Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hatrack

(59,584 posts)
Mon Jun 2, 2014, 09:14 AM Jun 2014

House Science Cmte. Declares IPCC Report "Not Science"; Berates, Interrupts 1 Non-Hack Witness

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report warned that more intense droughts and heat waves will cause famine and water shortages. But, don't worry! Yesterday, the GOP held a hearing to tell us the IPCC is, in fact, a global conspiracy to control our lives and "redistribute wealth among nations."

The hearing, titled "Examining the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Process," was convened by the House Committee on Science, Space and Technology—the same folks who recently demonstrated their inability to grasp the idea that the world's climate varies across different regions and who informed us that warmer weather didn't bother the dinosaurs, so what's all the fuss about?

EDIT

Koebler describes how things went down at the hearing after the experts presented their statements:

For two hours, climate change deniers interrupted, berated, and cut off Oppenheimer, while the other three other witnesses fielded softball questions from conservative lawmakers and dodged tougher ones from Democratic ones. In fact, at one point, Rep. Larry Buchson (R-Ind.), who, seconds before had interrupted Oppenheimer and said he wasn't interested in hearing his views, wanted to "apologize on behalf of Congress" to Pielke for the aforementioned "juvenile and insulting questions trying to disparage the credibility" of witnesses who didn't take climate change seriously…..

Dana Rohrabacher [R-CA] pulled out the air quotes when he said "global warming," and took offense to Oppenheimer not being able to "capsulize" all the reasons why he believes that climate change is a big deal in 10 seconds. Smith suggested that the "only thing we know about [climate change models] is that they will be wrong" and suggested that "even if the US was completely eliminated, it's not going to have any discernible impact on global temperatures in the near or far future." Paul Broun [R-GA] and Buchson noted their belief in the "scientific process" and suggested that they knew more about it because they are doctors (Broun is a dentist; Buchson is a surgeon).

EDIT

http://io9.com/the-house-science-committee-declares-the-ipcc-report-is-1583909402

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
House Science Cmte. Declares IPCC Report "Not Science"; Berates, Interrupts 1 Non-Hack Witness (Original Post) hatrack Jun 2014 OP
You got to admit, when it comes to "not science" pscot Jun 2014 #1
The House Committee is full of idiots Gothmog Jun 2014 #2
The GOP will only recognize climate change when Wall Street is under water. Viva_Daddy Jun 2014 #3
Well this morning's reading is off to a good start ... Nihil Jun 2014 #4
It's probably not a good idea to argue science with a guy named Oppenheimer NickB79 Jun 2014 #5
notes from the GOP parallel universe. Who needs reality when you can make up an imaginary world of Bill USA Jun 2014 #6

pscot

(21,024 posts)
1. You got to admit, when it comes to "not science"
Mon Jun 2, 2014, 11:11 AM
Jun 2014

These guys are the experts. Science, otoh, remains deeply mysterious to them.

 

Nihil

(13,508 posts)
4. Well this morning's reading is off to a good start ...
Tue Jun 3, 2014, 04:26 AM
Jun 2014

Jane Goodall trying to get the Australian government to get their collective heads out of the sand.

Canadian meteorologists being told to shut up by their government and not to mention "climate".

American government "science committee" showing their arse hanging out of their trousers by complaining
that a scientist cannot accurately summarise climate change within the 10 second attention span of their
audience.

Ostriches going 3/3 so far.

When the elected leaders of major countries are being this fucking stupid despite all of the science,
the research and the warnings, no wonder that the ordinary people aren't sufficiently concerned ...



NickB79

(19,233 posts)
5. It's probably not a good idea to argue science with a guy named Oppenheimer
Tue Jun 3, 2014, 03:43 PM
Jun 2014

Oh wait, you have to give a flying fuck about science in the first place to realize the significance of that name to begin with.

Bill USA

(6,436 posts)
6. notes from the GOP parallel universe. Who needs reality when you can make up an imaginary world of
Tue Jun 3, 2014, 08:56 PM
Jun 2014

your own liking.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»House Science Cmte. Decla...