Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

nitpicker

(7,153 posts)
Thu Jan 30, 2020, 06:42 AM Jan 2020

Climate change: Worst emissions scenario 'misleading'

https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-51281986

Climate change: Worst emissions scenario 'misleading'

By Matt McGrath
Environment correspondent

29 January 2020

The worst-case scenario for emissions of CO2 this century is no longer plausible, say researchers. Referred to as "business as usual", the scenario assumes a 500% increase in the use of coal, which is now considered unlikely. Climate models suggest that this level of carbon could see warming of up to 6C by 2100, with severe impacts. Researchers say that on current trends, a rise in temperatures of around 3C is far more likely.

How has this confusion come about?

About 10 years ago, ahead of the fifth assessment report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), researchers developed four different scenarios to describe how carbon emissions might change over the rest of this century.

One of these clumsily titled "Representative Concentration Pathways" (RCPs), was called RCP8.5 and it was intended to show the impact of very high emissions consistent with a five fold increase in the use of coal and virtually no policies to limit CO2 emissions.

RCP8.5 was first developed by energy researchers to help with their modelling. According to the authors of this paper, they didn't do a good job of communicating the limitations of this approach to climate scientists who wanted to use it to see what would happen with temperatures. Rather than being seen as something that only had a 3% chance of becoming reality, it became known as the "business-as-usual" scenario, by climate scientists and has been used in more than 2,000 research papers since.

"What we're arguing is that we've been misusing the worst climate change scenario," said author Zeke Hausfather, director of climate and energy at the Breakthrough Institute in California. "Obviously, a lot has changed since 2005 or so when the scenario was created. A lot of clean technology prices have fallen, by factors of five, while global coal use peaked in 2013. And it's been flat since then."
(snip)
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Climate change: Worst emissions scenario 'misleading' (Original Post) nitpicker Jan 2020 OP
K&R Control-Z Jan 2020 #1
3 Degrees Celsis Means Near Extinction DanieRains Jan 2020 #2
No it doesn't Loki Liesmith Jan 2020 #3
Seems Every Model Gets Worse DanieRains Jan 2020 #4

Loki Liesmith

(4,602 posts)
3. No it doesn't
Thu Jan 30, 2020, 08:15 AM
Jan 2020

I’ve done climate modeling. It means things get shitty and hard. And lots more people die. But it’s not near extinction for humans. If you live near the equator things will get pretty rough though.

 

DanieRains

(4,619 posts)
4. Seems Every Model Gets Worse
Fri Jan 31, 2020, 01:43 AM
Jan 2020

Then the Arctic melts.

Game over.

Sucks.

1,400 gigatons of co2 plus methane.

Sounds like a lot....

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Climate change: Worst emi...