Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
Sun Jun 22, 2014, 10:15 AM Jun 2014

Jewish groups anticipate rupture after Presbyterians vote to divest in protest of Israel

'Decision will undoubtedly have a devastating impact on relations between mainstream Jewish groups and the national Presbyterian Church,' says president of the Jewish Council for Public Affairs.

By JTA | Jun. 21, 2014 | 9:34 PM

Jewish groups predicted a rupture with Presbyterians in the wake of a close vote favoring divestment from three companies that deal with Israel’s security forces in the West Bank.

The Presbyterian Church-USA biennial General Assembly approved the measure 310-303 late Friday evening after hours of at times emotional debate. The resolution divests from three companies, Caterpillar, Motorola Solutions and Hewlett-Packard. A similar resolution was narrowly defeated at the last biennial in 2012.

Some of the delegates promoting the resolution were at pains to distance it from the boycott, divestment and sanctions movement, noting that it targeted only American companies profiting from West Bank security systems, and successfully added amendments making the distinction clear.

Others said that the resolution, coupled with an anti-Zionist tract released earlier this year by a church committee, allied the church with groups that seek to dismantle Israel.

http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/1.600237
98 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Jewish groups anticipate rupture after Presbyterians vote to divest in protest of Israel (Original Post) Jefferson23 Jun 2014 OP
'Mainstream Jewish groups' elleng Jun 2014 #1
Agreed..maybe that will evolve, ellen. I hope so too. n/t Jefferson23 Jun 2014 #2
That's to be expected when you let anti-Semitic fanatics hijack your agenda. Fozzledick Jun 2014 #3
Jeffrey Goldberg asks PCUSA.... shira Jun 2014 #4
FYI, the occupation is 47 years strong...and no end in sight. Goldberg is a tool for Bibi, yay Jefferson23 Jun 2014 #5
China & Turkey have occupied Tibet & Cyprus for many decades.... shira Jun 2014 #6
shira, nonsense...the documented record states otherwise. Jefferson23 Jun 2014 #8
So to answer Goldberg, PCUSA doesn't divest from any other country. shira Jun 2014 #11
Uh huh...keep repeating whatever Goldberg has to say. Goldberg is a tool for Bibi, period. n/t Jefferson23 Jun 2014 #17
This message was self-deleted by its author thucythucy Jun 2014 #54
That's because it's a Jewish reason for this and not an Israel reason, King_David Jun 2014 #7
Yea, it could not possibly be almost 50 years of occupation as the motivation..nah. Jefferson23 Jun 2014 #9
That's nonsense , King_David Jun 2014 #10
You have a twisted notion of what strong equates to...keep those headphones on, real loud. n/t Jefferson23 Jun 2014 #16
We used to be weak King_David Jun 2014 #22
Jews were NEVER weak, and you don't speak for all Jews..try and remember that as you Jefferson23 Jun 2014 #23
Of course I don't speak for any Jews King_David Jun 2014 #25
You don't speak for all, try and remember that as you lay out your false opinions about Jefferson23 Jun 2014 #27
And yes we were weak King_David Jun 2014 #26
Disgusting...you don't even understand history. n/t Jefferson23 Jun 2014 #28
The Jewish nation has existed for Thousands of years King_David Jun 2014 #30
Jews were NEVER weak, that you continue to push this falsehood in order to blame Jews Jefferson23 Jun 2014 #34
If course most Jews do... King_David Jun 2014 #35
If course, most Jews do? What does that triangulation mean? Yes, you have family and or Jefferson23 Jun 2014 #36
omg 2banon Jun 2014 #37
Besides that strange reply King_David Jun 2014 #41
Nothing strange about the reply, it is appropriate given your alleged understanding of history. n/t Jefferson23 Jun 2014 #43
weak people do not survive for thousands of years azurnoir Jun 2014 #44
We changed in 1948 King_David Jun 2014 #45
Jews were never weak before 1948. n/t Jefferson23 Jun 2014 #47
Jews are no longer weak King_David Jun 2014 #48
Your grandparents?? You're blaiming your twisted views on them..interesting. Jefferson23 Jun 2014 #49
Not MY twisted views, King_David Jun 2014 #50
FACT? No, this is most likely your fanatatical nationalism for Israeli policy that you blame Jews Jefferson23 Jun 2014 #51
Of course not King_David Jun 2014 #52
I speak for me. You should try it sometime. n/t Jefferson23 Jun 2014 #53
Actually a lot if you guys King_David Jun 2014 #56
You guys, what does that mean? You don't know me. I speak for myself. Jefferson23 Jun 2014 #57
Of course I don't speak for all Jews King_David Jun 2014 #58
You find yourself at a loss to answer a question posed to you. You're the only self elected spokes Jefferson23 Jun 2014 #59
Wasn't talking about you individually King_David Jun 2014 #60
Grouping your complaints while addressing me gives that impression. n/t Jefferson23 Jun 2014 #61
Wrong impression I guess nt King_David Jun 2014 #62
please enumerate those different motivations that you attribute to DUers n/t azurnoir Jun 2014 #63
Nope. nt King_David Jun 2014 #70
why? this is hardly a first either azurnoir Jun 2014 #71
I was talking about some DU posters in IP King_David Jun 2014 #74
Link it, please. n/t Jefferson23 Jun 2014 #82
Link up somebody wanting to destroy the Jewish State? King_David Jun 2014 #84
Again, you make accussations about other DU members, when called on it you avoid and link Jefferson23 Jun 2014 #85
True I do support Israel . King_David Jun 2014 #86
No link to those you're accussing on DU? Policies are governmental, yes. Jefferson23 Jun 2014 #87
Yes I believe the settlements were a huge mistake King_David Jun 2014 #89
They should leave all of the West Bank and East Jerusalem is the capital for the Palestinians. Jefferson23 Jun 2014 #91
What kind of link do you want? King_David Jun 2014 #88
I don't know, you are the one accussing DU members, here: Jefferson23 Jun 2014 #90
Ok so here's one example for you a link King_David Jun 2014 #92
Ok, thanks for the link..he has his opinions. I appreciate it if someone is accussed, please Jefferson23 Jun 2014 #94
... azurnoir Jun 2014 #93
His answer was, nope. All he ever has in his arsenal. n/t Jefferson23 Jun 2014 #75
You edited your post after my reply. You see "we" and "us"? You use that language frequently. Jefferson23 Jun 2014 #67
You do not speak for the USA or "the left" King_David Jun 2014 #68
The left did not protest Viet Nam, the left did not fight for civil rights?? Jefferson23 Jun 2014 #69
LOL King_David Jun 2014 #72
Can't answer the questions. You're quite predictable and I am still speaking for me, yep. n/t Jefferson23 Jun 2014 #73
Ok good so now we are getting somewhere King_David Jun 2014 #76
Still can't or won't answer the questions. Typical of you. n/t Jefferson23 Jun 2014 #77
It was a question about Vietnam ? nt King_David Jun 2014 #78
Still avoiding the conversation. You attempted to attribute a motive, an ulterior motive to people Jefferson23 Jun 2014 #80
do you mean Israel became a heavily armed and extremely militarized state ? azurnoir Jun 2014 #64
The kind of strength King_David Jun 2014 #79
Never again? what about Cambodia, Rwanda, Darfur .......... azurnoir Jun 2014 #81
I said Jews now know that because of Israel King_David Jun 2014 #83
you are aware that Cambodia happened 1975-1979 right? azurnoir Jun 2014 #95
I could be wrong, but I think he is saying, the world does not care about those countries deserving Jefferson23 Jun 2014 #96
I took it as mutial all around not caring azurnoir Jun 2014 #97
As I said it will never again happen to the Jewish King_David Jun 2014 #98
I'm calling you on you BS, king. R. Daneel Olivaw Jun 2014 #19
China's occupation of Tibet has been much longer than 50 years... shira Jun 2014 #12
PCUSA is divesting from Caterpillar, Hewlett-Packard, and Motorola. azurnoir Jun 2014 #13
PCUSA is singularly focused on Israel & no other nation.... shira Jun 2014 #14
once again is PCUSA invested in American companies doing business with China's military azurnoir Jun 2014 #15
American companies do business w/ Turkey's military, so where's PCUSA? n/t shira Jun 2014 #18
Sounds like your answer is lost in the weeds as is usual. R. Daneel Olivaw Jun 2014 #21
I take it the answer about China is no, so about Turkey azurnoir Jun 2014 #38
Ah the broken hasbarista record skips back to the fly-tilla! R. Daneel Olivaw Jun 2014 #20
Do you know any groups for BDS against Israel that target other countries for BDS? shira Jun 2014 #33
well ya look at your own question but I remember the same questions being asked about South Africa azurnoir Jun 2014 #40
Frankly I don't give a crap. This is I/P. R. Daneel Olivaw Jun 2014 #55
Fear of anti-semitism accusation did not stop Presbyterians from witnessing occupation Jefferson23 Jun 2014 #24
Jewish groups would be wise to understand why the Presbyterians took this step... BillZBubb Jun 2014 #29
They don't want to dismantle Israel huh? King_David Jun 2014 #31
From Presbyterians for Middle East Peace: The True Agenda...End of Israel shira Jun 2014 #32
PCUSA is trying to destroy Israel by divesting from American companies? that's an original approach azurnoir Jun 2014 #42
This fact continues to be ignored: Jefferson23 Jun 2014 #46
I've lost count of how many times I've seen any step taken to end the occupation of the West Bank azurnoir Jun 2014 #65
Any step, yes, any group..always an ulterior motive attached. Yay occupation! n/t Jefferson23 Jun 2014 #66
I've been personally attempting to boycott Israeli food and other products/goods imported here.. 2banon Jun 2014 #39

elleng

(130,641 posts)
1. 'Mainstream Jewish groups'
Sun Jun 22, 2014, 10:40 AM
Jun 2014

should get their heads screwed on firmly, and NOT permit their relations with the national Presbyterian Church to be 'devastated.'

Fozzledick

(3,860 posts)
3. That's to be expected when you let anti-Semitic fanatics hijack your agenda.
Sun Jun 22, 2014, 11:46 AM
Jun 2014

I'm looking forward to them dissociating themselves from the "King of Judea" and his West Bank "settler" followers.

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
5. FYI, the occupation is 47 years strong...and no end in sight. Goldberg is a tool for Bibi, yay
Sun Jun 22, 2014, 01:17 PM
Jun 2014

for him. He should be ashamed of himself.

 

shira

(30,109 posts)
6. China & Turkey have occupied Tibet & Cyprus for many decades....
Sun Jun 22, 2014, 01:34 PM
Jun 2014

...with no end in sight.

PCUSA isn't divesting from them.

Unlike China and Turkey, Israel has offered the Palestinians their own homeland many times.

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
8. shira, nonsense...the documented record states otherwise.
Sun Jun 22, 2014, 01:49 PM
Jun 2014

The gig is up, Bibi continues to isolate Israel and most people around the world
recognize why..it is the occupation.

snip* It was Robert M. Gates, the now-retired secretary of defense, who seemed most upset with Netanyahu. In a meeting of the National Security Council Principals Committee held not long before his retirement this summer, Gates coldly laid out the many steps the administration has taken to guarantee Israel’s security — access to top- quality weapons, assistance developing missile-defense systems, high-level intelligence sharing — and then stated bluntly that the U.S. has received nothing in return, particularly with regard to the peace process.

Senior administration officials told me that Gates argued to the president directly that Netanyahu is not only ungrateful, but also endangering his country by refusing to grapple with Israel’s growing isolation and with the demographic challenges it faces if it keeps control of the West Bank. According to these sources, Gates’s analysis met with no resistance from other members of the committee.


http://mondoweiss.net/2011/09/warped-politics-robert-gates-says-israel-is-ungrateful-but-obama-will-still-veto-palestine-un-bid.html

Currently: But the diplomat was also right because US-Israel relations — in particular, the relations between the White House and the prime minister's office in Jerusalem — are at an all-time low, as discussed here in Al-Monitor last week. In this regard, one of the most knowledgeable and experienced people on the White House-Jerusalem axis, told Al-Monitor this week: “Never before has there been such a rupture between an American president and an Israeli prime minister. Right now, there is no communication between President Barack Obama and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The Americans do not want to hear from Netanyahu and the White House shuns any direct or intensive link with the Israeli premier.”

The senior official went further into detail and said the “hotline” that used to exist for many years between US presidents and Israeli prime ministers is out of service. But there's more. Ron Dermer, the Israeli ambassador to Washington, is an unwelcome guest at the White House, and national security adviser Susan Rice would not meet with him at all. Messages are not being communicated regularly. There is no coordination or continuous and close communication. According to the source, the only one who remains welcome at the White House and is able to relay messages is Netanyahu’s special envoy, attorney Yitzhak Molcho. For those needing a reminder, Molcho is a private attorney who is neither a civil servant nor an Israeli official, and whose offices Netanyahu uses on a personal basis. Apart from Molcho, the senior official added, nothing else is going on. A cold, hostile gulf separates the White House from the prime minister's office in Jerusalem.


http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2014/06/abbas-hamas-palestinians-kidnapping-hebron-idf.html#ixzz35HgHpft5
 

shira

(30,109 posts)
11. So to answer Goldberg, PCUSA doesn't divest from any other country.
Sun Jun 22, 2014, 03:24 PM
Jun 2014

The reason is due to bigotry and hatred, as their 'Zionism Unsettled' proves they don't just oppose the occupation/settlements, but are against Israel's very existence.

Response to shira (Reply #4)

King_David

(14,851 posts)
7. That's because it's a Jewish reason for this and not an Israel reason,
Sun Jun 22, 2014, 01:48 PM
Jun 2014

What other countries did they divest from.

It's because it's the Jewish state and anti Zionists think that should not be allowed
( in code form if course)

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
9. Yea, it could not possibly be almost 50 years of occupation as the motivation..nah.
Sun Jun 22, 2014, 01:56 PM
Jun 2014

Keep the volume on your headphones up.

King_David

(14,851 posts)
10. That's nonsense ,
Sun Jun 22, 2014, 02:36 PM
Jun 2014

Before the occupation it was another reason .
And even then people deny Jews are a people, Nationalism is ok or encouraged but Jewish Nationalism or Zionism is racist.

People yearn for the days when Jews were weak. And want reverse it back to the good old days when Jews were weak.

The world just can't allow strong Jews , they fight back and that is just wrong.

King_David

(14,851 posts)
22. We used to be weak
Sun Jun 22, 2014, 06:22 PM
Jun 2014

So weak that every nation used to beat us kill us and murder us.

Nowadays that doesn't happen because we are strong .

And some people hate this about The Jews and they call themselves AntiZionists .

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
23. Jews were NEVER weak, and you don't speak for all Jews..try and remember that as you
Sun Jun 22, 2014, 06:25 PM
Jun 2014

carry on your support for Israeli policy.

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
27. You don't speak for all, try and remember that as you lay out your false opinions about
Sun Jun 22, 2014, 06:30 PM
Jun 2014

weak Jews. That you would place blame on Jews is beyond repugnant.

King_David

(14,851 posts)
26. And yes we were weak
Sun Jun 22, 2014, 06:29 PM
Jun 2014

We were weak in the 1930,s 1940's like lambs to the slaughter.

Never would have happened if we were strong like we are now = Israel .

King_David

(14,851 posts)
30. The Jewish nation has existed for Thousands of years
Sun Jun 22, 2014, 06:46 PM
Jun 2014

We were a very weak people and became an extremely strong people in 1948.

Most of the world can't stomach this.

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
34. Jews were NEVER weak, that you continue to push this falsehood in order to blame Jews
Sun Jun 22, 2014, 07:15 PM
Jun 2014

for their past fate and enable you to defend Israeli policy is disgusting.

Do you have family and or friends living in the OPT?

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
36. If course, most Jews do? What does that triangulation mean? Yes, you have family and or
Sun Jun 22, 2014, 07:45 PM
Jun 2014

friends living in the OPT?

 

2banon

(7,321 posts)
37. omg
Sun Jun 22, 2014, 07:46 PM
Jun 2014

first, please do remove the crown from your self anointed head, and go back and read history.

King_David

(14,851 posts)
41. Besides that strange reply
Sun Jun 22, 2014, 07:59 PM
Jun 2014

Tell me why what I said was wrong ? And it had nothing to do with me in fact and I read plenty history .

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
44. weak people do not survive for thousands of years
Sun Jun 22, 2014, 08:08 PM
Jun 2014

one could get the idea you do not think very highly of Jews prior to 1948

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
49. Your grandparents?? You're blaiming your twisted views on them..interesting.
Sun Jun 22, 2014, 08:40 PM
Jun 2014

Repugnant opinions you hold and history does not back you up in any way shape or form.

All political variables taken into account do not equate with the past fate of the Jews having
occurred because they were weak..amazing you selected that specific language. Pure bullshit.




King_David

(14,851 posts)
50. Not MY twisted views,
Sun Jun 22, 2014, 08:48 PM
Jun 2014

It's fact .

Ask Pelser he will tell you.

I don't quite think that you or Scootaloo are covered in telling us what Jewish mainstream view is even if you guys believe yourselves to speak for the Jewish community.

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
51. FACT? No, this is most likely your fanatatical nationalism for Israeli policy that you blame Jews
Sun Jun 22, 2014, 08:54 PM
Jun 2014

and frame them as weak..it is sickening. Victims are not victims because they were weak.

And what in the hell does Scootaloo have to do with this, why do you keep inserting someone
who is not even in this thread? What are you trying to divert attention away from now?

There is no us, you speak for you..or are you an elected official somewhere speaking for
all Jews?

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
57. You guys, what does that mean? You don't know me. I speak for myself.
Sun Jun 22, 2014, 09:46 PM
Jun 2014

When you speak for Jews as weak you are not only categorically and historically wrong..your
opinions are indicative of a repugnant political agenda. Victims are not to be blamed as weak.

King_David

(14,851 posts)
58. Of course I don't speak for all Jews
Sun Jun 22, 2014, 10:08 PM
Jun 2014

I leave that to some people in this forum that not only consider themselves spokesman of the Jewish people ( I know it sounds just as absurd to me as anyone else) as well as calling Zionists White supremists and rooting for BDS.

And the rest of us who actually are proud Jews and Zionists ( like the majority of the tribe and people ) of course do not speak for anyone except ourselves.

I agree

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
59. You find yourself at a loss to answer a question posed to you. You're the only self elected spokes
Sun Jun 22, 2014, 10:22 PM
Jun 2014

person here that I have witnessed. Your posts are direct evidence of that, with your incessant
use of "we" and "us".

I speak for me, I suggest you do the same. When you try and re-write history, you'll get called out
on it.

You and I agree on nothing on the topic of what constitutes the meaning of weak, regarding Jews.

On edit: Post a link to support your claim I stated Zionists are White supremists, or do you think
your tactics are so slick no one will notice what you're attempting?

King_David

(14,851 posts)
60. Wasn't talking about you individually
Sun Jun 22, 2014, 10:31 PM
Jun 2014

And never said it was .

And I keep telling you that I don't talk or speak for anyone but myself but I do see "we "and "us " because I am a member of the tribe and people of Israel are my people being a Jew and all ... That's why I'm involved and obsessed with and in all this .

Other people involved and obsessed with and in all this have different motivations.

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
71. why? this is hardly a first either
Sun Jun 22, 2014, 11:33 PM
Jun 2014

why make vile insinuations about other DUers and then refuse to back them up?

King_David

(14,851 posts)
74. I was talking about some DU posters in IP
Sun Jun 22, 2014, 11:40 PM
Jun 2014

About the BDS movement about Greta Berlin about some NGOs about the extremist right wingers in France and Europe about some in the Presbyterian church ... Not about DUrs....

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
85. Again, you make accussations about other DU members, when called on it you avoid and link
Mon Jun 23, 2014, 12:32 AM
Jun 2014

to something irrelevant.

Good to know you're consistent with support for Israeli policy and the Iran meme too.

King_David

(14,851 posts)
86. True I do support Israel .
Mon Jun 23, 2014, 12:35 AM
Jun 2014

What is Israel policy ?
Are you talking about government policy ?
Well if your talking about settlement expansion policy --- well no I don't support that at all.

Cheers!

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
87. No link to those you're accussing on DU? Policies are governmental, yes.
Mon Jun 23, 2014, 12:41 AM
Jun 2014

Do you feel Israel has expanded enough settlements? Or that they should never have done so to begin with?

The settlers should leave the West Bank, all of it?

King_David

(14,851 posts)
89. Yes I believe the settlements were a huge mistake
Mon Jun 23, 2014, 12:44 AM
Jun 2014

I believe eventually Israel will withdraw from the West Bank probably unilaterally in the end.
I don't believe Israel will withdraw from Jerusalem it's capital city ever.

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
91. They should leave all of the West Bank and East Jerusalem is the capital for the Palestinians.
Mon Jun 23, 2014, 12:51 AM
Jun 2014

Israel's current government will do nothing on their own, they proved that with Kerry.

King_David

(14,851 posts)
88. What kind of link do you want?
Mon Jun 23, 2014, 12:42 AM
Jun 2014

You want a link where Simone has compared the Jewish National project aka Zionism to white supremism for example?
I think I have linked to that ad nauseum.

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
90. I don't know, you are the one accussing DU members, here:
Mon Jun 23, 2014, 12:46 AM
Jun 2014

Star Member King_David (7,117 posts)
74. I was talking about some DU posters in IP

About the BDS movement about Greta Berlin about some NGOs about the extremist right wingers in France and Europe about some in the Presbyterian church ... Not about DUrs....

http://www.democraticunderground.com/113464551#post74

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
94. Ok, thanks for the link..he has his opinions. I appreciate it if someone is accussed, please
Mon Jun 23, 2014, 12:59 AM
Jun 2014

link it...people can then judge for themselves at that point.

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
93. ...
Mon Jun 23, 2014, 12:54 AM
Jun 2014

your title line states unequivocally you were speaking of DUers who post on I/P skip on to compare them to Greta Berlin and EU rightwingers ect and then deny the whole thing - fascinating

I was talking about some DU posters in IP

View profile
About the BDS movement about Greta Berlin about some NGOs about the extremist right wingers in France and Europe about some in the Presbyterian church ... Not about DUrs....

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1134&pid=64645

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
67. You edited your post after my reply. You see "we" and "us"? You use that language frequently.
Sun Jun 22, 2014, 11:19 PM
Jun 2014

You don't know who the other is, try and remember that.

When Viet Nam was being waged, the left complained and worked for it to end. The
left speaks out against many injustices, civil rights as well, to name two.

The United States is complicit in the occupation, you can't recognize that, too bad for you.

King_David

(14,851 posts)
68. You do not speak for the USA or "the left"
Sun Jun 22, 2014, 11:26 PM
Jun 2014

And certainly not for the Democratic Party of the USA .

You speak for yourself only.

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
69. The left did not protest Viet Nam, the left did not fight for civil rights??
Sun Jun 22, 2014, 11:31 PM
Jun 2014

Which history books did you read to bring you such a decrepit sense of facts? You're not entitled
to make up historical facts.

I know you tow the line of Israeli policy via the US policy...no worries.

King_David

(14,851 posts)
72. LOL
Sun Jun 22, 2014, 11:37 PM
Jun 2014

Now your speaking for me too ?

Vietnam Nam ?

Please tell me my views in the French Revolution or The fall of the Soviet Union or the independence of Taiwan while your about it ... LOL

As I said you speak for yourself only...

King_David

(14,851 posts)
76. Ok good so now we are getting somewhere
Sun Jun 22, 2014, 11:42 PM
Jun 2014

Best we talk for ourselves and you should let me speak for myself too instead of ascribing opinions to me ... About Vietnam Of all things .

Thanks for that...

Cheers

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
80. Still avoiding the conversation. You attempted to attribute a motive, an ulterior motive to people
Mon Jun 23, 2014, 12:16 AM
Jun 2014

who post in I/P when you edited your post after my reply..your post#60. About why you're legitimately involved
here and how you know..from some mysterious ability I presume, that you know other members ethnicity,
and imply there must be a less pure motive for posting here.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/113464551#post60

My reply is in #67: You edited your post after my reply. You see "we" and "us"? You use that language frequently.

You don't know who the other is, try and remember that.

When Viet Nam was being waged, the left complained and worked for it to end. The
left speaks out against many injustices, civil rights as well, to name two.

The United States is complicit in the occupation, you can't recognize that, too bad for you. ( end )

Then you proceeded to avoid my reasons why people, whoever they are, object to the occupation.
Your responses have been to tell me I don't speak for the left...blah blah blah. It's called historical
facts.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/113464551#post68

When I asked you to tell me that historically the left was not opposed to Viet Nam and did
in fact fight for civil rights..this was your answer..a non answer: http://www.democraticunderground.com/113464551#post72

All those non answers. You avoid and pretend you do not understand the language placed in front of you.






King_David

(14,851 posts)
83. I said Jews now know that because of Israel
Mon Jun 23, 2014, 12:25 AM
Jun 2014

Jews are now protected .
The rest of the world never took care of us, don't care what happens either .

Cambodia and Rwanda or Darfur the world doesn't care either , they too busy demonizing and trying to dismantle the Jewish state ( and the mighty Jewish State is the reason that never again is a reality for the Jewish people)

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
95. you are aware that Cambodia happened 1975-1979 right?
Mon Jun 23, 2014, 01:00 AM
Jun 2014

the only recent enough genocide to be applicable here was Darfur and if memory serves it was the favorite talking point of some here when deflecting criticism of Israel 'now you admit that really do not care about dead does that also go for Armenians, Greek Cypriots, Tibetans .........

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
96. I could be wrong, but I think he is saying, the world does not care about those countries deserving
Mon Jun 23, 2014, 01:23 AM
Jun 2014

attention, they would rather concentrate on destroying Israel.

King_David

(14,851 posts)
98. As I said it will never again happen to the Jewish
Mon Jun 23, 2014, 07:09 AM
Jun 2014

People because Israel is around.

Those other genocides have nothing to do with anything I am talking about and I'm not quite sure what you getting at there or what's your point?

 

R. Daneel Olivaw

(12,606 posts)
19. I'm calling you on you BS, king.
Sun Jun 22, 2014, 06:08 PM
Jun 2014

Being a belligerent occupying power isn't being strong. Showering the Palestinians with apartheid isn't being strong.

Great despots of the world have practiced what Israel is practicing on the Palestinians now. It did not make them as strong as they were just criminal.

But please dream on.

 

shira

(30,109 posts)
12. China's occupation of Tibet has been much longer than 50 years...
Sun Jun 22, 2014, 03:27 PM
Jun 2014

PCUSA isn't divesting from them, or calling for the destruction of China despite Chinese attempts to obliterate a 1400 year old Tibetan culture and killing over 1 million...

All decent people know the reason PCUSA singles out Israel, and it has nothing to do with peace.

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
13. PCUSA is divesting from Caterpillar, Hewlett-Packard, and Motorola.
Sun Jun 22, 2014, 03:40 PM
Jun 2014

which are American companies doing business with IDF's occupation forces in the West Bank-is PCUSA invested in American companies doing business with the Chinese military's occupation forces in Tibet?

 

shira

(30,109 posts)
14. PCUSA is singularly focused on Israel & no other nation....
Sun Jun 22, 2014, 03:50 PM
Jun 2014

They are against the very existence of Israel & do not advocate the destruction of any other.

Their position is simply indefensible.

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
15. once again is PCUSA invested in American companies doing business with China's military
Sun Jun 22, 2014, 03:56 PM
Jun 2014

forces in Tibet? That's the only way your example is applicable

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
38. I take it the answer about China is no, so about Turkey
Sun Jun 22, 2014, 07:51 PM
Jun 2014

you mean Incirlik American Airforce Base? Located in Turkey is that Cyprus or do you believe all of Turkey is illegally occupied by Turks? still really not applicable

 

shira

(30,109 posts)
33. Do you know any groups for BDS against Israel that target other countries for BDS?
Sun Jun 22, 2014, 07:12 PM
Jun 2014

Can you name one group?

I'm assuming you cannot, for obvious reasons.

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
40. well ya look at your own question but I remember the same questions being asked about South Africa
Sun Jun 22, 2014, 07:56 PM
Jun 2014

so don't feel bad.......

 

R. Daneel Olivaw

(12,606 posts)
55. Frankly I don't give a crap. This is I/P.
Sun Jun 22, 2014, 09:23 PM
Jun 2014

Try to keep up with the rest of the thread instead of spinning a yarn.

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
24. Fear of anti-semitism accusation did not stop Presbyterians from witnessing occupation
Sun Jun 22, 2014, 06:26 PM
Jun 2014


In the U.S. movement for justice in Palestine, the Presbyterian General Assembly vote Friday to divest is a major turning point. It represents the first time that a large mainstream U.S. church took a formal step to do what it’s able to do to end the Israeli Occupation. Perhaps even more important in assessing the impact of this event for the U.S. public, it reflects recognition by the rank-and-file church representatives — its General Assembly, comprised mostly of rank-and-file church members – that the conservative and militant Zionist U.S. opposition to the BDS movement relies only on name-calling and guilt-tripping, rather than fair and reasoned argument on the merits of their position.

Opponents of the divestment proposal wore t-shirts bearing the slogan: “Love us, don’t leave us!” The opposition arguments heard again and again at the plenary were threats that the adoption of the allegedly “anti-Semitic” proposal would anger and alienate the U.S. Jewish community from the Church. Not one argument was heard in defense of the merits of their position. Proponents of the proposal, in response, appealed to the Assembly to do justice, to have the courage to place their values above their fears of being accused of anti-Semitism. These appeals by proponents to the conscience of the voting rank-and-file Church membership were what carried the day.

The victory was for this reason far more significant than it appeared to be, as reported in mainstream media. It showed not only that rank-and-file Church members recognized the bankruptcy of the opposition, but that they also understood the facts on the ground and knew that these facts compelled Church divestment from the Occupation.

http://mondoweiss.net/2014/06/accusation-presbyterians-witnessing.html

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
29. Jewish groups would be wise to understand why the Presbyterians took this step...
Sun Jun 22, 2014, 06:42 PM
Jun 2014

instead of going back to the tired old Anti-Semitism accusations.

The Presbyterians have no desire to "dismantle" Israel. The do want to protest Israel's brutal and failed policies. Frankly, I wish they had gone further.

 

shira

(30,109 posts)
32. From Presbyterians for Middle East Peace: The True Agenda...End of Israel
Sun Jun 22, 2014, 07:07 PM
Jun 2014

Events this winter reveal that these advocates are anything but Israel’s friends. The Israel Palestinian Mission Network (IPMN) and Presbyterian Peace Fellowship (PPF) have broadened their attacks on Israel with explicit challenges to Israel’s existence as the Jewish (Zionist) state it was created to be in 1947. These challenges are unambiguously rampant in the so-called “congregational study guide” created by IPMN called “Zionism Unsettled.” The materials in “Zionism Unsettled” argue that Zionism (a Jewish state) is inherently discriminatory, and that the very idea of a homeland for the Jewish people is illegitimate. The guide states that “The fundamental assumption of this study is that no exceptionalist claims can be justified in our interconnected, pluralistic world.” In other words, no nation can build its identity around religion, ethnicity or other category. The Irish, Armenians, Japanese or Czech’s may have a problem with the IPMN-PPF vision of a world with no nations rooted in religious or ethnic identity.

The BDS advocates go so far as to criticize Jewish prayer books around the world for including a prayer for the state of Israel. Of course, the same activists also want to eliminate from the new PCUSA hymnal the traditional category of hymns entitled “The Covenant with Israel.” They say the language embraces the oppression they claim Israel inflicts on others. Will the next step be to challenge “covenant with Israel” language in the Bible?

At the 2014 General Assembly we will see an onslaught of anti-Israel initiatives:

Boycotts against Israeli products

Divestment from three companies doing business with Israel and with the Palestinian Authority

Labeling of Israel an apartheid nation

In addition, there will be criticism of the new hymnal for using the phrase “God’s Covenant with Israel” to describe a few hymns, and attempts to deflect criticism of the outrageous study guide the IPMN is distributing through our denominational publishing house. Add all of these strategies together and it is 100% clear that the true agenda of IPMN, PPF, and the secular BDS movement is to undo what the world did in 1947 when the international community came together to recognize the newly created Israel as a Jewish homeland.

http://www.pfmep.org/addressing-the-issues/139-the-true-agenda-the-end-of-the-jewish-state-of-israel

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
42. PCUSA is trying to destroy Israel by divesting from American companies? that's an original approach
Sun Jun 22, 2014, 08:06 PM
Jun 2014

the rest is an extremely hyperbolic tract from a competing group within the same denomination as PCUSA has not called for what they claim

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
46. This fact continues to be ignored:
Sun Jun 22, 2014, 08:18 PM
Jun 2014

*...noting that it targeted only American companies profiting from West Bank security systems, and successfully added amendments making the distinction clear. ( from BDS )

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
65. I've lost count of how many times I've seen any step taken to end the occupation of the West Bank
Sun Jun 22, 2014, 11:07 PM
Jun 2014

no matter how low key such as divesting from American companies doing business with Israel in the West Bank equated to destroying Israel by some here-giving at least the appearance that maintaining the occupation is integral to Israel's very existence

 

2banon

(7,321 posts)
39. I've been personally attempting to boycott Israeli food and other products/goods imported here..
Sun Jun 22, 2014, 07:55 PM
Jun 2014

It's like boycotting Koch products, really really hard. But it's the only personal power I have as an individual. not that it's much. I also have the power of my voice, and I let family members and friends be aware of the purchases they are making are enriching those that are causing suffering of others.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Israel/Palestine»Jewish groups anticipate ...