motherjones.com/blue-marble/2016/01/congress-banned-those-tiny-pieces-plastic-your-tooth-paste-and-face-scrub

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
2. Microbeads aren't the big problem
Wed Aug 24, 2016, 08:48 AM
Aug 2016

fibers from clothing and other cloth are. The industry is willingly moving away from plastic microbeads, but people looking at micro plastics are seeing way more fibers than beads.

https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/2014/oct/27/toxic-plastic-synthetic-microscopic-oceans-microbeads-microfibers-food-chain

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Microplastics should be b...