Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Foreign Affairs
Related: About this forumWP: Trump's dual Korean challenges: Talks with North and U.S. troop payment impasse with South
WP: Trumps dual Korean challenges: Talks with North and U.S. troop payment impasse with South
By Simon Denyer January 20
I dont think they will ever ask the U.S. to withdraw, said Chun, the conservative former national security adviser, referring to officials in Moons entourage. But if President Trump decides to withdraw because of this cost issue, I dont think any of them will cry over that kind of decision.
The question of the share South Korea is paying depends on your vantage point.
The United States says Seoul pays $855 million out of a total cost of about $2 billion. South Korea says that doesnt account for the large amount of land supplied rent-free and calculates it pays more like 70 percent of the cost.
Seoul also paid almost the entire cost of building a massive new U.S. base at Pyeongtaek and spent $13 billion between 2013 and 2017 on U.S. military hardware, training and services.
The question of the share South Korea is paying depends on your vantage point.
The United States says Seoul pays $855 million out of a total cost of about $2 billion. South Korea says that doesnt account for the large amount of land supplied rent-free and calculates it pays more like 70 percent of the cost.
Seoul also paid almost the entire cost of building a massive new U.S. base at Pyeongtaek and spent $13 billion between 2013 and 2017 on U.S. military hardware, training and services.
more:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/trumps-dual-korean-challenges-talks-with-north-and-us-troop-payment-impasse-with-south/2019/01/19/dd9a875e-18d5-11e9-b8e6-567190c2fd08_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.62cf1033cfc8
According to one South Korean Channel A News broadcast today this impasse between the ROK and the US offers the spectre of a potential impetuous action of Trump using US troop withdrawal as a "card" at a summit with North Korea's Kim Jong Un. This unsettling prospect is being used as a means to put pressure on South Korea to come up with more than one trillion won annual expenditure in support of US troops and operations. That outcome isn't likely. One of the analysts said the Trump tactic appeared to be like grabbing two rabbits at one time.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 587 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
WP: Trump's dual Korean challenges: Talks with North and U.S. troop payment impasse with South (Original Post)
soryang
Jan 2019
OP
KCDebbie
(664 posts)1. OMGosh! I hadn't thought of US soldiers stationed
In places other than war zones being penniless! At least in Korea soldiers aren't allowed to take their families there.
Does the US still have soldiers with families on England, Germany, France and Italy?
soryang
(3,299 posts)2. The troops get paid, this is negotiation on cost sharing
So the headline is unintentionally misleading in that respect.
Some of the armed forces there are accompanied, like staff officers and support personnel assigned for longer tours in South Korea. It's a minority of assigned forces. I don't know anything about the situation with other allies.