Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Wed Jun 11, 2014, 04:46 AM Jun 2014

Coal Company CEO Threatens To Sue EPA For ‘Lying’ About Climate Change

http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2014/06/10/3447370/murray-coal-warming-is-fake/


Robert E. Murray, of Murray Energy Corp., speaks during a news conference Tuesday, Aug. 7, 2007.


The owner of the largest independent coal producer in the U.S. is threatening to sue the Environmental Protection Agency over its new regulations on carbon emissions from existing coal plants, saying the agency has been lying about the existence of global warming, and that the earth is actually getting colder.

In an extended profile published last month, Murray Energy Corp. founder Robert Murray told WV Executive that the EPA’s claims that climate change exists violates the federal Data Quality Act, which requires agencies to rely on quality, objective information to inform its decisions.

“Under the act, they are obligated to tell the truth, and they are not telling the truth about global warming,” Murray reportedly said. “They are not telling hardly any truth about the science. The earth has actually cooled over the last 17 years, so under the Data Quality Act, they’ve actually been lying about so-called global warming.”

Murray added, “This lawsuit will force them to not just take data from the environmentalists and publish it, as they have been doing, but to review that data and make sure it’s accurate.”
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Coal Company CEO Threatens To Sue EPA For ‘Lying’ About Climate Change (Original Post) xchrom Jun 2014 OP
I've got the popcorn. silverweb Jun 2014 #1
this should be good. nt xchrom Jun 2014 #2
Indeed! silverweb Jun 2014 #4
pleasepleasepleasepleasepleaseplease DetlefK Jun 2014 #3
Isn't that the same asshat whose failure to follow safety regs Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2014 #5
The very same . . . who was then fellated live on TV by Fox, who felt so sorry for him hatrack Jun 2014 #6
The "last 17 years" bit is the tipoff. Keep an eye out for it. Jim Lane Jun 2014 #7

silverweb

(16,402 posts)
4. Indeed!
Wed Jun 11, 2014, 05:33 AM
Jun 2014

[font color="navy" face="Verdana"]I just can't wait for Murray's "evidence" to be presented.



Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
5. Isn't that the same asshat whose failure to follow safety regs
Wed Jun 11, 2014, 07:08 AM
Jun 2014

got a lot of miners killed at one of his mines a few years back?

hatrack

(59,584 posts)
6. The very same . . . who was then fellated live on TV by Fox, who felt so sorry for him
Wed Jun 11, 2014, 07:56 AM
Jun 2014

Poor, poor coal CEO.

Seriously, though, I hope he sues and pisses away millions of dollars in legal fees.

 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
7. The "last 17 years" bit is the tipoff. Keep an eye out for it.
Wed Jun 11, 2014, 01:46 PM
Jun 2014

These people love to obfuscate the difference between weather and climate, the latter being long-term. Within an overall long-term warming trend, there will be year-to-year fluctuations. It's not a smooth line going up (like, say, U.S. population); it's a jagged line that goes up and down from year to year but in the long term trends upward. In statistical terms, it's a random walk with an upward drift.

The deniers choose their time period to make their point by starting with 1998. That year was one of the upward spikes on the line (generally thought to have been caused by an El Nino event). It's as if, today, I found an unusually hot day in April, started the analysis then, and showed a cooling trend from that baseline, thus "disproving" the hoax that average temperatures in the Northern Hemisphere increase from April to June.

This scam has been debunked for years. CBS did this good analysis in 2009. Key point:

Statisticians say that in sizing up climate change, it's important to look at moving averages of about 10 years. They compare the average of 1999-2008 to the average of 2000-2009. In all data sets, 10-year moving averages have been higher in the last five years than in any previous years.


It's also worth noting that, in 2009, the skeptics were basing their argument on changes since 1998. If they were being consistent, they would today be using the same lookback period -- but that would mean they'd lose 1998. That's why we see this coal company guy now pulling a 17-year period out of the air. They'll keep adjusting their lookback period so that they can start with 1998, because that helps them distort the overall trend.
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Coal Company CEO Threaten...