Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,393 posts)
Tue Jan 22, 2019, 02:37 PM Jan 2019

Wild NFL rule allows Roger Goodell to reverse Rams-Saints outcome, but would he actually use it?

Wild NFL rule allows Roger Goodell to reverse Rams-Saints outcome, but would he actually use it?
The NFL commissioner has the power to reverse the outcome of a football game
Will Brinson @WillBrinson 2h ago • 3 min read

After all the insanity of Championship Sunday wrapped, it was almost hard to comprehend all the crazy things that happened throughout the day. One thing stood above all else though: the Rams pass interference penalty against the Saints that went uncalled by the referees and ultimately allowed the Rams to advance to their first Super Bowl since 2001.

Lingering with that game and the outcome is the NFL's lack of a statement about the lack of a penalty. And lingering over that is a pretty insane and broad rule in the NFL rulebook that would allow NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell, should he so choose, to reverse or reschedule the outcome of the game between the Saints and Rams.

No, really. Goodell could either tell the Rams "sorry" and send the Saints to the Super Bowl or he could make them play the NFC Championship Game again. Either situation falls deep in the realm of the unlikely, but Rule 17, Section 2, Article 1, as noted by Pro Football Talk's Mike Florio, does exist.

And it reads like this:

"The Commissioner has the sole authority to investigate and take appropriate disciplinary and/or corrective measures if any club action, non-participant interference, or calamity occurs in an NFL game which the Commissioner deems so extraordinarily unfair or outside the accepted tactics encountered in professional football that such action has a major effect on the result of the game."
....
17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Wild NFL rule allows Roger Goodell to reverse Rams-Saints outcome, but would he actually use it? (Original Post) mahatmakanejeeves Jan 2019 OP
Very unlikely duforsure Jan 2019 #1
My son had heard this discussed on a sports call-in show SCantiGOP Jan 2019 #7
The Chiefs have as good a claim as the Saints. Ponietz Jan 2019 #2
The phantom roughing the passer happened with 7+ hughee99 Jan 2019 #12
There was a missed facemask on Goff the possession before that JonLP24 Jan 2019 #14
I agree. There were a number of bad/missed calls, including the pick play on the chiefs touchdown. hughee99 Jan 2019 #15
I made no argument about the Chiefs game JonLP24 Jan 2019 #16
The post I was originally responding to was suggesting hughee99 Jan 2019 #17
I Didn't Watch The Game But I Saw The Clip Of The Pass Interference..... global1 Jan 2019 #3
You can't review a pass interference call, it's on the list of non-reviewable calls. LisaM Jan 2019 #4
Does That Mean The Saints Couldn't Have Challenged The Call As Well?....nt global1 Jan 2019 #9
Correct (though it was also under 2 minutes, and you can't challenge under 2 minutes). LisaM Jan 2019 #10
Won't happen, ever. Many errors in calls that effected the Rams too... beachbum bob Jan 2019 #5
Saints fans have started a petition on Change.org... Different Drummer Jan 2019 #6
Appears we are seeing a Wellstone ruled Jan 2019 #8
If he didn't use it to reverse the 2009 Bountygate NFCC game, then he won't for this. trotsky Jan 2019 #11
this would create a nightmare for sports books. Mosby Jan 2019 #13

duforsure

(11,885 posts)
1. Very unlikely
Tue Jan 22, 2019, 02:40 PM
Jan 2019

But New Orleans was hurt by the calls made, and New Orleans fate was possibly determined by their mistake.

SCantiGOP

(13,869 posts)
7. My son had heard this discussed on a sports call-in show
Tue Jan 22, 2019, 03:09 PM
Jan 2019

They said this rule was not for disputed referee calls, but was meant to cover something completely out of the ordinary, like if evidence were found after the game that someone was attempting to shave points or throw the game, or an obviously non-eligible player was used in a game, etc etc

Ponietz

(2,961 posts)
2. The Chiefs have as good a claim as the Saints.
Tue Jan 22, 2019, 02:48 PM
Jan 2019

The phantom roughing the passer penalty ultimately gave NE the game. Goodall can just announce a Saints-Chiefs Super Bowl.

The NFL was already a clusterfuck of ads peppered with a little football before this fiasco.

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
12. The phantom roughing the passer happened with 7+
Tue Jan 22, 2019, 04:34 PM
Jan 2019

Minutes to go, happened on an incomplete pass on 2nd down, and after it happened, the chiefs actually had a lead that they couldn’t hold. Yes, no doubt it was a terrible call, but if you think it’s the same thing as what happened to the Saints, you don’t really understand what the issue is.

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
14. There was a missed facemask on Goff the possession before that
Wed Jan 23, 2019, 11:01 PM
Jan 2019

Would have made it 1st & goal at the 1. Rams also probably should have went for it on 4th and goal idled they scored a touchdown New Orleans would be playing for more than 3 points.

I think the fact Congress is taking the issue up and they are even considering replaying the game is a little ridiculous.

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
15. I agree. There were a number of bad/missed calls, including the pick play on the chiefs touchdown.
Thu Jan 24, 2019, 02:03 AM
Jan 2019

In the end, though, if you're comparing the bad roughing the passer call to the non-call of pass interference about it's clear impact on the outcome of the game, it's ridiculous.

There is no way, ZERO chance, that they will replay the game. It would open Pandora's box.

The ONLY way I could ever see a game being replayed is if there is proof that the refs intentionally fixed the game, and even then, it would have to be determined almost immediately after the game was played, or there wouldn't be time to do it anyway. That information would also have to go public. I think even if the NFL league officials knew a game was fixed by the refs after the fact, and only they knew, they'd keep it quiet as long as they possibly could, hope it would never go public, and play dumb.

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
16. I made no argument about the Chiefs game
Thu Jan 24, 2019, 03:53 AM
Jan 2019

I do think it was a bad roughing call that may have improved the odds in the Patriots favor like the extra 15 yards and a first down rather than 2nd or 3rd & 10.

I think the neutral zone infraction on the interception cost them the game plus 3 3rd & 7s in overtime all they had to do was hold them to a field goal attempt.

I think they should probably fix replay rules in the off-season but that would impact all plays not just the memorable late game missed calls.

I think there was (by the rule book) defensive holding or pass interference late in the Baltimore & San Francisco Super Bowl but don't remember Auggie (this is a joke) or 49ers fans filing lawsuits.

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
17. The post I was originally responding to was suggesting
Thu Jan 24, 2019, 08:58 AM
Jan 2019

That the chiefs were equally justified as the saints in wanting a redo because of the refs. When you pointed out other missed calls in the rams game, I added this missed call in the pats game (again, one of many) to say that even though both games had bad or missed calls, the impact of the refs on the Rams outcome is much easier to show than the impact on the pats game.

I agree on the offsides killing the chiefs. At the very least, that one isn’t on the refs, though.

This isn’t the first time I’ve heard fans wanting a replay, but this is the first I’ve heard of that rule to suggest that it’s a possibility.

There’s no way they don’t do something about replay in the offseason, even if it’s a cosmetic or ineffective fix. They will at least try to appear like they’re doing something.

global1

(25,241 posts)
3. I Didn't Watch The Game But I Saw The Clip Of The Pass Interference.....
Tue Jan 22, 2019, 02:49 PM
Jan 2019

and helmet to helmet contact. Both clearly should have been called.

My questions is - why wasn't this play reviewed by the officials? And why didn't the Saints challenge the call?

LisaM

(27,802 posts)
4. You can't review a pass interference call, it's on the list of non-reviewable calls.
Tue Jan 22, 2019, 02:51 PM
Jan 2019

That may change after this season (though it would slow down the game immeasurably).

LisaM

(27,802 posts)
10. Correct (though it was also under 2 minutes, and you can't challenge under 2 minutes).
Tue Jan 22, 2019, 03:50 PM
Jan 2019

So there was nothing the Saints could have done.

I don't think the call should have been missed. In real time, you can see the receiver go flying in the air! That doesn't happen with incidental contact, or when the defender is going for the ball.

Different Drummer

(7,613 posts)
6. Saints fans have started a petition on Change.org...
Tue Jan 22, 2019, 03:02 PM
Jan 2019

to replay the NFC Championship game this coming Sunday. Currently, the petition has over 500K signatures on it. The organizer apparently will submit the petition to the Commissioner's office if they get 1 million or more signatures. But if they, by some chance, *do* replay the game, who's to say the Rams wouldn't win the replay?

 

Wellstone ruled

(34,661 posts)
8. Appears we are seeing a
Tue Jan 22, 2019, 03:10 PM
Jan 2019

sad trend. After watching this NFL season,it seems every game had a missed call or really bad call,that has been a game changer.

As someone who did High School Officiating,have to say,you just hope you did not make a call or miss a call that causes the out come of any game.



trotsky

(49,533 posts)
11. If he didn't use it to reverse the 2009 Bountygate NFCC game, then he won't for this.
Tue Jan 22, 2019, 04:22 PM
Jan 2019

Sometimes you get the benefit of a bad (non-)call. Sometimes you're on the wrong end. Tough.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Sports»Wild NFL rule allows Roge...