It certainly isn't the American public.

while the other 75% are opposed to a firearm ban, so, that would make you the minority.

Hillary seems to be pulling a Fiorina: Tell the most outrageous tale about the enemy, get a boost in the polls.

Fiorina really let a mud-splattering hippo fart of a story about Planned Parenthood, and the crowd went wild: Got a boost in polls.

Hillary wants Uique status established for gun companies so they can be ued beyind normal product liability statutes, but calls the present staus an exemption only for guns. At least her Bar-ROOM! at the watering hole has the grace of upside down, 180° symmetry, but this muddy surface burst will be applauded by some: Boost in polls? Wait and see.

To controller/banners: Before this law was passed, there were several special exemption suits filed against manufacturers. Do you know the results of these suits?

Ten thousand Indians are descending on the Lone Ranger and Tonto, the Lone Ranger looks at Tonto and says "Tonto, we need to get to those rocks and shoot it out with those Indians and save our lives", Tonto looks at the Lone Ranger and says, "Where do you get this we shit white man?"

Then we sue onieda if they made the knives. Maybe the gas station that sold him gas to get there. . .

and doorknobs...without doorknobs the killer would never have been able to exit the house.

Our gun control minded friends have a situational ethics problem, plus they are short sighted to a fault.

No problem for them using a back door approach to closing down gun manufacturers with lawsuits.

But if the same thing was tried as a back door way to shut down surgical instrument manufacturers for women's health issues, they'd scream like crazy about how horrible and unconstitutional it was.

We've lost the House and Senate and how many state legislatures and Governors? Maybe when President Liz Cheney is in the Oval Office for her second term they'll start to figure out their pet issue is a loser.

Cutting death and violence is a very good cause. Both the red and the blue teams are in favor. It's how to do that where they differ. Maybe I'm wrong but some aspects of this just seem to me to be something that one of the teams adopts as a position simply because the other team is against it.

she damn well knows that she can't repeal it, only the Congress can.
What do you think the chances of that are?

Bernie's his own man, unlike Hillary and her puppet masters.

Why are you insulting Bernie here?

What insult to Bernie?
Please do tell.

just stop with the lies.

I would have thought several timeouts would have done something.

I feel sorry for him myself

I fully expect for this to be alerted on.


Jury, please keep in mind this poster has been put on vacation several times over some of his posts that were determined to be over the top. That process should change behavior.

Being an alleged calculus teacher, he sure doesn't seem very knowledgeable.

Just a matter of time

He tend to listen to the experts, unlike others.

Give it a couple of months or less

Government studies are banned, what that is not true?

... Even if the CDC and any other alphabet soup agency actually had "gun studies" banned.

What stops the Billionaire banker Bloomberg and his ilk from paying for any study (and results) he wants? I know for a fact that ORC accepts checks and POs, I've written several myself to them over the years.

Doesn't Hemenway or the other hired guns need a summer house somewhere?

I mean, what stops the gun controllers from funding studies?

For that matter, I keep hearing from the control side that the NRA pays for Congress loyalty. If that's true, does that mean that gun controllers, even with Bloomberg's and the Joyce Foundation's billions of $$$ behind them, are just too cheap or stupid to buy their own congress critters or outbid the NRA?

I cant think of a reason, well, other than they seem to be both too lazy to get off the couch and do anything or go anywhere to protest and too cheap to join any group or donate in the real world?