Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gregorian

(23,867 posts)
Wed Jun 11, 2014, 05:23 PM Jun 2014

Surprising Population Analysis

Recently I discovered something that I feel is a massive game changing discovery. I'm posting a video that is set at the time where an Australian biologist presents a finding he made regarding human population. In it he describes how he set up parameters to model all of the trends related human growth and fertility, etc. in order to model what would happen were we to have a worldwide one child policy. In it he finds that given historical trends, in 90 years we would still have the same number of people on earth as we have today!

I also recently had a correspondence with Paul Ehrlich, which was very fulfilling, if not depressing as I discovered he has the same degree of anxiety as I regarding the situation revolving around finding ways to change the behavior of people in order to turn our environmental situation around. This is the task that ultimately we are faced with accomplishing. I say this since we know that humans are a retroactive species. Until now we have only had to concern ourselves with survival from the environment. However, now we are in a fight against ourselves. I'm also seeing that denial is playing a massive role not just in those who actively deny knowledge, but in those who are fully aware and yet who choose not to take responsibility. The problem we are facing is one of personal responsibility, and the reason why it is considered "inconvenient".

Since much of our behavior will not change, population is the only way out of this crisis. At first I thought that changing population was now an impossibility, and all we had at our disposal is engineering. Of course it's both. But not really. What I mean is that if we are to, for example, have anesthetics with dental work, then we must have everything that supports it: transportation, manufacturing, and all of the peripheral things like bearings, gears, glass, rubber, mining... You don't get a break if you're going to live in a modern way. It's either modern living with a smaller population that doesn't have the dire consequences, or have what we have now- melting ice sheets and a myriad of disasters.

Take a look at the video, as there are a few more revelations that are not intuitive. Population is a very inconvenient topic of discussion, but since it is at the very foundation of all of the issues we're facing, it must be addressed. We're truly running out of time to start turning this around. Look at every issue you see on this forum and ask if population had a major part in it.

The key points are that we cannot simply rely on engineering alone. AND we are literally in an emergency situation that demands action on all fronts right now.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=r8mEMxDRU9Q#t=5022

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Surprising Population Analysis (Original Post) Gregorian Jun 2014 OP
China instituted a one child policy in 1979 OnlinePoker Jun 2014 #1
And they've also been exporting lots of people to other countries in that time ... Nihil Jun 2014 #2

OnlinePoker

(5,719 posts)
1. China instituted a one child policy in 1979
Wed Jun 11, 2014, 10:03 PM
Jun 2014

35 years later, and the Chinese population is around 400 million people higher.

 

Nihil

(13,508 posts)
2. And they've also been exporting lots of people to other countries in that time ...
Thu Jun 12, 2014, 08:01 AM
Jun 2014

... so the true population increase is higher still.

.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Surprising Population Ana...