Where are the verified Aero Engineers who supported pilots for truth 11.2g failure.
http://www.cesura17.net/~will/ephemera/sept11/balsamo/balsamo2.html

Where are the verified Aero Engineers who supported pilots for truth fake Vg diagram.
http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=188863
https://www.metabunk.org/threads/easyjet-737-incident-debunks-pilot-for-9-11-truth-v-g-diagram-video.3160/page-7

Where are the verified Aero Engineers who supported pilots for truth lie of impossible speed.

RADAR and video debunk pilots for truth lie of impossible speed.

Does DU regularly allow such off-topic rhetoric that has already been discussed in other threads of this forum section?

Does this mean you support the claims made by William Seger under FAR part 25?

If so, just let us know. I will be happy to add your name under Seger's claims. After all, he has no one to support him at this point.

Pilots for truth have no verified Aero Engineers, if you did you would not make a errors as dumb as 11.2g, or fake a Vg diagram, or post a fake definition for Vd, or lie and say a 767 can't go 590 mph and crash into the WTC.


Simple logic, William can read and understand, while pilots for truth make up/quote mine fake definitions to mislead others, quote mining fake junk to support the impossible speed lie.

Reading comprehension beats all pilot for truth Aero Engineers who can't do math to come up with the correct g force for 77.

So... by you saying this -

"Simple logic, William can read and understand"

Are you stating that you are supporting the claims made by William Seger under FAR Part 25?

Yes or no....

... and since neither you nor any of the Hot Air Core had the nerve to go tell AlephZero where he went wrong, I won 50 imaginary bucks.


But I expect the score will need an update soon. I've sent some emails to some random aeronautical engineering professors, and the FAA. So have a little patience, Rob; we'll get to the bottom of this. Are you as excited as I am?

I came up with zero.

But hey, If you wish to learn from some anonymous person on the internet who admits he/she/it is an 'engine guy' while also claiming he/she/it cannot comment on aircraft designs... I suppose you are in good company. Apparently this girl feels the same way about the 'internets' as you....

Obviously the best "Aero Engineer" in Balsamo's corner is the Boeing PR lady/phone answerer with the BA in Journalism and a minor in political science from Western Washington University who claims, with Balsamo agreeing with her, that a 767 max speed at 700' is 250 miles per hour.

Who else you got in your corner, Cap't Bob? Ronald McDonald claiming it takes 11.2 gs to make a milk shake?

Face it. Your credibility sucks in the real world - in fact it is non-existant. You can't do anything but trot out the same old losers (Lankford? Kolstad? Latas? Idiots all) saying the same old tropes about the same old concoted BS that you have no proof of (fly overs?) while you flat out lie about "witness" statements at the Pentagon.

Please provide one of your "Aero Engineers" to talk about the max speed of a 767 at 700' i s250 miles per hour. While you are at it, point out on your little home-made diagram where that speed limitation falls.