Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

soryang

(3,299 posts)
Tue Jan 22, 2019, 04:14 PM Jan 2019

WP: Trump's dual Korean challenges: Talks with North and U.S. troop payment impasse with South

WP: Trump’s dual Korean challenges: Talks with North and U.S. troop payment impasse with South

By Simon Denyer January 20

“I don’t think they will ever ask the U.S. to withdraw,” said Chun, the conservative former national security adviser, referring to officials in Moon’s entourage. “But if President Trump decides to withdraw because of this cost issue, I don’t think any of them will cry over that kind of decision.”

The question of the share South Korea is paying depends on your vantage point.

The United States says Seoul pays $855 million out of a total cost of about $2 billion. South Korea says that doesn’t account for the large amount of land supplied rent-free and calculates it pays more like 70 percent of the cost.

Seoul also paid almost the entire cost of building a massive new U.S. base at Pyeongtaek and spent $13 billion between 2013 and 2017 on U.S. military hardware, training and services.


more:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/trumps-dual-korean-challenges-talks-with-north-and-us-troop-payment-impasse-with-south/2019/01/19/dd9a875e-18d5-11e9-b8e6-567190c2fd08_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.62cf1033cfc8


According to one South Korean Channel A News broadcast today this impasse between the ROK and the US offers the spectre of a potential impetuous action of Trump using US troop withdrawal as a "card" at a summit with North Korea's Kim Jong Un. This unsettling prospect is being used as a means to put pressure on South Korea to come up with more than one trillion won annual expenditure in support of US troops and operations. That outcome isn't likely. One of the analysts said the Trump tactic appeared to be like grabbing two rabbits at one time.
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
WP: Trump's dual Korean challenges: Talks with North and U.S. troop payment impasse with South (Original Post) soryang Jan 2019 OP
OMGosh! I hadn't thought of US soldiers stationed KCDebbie Jan 2019 #1
The troops get paid, this is negotiation on cost sharing soryang Jan 2019 #2
 

KCDebbie

(664 posts)
1. OMGosh! I hadn't thought of US soldiers stationed
Tue Jan 22, 2019, 05:56 PM
Jan 2019

In places other than war zones being penniless! At least in Korea soldiers aren't allowed to take their families there.

Does the US still have soldiers with families on England, Germany, France and Italy?

soryang

(3,299 posts)
2. The troops get paid, this is negotiation on cost sharing
Tue Jan 22, 2019, 06:50 PM
Jan 2019

So the headline is unintentionally misleading in that respect.

Some of the armed forces there are accompanied, like staff officers and support personnel assigned for longer tours in South Korea. It's a minority of assigned forces. I don't know anything about the situation with other allies.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Foreign Affairs»WP: Trump's dual Korean c...