Which Israel should do pronto because of course Chomsky has Israel's best interests at heart ..LOL

That makes sense...keep laughing too.

To stop explosives and arms from reaching the terrorists in Gaza still he'll bent on killing innocent Jewish civilians...

Luckily Egypt is opening the border and will probably monitor for arms and explosives.

Chomsky a war monger?, no. Having Israel's best interests at heart or caring what happens to Jewish civilians if they blown up or hit by rockets ? NO

shooting their kids, keep expanding settlements.

Chomsky has always had the best interest of people at the forefront..not one side.

If Hamas terror incorporated were allowed unfettered access to explosives ?
In the Palestinian Authorities lingo it would be killing season on all the "Christ Killers"
( more than usual)

As far as Chomsky is concerned why would a rabid anti Zionist think he has any advice for the Jewish State and they would accept it from someone who certainly does not wish Israel well in any manner or form.

and the Israeli government.

Imagine Israeli policy following international law, the occupation would have been
over, long before Hamas came to power. I will remind you that the unrelenting
settlement expansion and the IDF shooting Palestinians when there have been
no rockets brings forth evidence of Israels plan to make their lives a living hell.

Horseshit.

But it's important to us when innocent Jews are being murdered.

Not so long ago us Jews and Gays.. we went like lambs , since 1948 we been very strong and no longer like lambs to the slaughter.

That is how the world sees the Israeli government...ask Kerry.

What an insult to Kerry.
He is the last person anyone ever would think of as being Bigoted and certainly not against Jews-- Never !

expressing to you.

You're embarrassing yourself.

He actually is an honest broker.

His motivations a pure, he's not a part of this or obsessed with this conflict just because Jews are involved . That's the part that's different from some posters in forums such as these and other extremist forums such as David Dukes or the UNHRC .

occupation.

Kerry knows and is on the record regarding Israel's intransigence.

Read up.

Occupation and apartheid are mutually exclusive. Either you believe that WB Palestinians are really oppressed Israelis. And that their state is not legitimate as a sovereign nation. (Apartheid.) Or you believe that Israel is occupying the land of another people. You can't have both.

Better late than never I suppose.

Then again, he may just be having second thoughts about what it would mean to be subject to the authority of the International Court of Justice.

something that 'rumor' has it Israel has now changed it's mind about and refuses to do

advisory ruling of any outcome in their favor would be close to zero.

EVER at ANY international forum is zero.

Any UNHRC council,ICC,UN ...ANY

After all Israel is the Jewish State.

a Holocaust survivor. You need a new slogan...Israel is responsible for their situation, they
refuse to end the occupation with Kerry even when the deal worked out to their advantage,
even with Abbas ready to concede too much..Israel conceded NOTHING.

It is all part of the record.

Nothin new here ...

The great Abba Ebban said about the UN :
“If Algeria introduced a resolution declaring that the earth was flat and that Israel had flattened it, it would pass by a vote of 164 to 13 with 26 abstentions.”

I understand...the Israeli government needs those excuses to defend the occupation.

Ask Kerry, he'll explain it to you. His OP's are all over DU..read up.

Good luck.

Which is why groups like the UNHRC seem SOOO interested in states that don't happen to be Israel. Because Israel is clearly the worst state on the planet. It only makes sense for ethical states like Libya and Syria to sit on human rights panels that condemn Israel almost exclusively. Because those rulings are clearly issued without bias.