Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

shira

(30,109 posts)
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 07:11 PM Jun 2014

Ha’aretz playing into anti-Semites’ hands

Under the title “Netanyahu playing into anti-Semites’ hands,” Ha’aretz opinion writer Carolina Landsmann makes a convincing case that the paper she works for is determined to compete with the often anti-Semitic websites that cater to anti-Israel activists and outright Jew-haters. Landsmann begins her not particularly coherent column by mocking the Israeli prime minister’s efforts to have good relations with countries in Asia and Africa. Miss Landsmann’s comment on this diplomatically and economically sound approach: “The West repudiates us? Let’s recreate ourselves in the East (at least until they realize who we are).”

Right, Miss Landsmann: maybe Jews can pretend for a while to be different than they really are, but truly, who would want anything to do with them once it becomes clear who the Jews really are?


<snip>

A Ha’aretz editorial on the same day argued:

“Netanyahu, the last of the demagogues, seized on one of the survey’s findings, which states that the place with the highest level of anti-Semitism is the Palestinian Authority areas, where 93 percent of adults allegedly hold anti-Semitic views. Of course that finding can, and should, be explained in the context of the Israeli occupation that’s going on for 47 years; an occupation in which hundreds of thousands of Jews settled on lands that are not part of the State of Israel; an occupation under which thousands of Palestinians were killed and hundreds of thousands jailed; an occupation that prevents the Palestinians from living comfortably and with dignity.”


In their eagerness to justify antisemitism, the Ha’aretz writers inevitably provided a general justification for bigotry: Have you or anyone you know ever been harmed in any way by a Muslim/Arab/immigrant? If so, it’s fine to hate Muslims/Arabs/immigrants – and if anyone calls you a racist, tell them that the political correctness of your bigotry has been certified by Israel’s famously progressive paper Ha’aretz.

http://blogs.jpost.com/content/ha%E2%80%99aretz-playing-anti-semites%E2%80%99-hands
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

4now

(1,596 posts)
1. Everyone who dissagrees with the ultra right government of Netanyahu must be anti-semitic
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 08:36 PM
Jun 2014

This is what the right wing does. Sounds like the right wing nuts in this country.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
4. er...u lose yr grip on reality?(btw, "u"? was Prince your high school English teacher or something)?
Wed Jun 11, 2014, 06:33 AM
Jun 2014

Nothing in Landsmann's column was bigoted.

And she's right to object to Netanyahu's cynical and arrogant insistence that Israel is synonymous with everything and everyone
that happens to be Jewish. Israel does not equal "the Jews&quot or "the jooz", as you like to pretend that everyone who offers even the mildest criques of Israeli government policy says the word...in accordance with your pointless and offensive obsession with labeling any critic of the Israeli government, other than those who want it to be MORE brutal and oppressive towards Palestinians, as "antisemites&quot .

You're going to have to accept, at some point, that its possible to oppose the Occupation and the settler movement without being a Nazi. Most of us who do offer such critiques, whether in the Israeli left-peace and justice community, the nonviolent wing of the Palestinian resistance that most Western media refuses to cover, or in the progressive communities in Europe, the UK and North America, do so because, whatever national arrangements we might favor for the area, we want the killing and the oppression and the misery suffered by all concerned to end. We aren't monsters and we don't want anybody to suffer.

Why do you waste so much time and energy starting demonization and anti-dissent threads on this issue? What goood would come of everybody doing what you want and supporting everything Netanyahu does? How would silencing discussion and debate on this issue, as you seem to be relentlessly fixated on doing, make anything better at all?


Why do you, in short, participate in a discussion group on this topic if you don't think anyone should actually discuss it at all?

Israelis freely discuss all of these issues all the time...why shouldn't people in the country that arms the IDF be able to do the same without being accused of a prejudice you know perfectly well we don't hold?

 

shira

(30,109 posts)
7. Landesmann's column was definitely bigoted, for reasons given in the OP....
Sun Jun 22, 2014, 09:11 AM
Jun 2014

She followed it up with this trash:

http://www.haaretz.com/opinion/.premium-1.597237

Israel’s moral retirement
Feeling they have accumulated a moral fortune, the Jews feel free to lecture the world while doing what they please.
By Carolina Landsmann | Jun. 6, 2014 | 6:45 AM | 10

==================

Ken,
To answer your question, there's a way to criticize Israel w/o bringing in bigoted canards. You cannot expect good people to ignore blatantly bigoted hostility towards Jews and the Jewish state.

 

shira

(30,109 posts)
8. More from Haaretz; racist bigotry vs. black security officer at airport...
Sun Jun 22, 2014, 09:15 AM
Jun 2014
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1134&pid=63894

The author describes the security guard questioning him...

"Ophir was a young, darkish security man, perhaps a descendant of converts from the Arabian Peninsula, perhaps from the Atlas Mountains. But one thing was clear, his black color looked very shabby, tattered and stained with evil."


Worse, Amos Schocken defended this racist garbage on Twitter:
https://twitter.com/AmosSchocken1/status/474955196297392128

They're not even pretending anymore.
 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
5. What Palestinians feel towards Israel
Wed Jun 11, 2014, 07:00 AM
Jun 2014

Last edited Wed Jun 11, 2014, 11:44 PM - Edit history (1)

is what any occupied people feelsl against their occupiers. Are you really saying that it's bigotry to resent having another country's army swaggering through your country's streets? Are you really saying Palestinians have no legitimate reasons to despise the settlers who drive them off their lands, steal their olive trees, and divert most of the water?

Is it any more bigoted for Palestinians to have harsh feelings towards Israelis than it was for the ancient Israelites to say and feel harsh things about the Romans back in the day? Or for the Lakota to be less than charitable about the U.S. Cavalry and the white settlers? Or for Africans, Hindus and Muslims of the subcontinent, or the Irish, Welsh and Scots t be less than heartbroken about how tough it was to be a British soldier or colonial in the days of the Empire? And is it really a reasonable thing to expect Palestinians to believe, as you apparently think they should feel obligated to believe, that even today, even in the present situation, the majority population of Israel has it WORSE than they do and has the right to claim to be the real victims in this conflict?

It's not bigotry to despise the nation that oppresses you.

 

shira

(30,109 posts)
6. You're confusing anti-Israel views with anti-Jewish bigotry...
Sun Jun 22, 2014, 09:05 AM
Jun 2014

The poll discussed in the OP shows 93% of Palestinians have bigoted, antisemitic views of Jews.

There's no defending that.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
9. You're EQUATING Anti-Israel views with anti-Jewish bigotry, as you do over and over and over again
Mon Jun 23, 2014, 11:09 AM
Jun 2014

What Palestinians feel is hostility towards an oppressor nation. If this one survey that you keep dredging up shows Palestinians expressing hostility towards "Jews", rather than "Israelis", that's most likely the result of the demagogic habit of Israeli prime ministers of all parties have had of referring to Israel, as a country, as "the Jews&quot something they have no right to do, since Israel is simply a country that calls itself "a Jewish state and is not interchangeable with Jewish people as a collective entity, or with Judaism as a religion or a collection of cultures). The anger is towards the state and its actions...period.

And is also partly rooted in resentment, most likely, for that nation's leaders' insistence that Palestinians should accept the idea that, even since 1967, they should accept the idea that Israelis are the true victims in that conflict...something even you, in your heart of hearts, know is simply not true.

Besides, if what you said were true, if it was bigotry, how would keeping Palestine under military occupation ever possibly make that bigotry go away? It's not possible to oppress bigots into tolerance.

 

shira

(30,109 posts)
10. Ken, they were asked about Jews. There's no defending such antisemitic views.
Mon Jun 23, 2014, 11:22 AM
Jun 2014

Christians are persecuted throughout the mideast under harsh Islamist rule. Do the Christians who hate Muslims get a pass for their bigotry against since the hostility they feel is really towards their oppressor?

Yes or No?

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
12. Possibly.
Mon Jun 23, 2014, 11:36 AM
Jun 2014

I'll have to admit that I've never actually thought about that.

I'd say that, in both cases, it is actually hostility towards an oppressor masked as bigotry.

And remember here that, in Arabic, the word "Yahood" has been typically used to mean both "Jews" and "Israelis".

Do you believe it's reasonable for Israeli leaders to expect Palestinians to accept the idea that, in the post-1948 era, and especially the post-1967 era, that Israelis are the REAL victims in the I/P conflict(I'm not talking about how Jews were treated in Europe prior to 1945-that is totally separate from this conflict, and Palestinians bear no responsibility for those two millennia of persecution and brutality, as I would assume even you would concede)?

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
11. What does this all mean to the current Israeli government? Let me guess, no withdrawal from
Mon Jun 23, 2014, 11:25 AM
Jun 2014

the West Bank etc etc. More bullshit excuses to keep land that DOES NOT BELONG TO THEM.

Dopey OP.

 

shira

(30,109 posts)
14. It means that bigoted hostility towards Jews & their state will keep falling on deaf ears...
Mon Jun 23, 2014, 01:01 PM
Jun 2014

Keep the criticism leveled and legitimate, without the bigoted tropes, and there will be a much better chance of moving forward.

Why is this so difficult to comprehend?

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
15. Nothing too difficult to understand, as you conflate all Jews with Israeli Jews.
Mon Jun 23, 2014, 01:23 PM
Jun 2014

Where in the OP is there a demonstration of arab/muslim hatred? What
is the plan..all these people on both sides are going to be asked to leave?

When you set out to prove yourself the only victim and justify an occupation
as a result of it...people will tune you out.

Israel needs to end the occupation, period.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
13. By "we" Landsmann clearly meant Israel's government, not "The Jews".
Mon Jun 23, 2014, 11:38 AM
Jun 2014

Please stop acting like the two are interchangeable.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Israel/Palestine»Ha’aretz playing into ant...