Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumWorld Heritage Committee Takes 10 Minutes To Dump Australia's Plan To Drop Forest Protections
The UNESCO World Heritage Committee today unanimously rejected a controversial proposal by the Australian government to strip 74,000 hectares of temperate rainforest from a World Heritage Site in Tasmania. In an embarrassing setback for the Australia government, it took the committee less than ten minutes to unanimously reject the proposal, according to the Guardian.
The 74,000 hectares in question were a part of a so-called "peace deal" between environmentalists and loggers in Tasmania, which added 170,000 hectares to an existing World Heritage site. The government contended that much of the forest was degraded, yet experts disagreed. In fact, the IUCN found that 85 percent of the 74,000 hectares was natural forest and nearly half of the whole was old-growth forest. The IUCN recommended that the committee reject the proposal.
"Today is vindication for every Australian, and people around the world, who love Tasmanias forests and want to see them protected," said World Heritage expert Alec Marr in response to the decision. "The World Heritage Committee has today upheld the integrity of the Convention and Australia needs to respect its obligations to the Convention."
The former leader of Australia Green party, Bob Brown, blasted the current government for its attempt to shrink the World Heritage Site. "[Prime Minister] Tony Abbott lied about the forests being degraded. That lie has been rejected at international level. It is a diplomatic fiasco for the Prime Minister and Australia. However, it is a win for global diplomatic propriety," Brown said in a statement adding, "This is the lowest point in the history of Australian environmental diplomacy. Abbott's failed mission has sullied the nation's great history of upholding the World Heritage Convention."
EDIT
http://news.mongabay.com/2014/0623-hance-australia-world-heritage-rejected.html
Gman
(24,780 posts)No one knows anyone that voted for Abbot these days.
hatrack
(59,386 posts)Seriously, though, how did this world-class buffoon become Prime Minister? It sure as hell wasn't his engaging, sparkling personality.
Gman
(24,780 posts)Who kept shooting itself in the foot and didn't have it's act together. No one liked Abbot but they figured they could live with him for a few years. They realize the mistake now.