Last edited Fri Oct 2, 2015, 11:50 PM - Edit history (1)
It is a snapshot of an ongoing process of change, not a final report on the decarbonization effort. A well known feature of how change occurs tells us that there is a very real and significant snowball effect.
It works like this:
Policies are crafted that set goals for change.
Those policies are often couched incrementally, either by partial goals or by staged implementation.
Contrary to intuitive thinking, what happens is that affected entities tend to 'see the writing on the wall and react more to the policy as evidence of the inevitability of the ultimate change than as a statement of what is the minimum effort to just get by.
The competitive world presses them to look for ways to benefit from the changes that are coming.
This, in turn, prompts them to become early adopters of complete change.
So even though the goals looked at in the study are viewed as low, the ultimate significance just establishing these global goals is, without doubt, far greater than the numbers in the goals indicate.
All of that said, it is still important to take these snapshots, monitor progress, and push for higher goals.