Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumPower-Starved Pakistan Discovers Huge Deposits Of Low-Grade Coal - Gosh, What Will They Do Now?
EDIT
As a result, after years of massive blackouts that have plagued the country and destroyed much of its industrial sector, energy-starved Pakistan is setting its eyes on a coal-fired future. Recent discoveries of massive low and low to medium-quality coal reserves in the southern part of the country have led many to endorse the decision to compensate for the current energy deficit by setting up coal-fired power plants.
Regarded as the dirtiest of all fossil fuels, coal is considered one of the largest contributors of carbon emissions that are causing rapid climate change. Around the world, coal has been the cause of several social and environmental conflicts, and has resulted in massive human displacements in recent history.
Additionally, coal-related industries are responsible for creating water scarcity and food risks in countries where the use of water for energy is prioritised over agriculture and food production. This has led many experts and specialists in the energy and climate sectors to show reservations towards coal-fired power plants.
EDIT
Energy production through coal consumes huge quantities of water. A typical 660-MW coal power plant, for instance, requires up to three billion gallons of water annually for its cooling system. Imagine having several such coal plants set up in a country that is already facing severe droughts and water shortages; it is a daunting prospect. Despite this, the recent discovery of coal reserves in the Thar Desert in Pakistans southern Sindh Province has sparked both domestic and international interest. For example, China is set to invest around 1.5 billion dollars in Thar Coal. Similarly, Burj Power, a UAE-based company, has signed a deal worth 700 million dollars to set up four coal plants at Port Qasim, near Karachi.
EDIT
http://www.ipsnews.net/2014/06/pakistans-coal-rush-a-bubble-waiting-to-burst/
Leme
(1,092 posts)IMO , better dirty coal than clean nuclear electricity.
hunter
(38,303 posts)The devil that you know has long been held preferable to the devil you don't.
But it's not an either/or question in my mind. Fossil fuel use is self-limiting. It eventually destroys the world civilization that depends on it.
There are other paths, but too many people in power are getting too wealthy promoting the high energy "consumer" economic model.
Global warming and climate change are going to hit the poor and the least powerful the hardest.
Those with wealth are able to debate the false dichotomy of nuclear vs. coal and move to a new place if their old place becomes uninhabitable. People with nothing die in the refugee camps. It's already happening.
From my perspective fossil fuel use simply ought to be banned and from that place communities and nations allowed to find the alternatives that best suit them. In any case, an economy that does not use fossil fuels does not look like the economy we have now.
WhiteTara
(29,692 posts)GliderGuider
(21,088 posts)Not.
Benton D Struckcheon
(2,347 posts)To wit:
The operation will be extremely costly, and will hold Pakistan hostage to imports and international markets for many years to come. Neighbouring India is learning this lesson the hard way, with high import prices of coal making thermal power plants economically infeasible without massive government bailouts and soaring energy prices to the end consumer.
...
Over 30 power plants went on a distress sale last year as enthusiastic entrepreneurs built coal plants in haste but were unable to run them owing to massive coal shortages. This has become a recurring theme in India that is pushing coal-financing institutions to completely rethink their investment strategy.
The title of that article is Pakistans Coal Rush: A Bubble Waiting to Burst.
The whole thrust of it is that this coal plan is, basically, nuts, and that coal in India has run into a brick wall. Even if the plants get built, it's an open question how long Pakistan will be able to afford to keep them running.