Gun Control & RKBA
Related: About this forumHandgun sales are hot
The market shift toward handguns has been so pronounced that Colt is repurposing some of its manufacturing equipment and personnel that were dedicated to making semiautomatic rifles to make handguns instead.
Another indication that handgun sales are on the rise is the jump in the number of concealed carry permits, which apply only to handguns.
These permits jumped 30%, to 9 million, between 2010 and 2012, according to the most recent figures from the National Shooting Sports Foundation. They've likely increased since then, says NSSF spokesman Lawrence Keane, since Illinois passed a new law allowing permits for gun owners to carry concealed firearms.
http://money.cnn.com/2014/06/02/news/companies/handgun-sales/index.html?hpt=hp_t3
So much for the notion (fantasy?) that there are fewer gun owners.
Response to hack89 (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
HockeyMom
(14,337 posts)Florida has armed citizen "justifible homicdes", as in loud music at gas stations, standing in line at pizza places, walking around developments, etc., etc. Fear that if you get into an argument with a stranger in Florida, he is going to feel threatened and shoot you. You like living like that? I don't and that is why I don't want to be around "good guys" with guns in Florida.
I saw a man abusing a child in the supermarket. Some people were arguing with him. I told them, call 911, and don't argue with him. He might pull out a gun and shoot YOU.
No, I live in fear of you armed citizens. I did NOT in NYC.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)Florida's are also mostly gangs and drug dealers. The two murders and one self defense mentioned are very rare, which is why they were publicized. They were also highly politicized, which means you never get the truth in the media. As for the "walking through the neighborhood" I take it were weren't glued to Channel 20 with the rest of the state. If you had, you would know that it wasn't "walking though the neighborhood" To be perfectly honest, your fear is not that unfounded.
No, in NYC, you have to fear gangs and the police. Oh, and neighbors who ignore pleas for help while someone is getting stabbed to death.
Statistically, the police commit more crimes and kill more innocent people than CCW holders. Besides, gun ownership rate in Florida is about the same as New York's and France's
I'm guessing you won't be coming to Cheyenne Frontier Days?
HockeyMom
(14,337 posts)a man brought a gun into the hospital and shot his wife in her bed. I talked to the staff the week later and they said they did not what do to with the other patients, or if he would go on a shooping spree. Oh, maybe if THEY were armed they could have stopped this? ROFL Ever hear of that one? Nope, it didn't make NATIONAL news. Another? A man shot a salesman in the back as he was LEAVING the man's property. Another threatened to shoot a meter reader and CHILDREN on bikes for riding on the street in front of his property. Law abiding gun owners standing their ground because they were threatened!!!!
These are all in the same county of Florida I live in. Have you heard of these?????? I do. It makes the LOCAL Florida news. Again, these were all in just one Florida county. You will NEVER hear from the NRA about these.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)Why is that funny? It actually happens more often than criminal use. That is well known in criminology circles, and even noted in the latest CDC report that Obama ordered. In Belguim, three people were shot in a museum last week by an anti Semite with a pistol and a full auto AKM. Did it make it on DU? Anywhere in US media? How about the London kindergarten teacher who was cut down with a submachine gun while leaving her birthday party? Did Belgan or UK gun laws prevent either of those? No.
The latest rampage murder in Isla Vista, where three people were stabbed to death, three shot to death, and several shot and were run over made national news and has been politicized by the usual suspects. But that isn't the first mass murder in that town by an over privileged child of a Hollywood type. In 2001 one murdered 4 people. Remember seeing it on TV, or blogs? Me neither. Could it be that it was because killed all of them with a Saab instead of a Glock? I think so.
Mojorabbit
(16,020 posts)Seems like every neighborhood is tagged.
HockeyMom
(14,337 posts)What I really like about this survey is that they actually asked non-gun owners living in a GUN HOUSEHOLD what they thought. Far too many assume that all members in gun household think the same and are in favor of guns.
Apparently, the majority of us side more with the non-owners than our gun owning relatives. Maybe you need to really think about that one.
Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)I know quite a few women who barely tolerate their gun loving men. I'm not against gun ownership, but I must admit I am very leery of gun owners in general. Most are OK, but many are total weirdos, especially those who like to carry.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)HockeyMom
(14,337 posts)Look it up.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)30% is not a lot. And some of those former prosecutions weren't all justifiable.
Personally, I prefer Washington State's take on it. Here, we don't have castle doctrine, but it is a high bar to show someone defending their home wasn't justifiable. But. All such cases get reviewed by a grand jury, which is a critical advocacy position, when in the case of a justifiable homicide, only one side of the story is evident.
Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)upaloopa
(11,417 posts)One person one gun right?
hack89
(39,171 posts)I mean, how else could you interpret a spike in gun sales so large manufacturers have cut back on assault weapons?
You guys really live in a fantasy land, don't you? We are living in a golden age of gun rights and you keep talking like the tide has turned. Amazing.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)What the hell different does it make anyway?
Just more paranoid people
hack89
(39,171 posts)Or is it all those Dem politicians running in the 2014 election making gun control a front and center issue? A plethora of riches for controllers, right?
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)That means trying the best we can to keep guns away from people who would be prone to commit gun violence. It isn't an exact science. But I do think we can reduce it.
hack89
(39,171 posts)That is what the past 20 years tells us.
Yes, there are some common sense laws that would be very beneficial and most likely can be passed. But we have not had some watershed moment where all of sudden strict laws like AWBs or registration can be passed.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)talking point! Don't bother to reply if that is what you are going to post!
hack89
(39,171 posts)Really?
Uncomfortable facts but you do have address them, don' t you think?
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)All crime has reduced and not because of more guns!
Why you only get information from other gunners beats me. You have a fetish that keeps you from objective news!
hack89
(39,171 posts)All we can show is more guns did not lead to more deaths. I get my info from the FBI - hard numbers you need to consider.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)we use to get.
Why do you think that got blocked in Congress? Maybe because it won't back up your talking points!
hack89
(39,171 posts)Where do you think the CDC would get their data on gun violence from? What data would the CDC collect that the DOJ doesn't collect?
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)Make statements that I didn't make then dispute your own words. You don't need an adversary you are both you and your opponent.
hack89
(39,171 posts)Stop evading
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)stats. Stop describing my posts
hack89
(39,171 posts)Sounds reasonable.
hack89
(39,171 posts)2. Most indices of crime and gun violence are getting better, not worse. Overall crime rates have declined in the past decade, and violent crimes, including homicides specifically, have declined in the past 5 years, the report notes. Between 2005 and 2010, the percentage of firearm-related violent victimizations remained generally stable. Meanwhile, firearm-related death rates for youth ages 15 to 19 declined from 1994 to 2009. Accidents are down, too: Unintentional firearm-related deaths have steadily declined during the past century. The number of unintentional deaths due to firearm-related incidents accounted for less than 1 percent of all unintentional fatalities in 2010.
5. Mass shootings arent the problem. The number of public mass shootings of the type that occurred at Sandy Hook Elementary School accounted for a very small fraction of all firearm-related deaths, says the report. Since 1983 there have been 78 events in which 4 or more individuals were killed by a single perpetrator in 1 day in the United States, resulting in 547 victims and 476 injured persons. Compare that with the 335,000 gun deaths between 2000 and 2010 alone.
7. Guns are used for self-defense often and effectively. Almost all national survey estimates indicate that defensive gun uses by victims are at least as common as offensive uses by criminals, with estimates of annual uses ranging from about 500,000 to more than 3 million per year in the context of about 300,000 violent crimes involving firearms in 2008, says the report. The three million figure is probably high, based on an extrapolation from a small number of responses taken from more than 19 national surveys. But a much lower estimate of 108,000 also seems fishy, because respondents were not asked specifically about defensive gun use. Furthermore, Studies that directly assessed the effect of actual defensive uses of guns (i.e., incidents in which a gun was 'used' by the crime victim in the sense of attacking or threatening an offender) have found consistently lower injury rates among gun-using crime victims compared with victims who used other self-protective strategies.
http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/human_nature/2013/06/handguns_suicides_mass_shootings_deaths_and_self_defense_findings_from_a.html
oneshooter
(8,614 posts)" Stop describing my posts"
blueridge3210
(1,401 posts)gejohnston
(17,502 posts)just like the DoJ does. What they are blocked from doing is lobbying and advocacy for gun control.
blueridge3210
(1,401 posts)More! I'm sure you're bringing him around to your point of view! Really!
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)his is a one sided conversation. Everything he posts i've read here for a year and a half.
blueridge3210
(1,401 posts)You're the one who doesn't appear to want to listen, as you're attempting to dictate what another person should post.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)over what other people post
blueridge3210
(1,401 posts)This, after you were shouting that you didn't need to be educated.
Stop trying to educate me ok?
I don't need it!
Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)Yep, it's a good time for guns and gun peddlers. Pity the poor suckers who feel the need to buy handguns. But you keep on kidding yourselves and you think the rest of us live in "fantasy land"
Guns don't have rights and those who peddle them with their fearmongering propaganda have no concept of the public's right to be safe. Of course that's not an enumerated right, is it? Enjoy your celebration of the pursuit of gun happiness.
Most CC permits are bought by existing gun owners and I seriously doubt that many who get CCW permits are stupid enough to carry on a regular basis. But you can fantasize about not being the only one in the room if it makes you feel better.
hack89
(39,171 posts)I have a CCW permit I keep out of principle but I have no need for self defense weapons at home or in public.
Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)Nothing wrong with having a permit, just in case. I'm sure most other permit holders do the same.
hack89
(39,171 posts)Some people need to carry. There was a short time in my live when I had to carry. It is all about choice.
Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)I always try to remember that those choices are mine, and mine only. It doesn't mean they are right or wrong, they are what they are and I neither encourage, nor discourage others to make similar choices. I only encourage them to think very carefully about their options and weigh them against potential consequences.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)But I certainly don't carry all the time. It's hugely inconvenient.
I carry when I feel appropriate. Such as moonlight runs on a forest trail. Deep hikes into the woods, etc. I rarely carry in the city.
(And I never open carry.)
Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)bowens43
(16,064 posts)the whole 'for self-defense' meme is a lie perpetrated by the death merchants and their followers.
mwrguy
(3,245 posts)millions of them.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)It was proven in court beyond any doubt that it was self defense. Hard to beat two eye witnesses and forensics.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)hack89
(39,171 posts)and should be treated as such.
Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)That's why schools have sex education classes and cops have breathalyzers.
hack89
(39,171 posts)I can agree to that.
Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)Children should not be sheltered from the assholery of adults.
My school had a rifle range, an armory, an archery club and a fencing team. I know of no negative incidents or injuries.
hack89
(39,171 posts)I know what kills teens in my town and it is not guns.
Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)Your town may not have kids being killed by guns, but the fact is that kids are killed every day by guns all over America.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)with a car, but by a gun? Your sentence implies that guns are a take on the movie Christine. Not very rational isn't it?
Read the stories about the guy in California. They are written the same way, stabbed with a knife others shot by a gun? Besides being incorrect word usage, it is also propaganda. Things like substituting "following" for "stalking" to get a stronger emotional response from the intended audience. Of course, the military "neutralizing the target" instead of "kill" lessens he emotional impact.
In the 2001 mass murder in Isla Vista, did David Attias murder four people, or did his car? I have yet to read an article that says they were killed by the car, the focus was on the driver. When it comes to shootings, the focus is on the weapon, and only the weapon, instead of the operator. Doesn't seem logical does it?
As Jonathan Turley put it:
Be aware of the meaning and choice of words. To that end, work to strengthen your vocabulary. Buy a Word A Day calender or download an app for your phone, use a website or download a tickler program for your computer.
Always question the message and the messenger as well as any who may have sent the messenger. Practice reading with emotional detachment and a critical eye to not only what is said, but how it is said and by whom.
Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)and fireworks and electrical outlets.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)watched a 16mm film about what if you find blasting caps. That has what to do with propaganda?
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)They put you in a machine that holds a car in the air, and rolls it 360 degrees. So you can feel how the belt restrains you.
More effective than a fine.
Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)I wasn't aware of that one. I'm a big believer in "Scared Straight" programs.
HockeyMom
(14,337 posts)I guess not. Can adults opt out too? EVERYONE in the USA must know how to handle a gun????
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)Eddie Eagle is the NRA's "don't touch it, it's not a toy." Of course, as every creative writer will tell you, showing is better than telling. Besides, do kids always believe everything you tell them. When I was a kid, none of our guns were loaded in the house (we never locked the doors at night either, nice thing about Wyoming) except for one, my brother's off duty revolver (he unloaded his duty .357 when he got home.) That meant my mom and sister in law mandated a new gun safety demonstration for his four year old step daughter's benefit (I was eight, I already had my own gun). No, he didn't use the small .38, he used the more powerful revolver. It amounted to, "hear how loud it is? See what it did to that carton of milk? Don't touch it."
Now if we are talking about a school rifle club or shooting team, yeah then you have more in-depth class, which would be opt in.
Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)Instruction on gun safety for kids is not about learning how to shoot a gun. It is about what a child should do when he/she encounters one. Like do not touch it and distance yourself from it. Report it to law enforcement, keep smaller children from touching it etc..
Teaching kids to use guns is for parents to decide, not schools.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)or the police or game warden
Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)If parents want to, I think it is their right and it is also their responsibility and if the kid fucks up they should be held responsible.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)If a 17 year old is still a kid (although child has been used), 17 year olds can enlist.
At the time the draft notice was sent, voting age was 21, could not drink in some states. But then if he were a DC resident, he could not vote at all regardless of his race.
Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)What does it have to do with school programs on gun safety?
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)in my 7th grade health class. Long before then, I learned that shooting the heroine was murder.
warrant46
(2,205 posts)Its a cultural thing. And also permitted, licensed and encouraged in my state.
We all eventually join the military. Every war since WW I ------ 5 during Viet-Nam 3 in the service right now
To a person we all win marksmanship competition in basic training because of our familiarity with expert shooting.
Its a violent world and someone needs to be willing and prepared to volunteer to defend it.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Say that again without the sarcasm. You just had a really good point.
I would absolutely show a student the interior of actual social mechanisms. Jails. Morgues. You bet.
These are human, social things. No need for sarcasm. That's a stand-up idea. I wouldn't call it 'assholery'.
Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)I consider the promoting of routine indiscriminate carrying of firearms to be assholery. As opposed to carrying for genuine reasons, like really feeling unsafe because of prior threats or harassment.
I also consider leaving guns around kids to be assholery. Kids need to be taught how to deal with such situations.
No sarcasm intended.
sarisataka
(18,551 posts)Execute them all... it is the only way to save the women and children
DEATH TO THE DEATH MERCHANTS AND THEIR FOLLOWERS
if we had a ridicule smiley you would find it
:here:
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)that a DU person says nobody here says things like this. What utter crap.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)oneshooter
(8,614 posts)" If you have a penis, you are a potential rapist"
"If you own a gun, you are a potential murderer"
"If you own a fork, you are a potential fat person"
Actually I made up the last one, but you can never tell.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)I do in fact own many tactical assault forks, and I am fat.
Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)Unbelievable.
hack89
(39,171 posts)friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)...their fears onto those groups and believe they also live in fear.
Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)What groups are we talking about?
Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)I have a healthy level of fear, that helps me survive the environment I live in. Most of my fear stems from myself and my ability to deal with danger and situations at sea, where I'm often responsible for the lives of others.
hack89
(39,171 posts)Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)I have no fear of guns, period, whether legally or illegally owned. I am wary, not fearful, of anyone carrying a gun, regardless of who that person is. I learned at an early age to respect firearms and understand their potential to kill.
samsingh
(17,594 posts)ownership
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)a bit of a strawman. As far as guns saving lives, more accurate to say that people do save their lives and physical health with guns. Not even the CDC disputes that.
hack89
(39,171 posts)Read Heller -even Scalia says so.
Time to retire that strawman.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)limits on firearms. Guns have been able to save some lives also, sometimes without even having to pull a trigger. Does that make the news, probably not. But a madman that kills three people with a knife, kills two by shooting them and also tries to kill people with his car. Of course that makes the news and only the gun deaths are highlighted.
ileus
(15,396 posts)I've been wanting a new home defense / range plinker.
I looked over the M&P COREs and G34, but I'm thinking this monster sized "duty" pistol from CZ may fit the bill.
Right now I have a p220 on the stand at night, but with a limit of 9 I'm feeling somewhat low on ammo. This 09 gives my 20 rounds on tap for family safety, and 20 rounds at the range for fun and games with the family.
Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)I'm sure your family will feel even safer when you invest more dollars in your arsenal.