Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

unhappycamper

(60,364 posts)
Fri Jun 13, 2014, 07:35 AM Jun 2014

Clear the ambiguity over joining MD

http://koreajoongangdaily.joins.com/news/article/article.aspx?aid=2990388



Clear the ambiguity over joining MD
모호한 대처 곤란한 미사일방어체제 논란

Including Korea in the United States’ missile defense system (MD) is being discussed again. As the United States considers deploying Thaad (Terminal High-Altitude Area Defense) with the U.S. Forces in Korea, the old controversy has resurfaced. The ROK Forces made it clear that Korea’s plan to build an independent missile defense system is unchanged regardless of Thaad. However, China warned that accepting Thaad in Korea would damage its relations with China, putting Seoul in an awkward position.

As I cover Washington politics, I often feel that the United States has become extremely prudent in its dealings with other countries. It very rarely makes incomplete information public. Seoul has requested another delay on the transfer of wartime operational control, but Washington has only said that it would be determined after various conditions are reviewed. On the prospect of talks with North Korea, Washington consistently has said, “The ball is in North Korea’s court.”

So when The Wall Street Journal reported last month that the USFK has conducted a site search to introduce Thaad and has a plan to sell it to Korea in the future, I expected a clarification from the U.S. Department of Defense. Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel and many other military insiders emphasized the importance of a joint missile defense between the United States, Korea and Japan. Director Peppino Debiaso of the Defense Department’s Office of Missile Defense Policy said that the Korean government has inquired into the performance and price of Thaad, refuting the Korean defense ministry’s claim that there had been no discussion.

So it is reasonable to believe that Washington is sending a message. While Washington claims that the final decision has not been made and that it is up to the South Korean government, it is practically highlighting its special focus on building a Korea-U.S.-Japan missile defense system.
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Foreign Affairs»Clear the ambiguity over ...