Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

unhappycamper

(60,364 posts)
Sat Jun 21, 2014, 08:00 AM Jun 2014

Reviving the Myth of the "Successful Surge"

http://smirkingchimp.com/thread/robert-parry/56503/reviving-the-myth-of-the-successful-surge

Reviving the Myth of the "Successful Surge"
by Robert Parry | June 20, 2014 - 8:59am

A beloved myth of Official Washington – especially among Republicans, neocons and other supporters of the Iraq War – is the fable of the “successful surge,” how President George W. Bush’s heroic escalation of 30,000 troops in 2007 supposedly “won” that war; it then follows that the current Iraq disaster must be President Barack Obama’s fault.

The appeal of this myth should be obvious. Nearly every “important” person in the U.S. foreign policy establishment and the mainstream media endorsed the illegal invasion of Iraq in 2003 — and such well-placed and well-paid people do not like to admit that their judgment was so bad that they should be disqualified from holding any responsible position forever.

Further, since almost no one who promoted this criminal and bloody enterprise was held accountable after Mission Accomplished wasn’t, these opinion leaders were still around in 2007 at the time of the “surge” and thus in a position to cite any positive trends as proof of “success.” Many are still around voicing their august opinions – the likes of Sen. John McCain, former Vice President Dick Cheney and neocon theorist Robert Kagan – so they still get to tell the rest of us how really great their judgment was.

On Wednesday, McCain fulminated from the Senate floor, accusing Obama of squandering the “surge,” the success of which he deemed a “fact.” Cheney – along with his daughter Liz – accused the President of “securing his legacy as the man who betrayed our past and squandered our freedom.”
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Reviving the Myth of the "Successful Surge" (Original Post) unhappycamper Jun 2014 OP
I don't understand why Obama (or any Dem) wanted to be president after the Bush clusterfuck tularetom Jun 2014 #1
I don't think he knew how difficult It would be AAO Jun 2014 #2

tularetom

(23,664 posts)
1. I don't understand why Obama (or any Dem) wanted to be president after the Bush clusterfuck
Sat Jun 21, 2014, 10:30 AM
Jun 2014

He had to know that two terms would never be enough to clean up the mess left by that gang of fools and that he would get blamed for the whole thing by the actual perps and their buddies in the liberal media.

I mean, hell, if I saw this coming, the president, presumably a hell of a lot smarter than I am, sure as shit should have. Is he so naive he didn't believe it would get this bad? Or so cynical he just wanted to set himself up to make a lot of money after he left the White House and didn't care about getting blamed for the fuckups?

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Foreign Affairs»Reviving the Myth of the ...