Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OKIsItJustMe

(19,937 posts)
Thu Aug 25, 2016, 05:26 PM Aug 2016

An effective and low-cost solution for storing solar energy

http://actu.epfl.ch/news/an-effective-and-low-cost-solution-for-storing-sol/
[font face=Serif][font size=5]An effective and low-cost solution for storing solar energy[/font]

[font size=4]25.08.16 - Solar energy can be stored by converting it into hydrogen. But current methods are too expensive and don’t last long. Using commercially available solar cells and none of the usual rare metals, researchers at EPFL and CSEM have now designed a device that outperforms in stability, efficiency and cost.[/font]

[font size=3]…

The approach taken by EPFL and CSEM researchers is to combine components that have already proven effective in industry in order to develop a robust and effective system. Their prototype is made up of three interconnected, new-generation, crystalline silicon solar cells attached to an electrolysis system that does not rely on rare metals. The device is able to convert solar energy into hydrogen at a rate of 14.2%, and has already been run for more than 100 hours straight under test conditions. The method, which surpasses previous efforts in terms of stability, performance, lifespan and cost efficiency, is published in the Journal of The Electrochemical Society.

Enough to power a fuel cell car over 10,000km every year
“A 12-14 m² system installed in Switzerland would allow the generation and storage of enough hydrogen to power a fuel cell car over 10,000 km every year”, says Christophe Ballif, who co-authored the paper. In terms of performance, this is a world record for silicon solar cells and for hydrogen production without using rare metals. It also offers a high level of stability.

High voltage cells have an edge
The key here is making the most of existing components, and using a ‘hybrid’ type of crystalline-silicon solar cell based on heterojunction technology. The researchers’ sandwich structure – using layers of crystalline silicon and amorphous silicon – allows for higher voltages. And this means that just three of these cells, interconnected, can already generate an almost ideal voltage for electrolysis to occur. The electrochemical part of the process requires a catalyst made from nickel, which is widely available.



The new system is unique when it comes to cost, performance and lifespan. “We wanted to develop a high performance system that can work under current conditions,” says Jan-Willem Schüttauf, a researcher at CSEM and co-author of the paper. “The heterojunction cells that we use belong to the family of crystalline silicon cells, which alone account for about 90% of the solar panel market. It is a well-known and robust technology whose lifespan exceeds 25 years. And it also happens to cover the south side of the CSEM building in Neuchâtel.”

…[/font][/font]
http://dx.doi.org/10.1149/2.0541610jes
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
An effective and low-cost solution for storing solar energy (Original Post) OKIsItJustMe Aug 2016 OP
Hydrogen gas is scary dangerous. tonyt53 Aug 2016 #1
Compared to what? OKIsItJustMe Aug 2016 #2
No more dangerous than natural gas, safer than propane. JonathanRackham Aug 2016 #3
Actually, it is the "leakiest" of all gases. eppur_se_muova Aug 2016 #4
What do you suppose 14.2% is a measure of? kristopher Aug 2016 #5

OKIsItJustMe

(19,937 posts)
2. Compared to what?
Thu Aug 25, 2016, 05:47 PM
Aug 2016

Compared to say… gasoline?

http://www.consumerenergycenter.org/transportation/fuelcell/index.html

[font face=Serif][font size=3]…[/font]

[font size=4]Is Hydrogen more dangerous than other fuels?[/font]

[font size=3] Hydrogen is not more dangerous than any other fuel. Hydrogen's hazards are usually managed easier than hydrocarbon fuels because hydrogen is lighter than air, and it burns upward and disperses. Hydrogen can however, cause brittleness in some materials, including metals, and can generate electrostatic charges and sparks through flow or agitation.

…[/font][/font]

eppur_se_muova

(36,256 posts)
4. Actually, it is the "leakiest" of all gases.
Thu Aug 25, 2016, 07:46 PM
Aug 2016

H2 molecules are so small they can permeate through glass and other materials. Some metals absorb large amounts of H2, which can permeate through and even degrade the metal.

Every high-energy fuel carries some hazards, as do non-chemical energy storage methods. But the extra complications of H2 should not be minimized -- they are what have slowed the more widespread adoption of hydrogen technology. If H2 were as simple to handle as propane, it would have taken over the energy markets already.

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
5. What do you suppose 14.2% is a measure of?
Thu Aug 25, 2016, 09:40 PM
Aug 2016

I'm not able to access the paper and the abstract isn't completely clear as to whether it's 14.2% of insolation or 14.2% of the silicon panels' electrical output.

If they are referring to insolation then they have something notable. If electricity, then 14% needs to improve 5-6 fold for it to have a shot at wide scale commercial adoption. Even then, battery efficiencies will steal the market for most applications.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»An effective and low-cost...