Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
Related: About this forumU.S. Supreme Court will not intervene in fight over California cross
Source: Reuters
U.S. Supreme Court will not intervene in fight over California cross
BY SHARON BERNSTEIN
Mon Jun 30, 2014 1:06pm EDT
(Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court has for the second time declined to take up the question of whether the cross atop a San Diego war memorial constitutes an illegal endorsement of religion by the federal government.
In an unusual statement Monday supporting the decision not to hear the case, Justice Samuel Alito said that because a lower court's order to remove the massive cross atop a war memorial overlooking the city had been stayed pending appeal, there was no need for the high court to step in at this time.
"The district court has issued an order requiring the memorial to be removed, but it has stayed that order pending appeal," Alito wrote. "The court of appeals has not yet reviewed that order."
The 43-foot structure has been the subject of litigation since 1989, when two veterans sued San Diego to get it off city land.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
BY SHARON BERNSTEIN
Mon Jun 30, 2014 1:06pm EDT
(Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court has for the second time declined to take up the question of whether the cross atop a San Diego war memorial constitutes an illegal endorsement of religion by the federal government.
In an unusual statement Monday supporting the decision not to hear the case, Justice Samuel Alito said that because a lower court's order to remove the massive cross atop a war memorial overlooking the city had been stayed pending appeal, there was no need for the high court to step in at this time.
"The district court has issued an order requiring the memorial to be removed, but it has stayed that order pending appeal," Alito wrote. "The court of appeals has not yet reviewed that order."
The 43-foot structure has been the subject of litigation since 1989, when two veterans sued San Diego to get it off city land.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/06/30/us-usa-california-cross-idUSKBN0F51ZB20140630
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 779 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
U.S. Supreme Court will not intervene in fight over California cross (Original Post)
Eugene
Jun 2014
OP
cbayer
(146,218 posts)1. Sounds like their refusal is just
a technicality. They are waiting until the appeals court rules.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)3. Go grief. They have been fighting this since 1989?
cbayer
(146,218 posts)4. Unbelievable, isn't it.
I can't even imagine what those on both sides have spent on legal fees.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)2. "at this time". n/t
okasha
(11,573 posts)5. SCOTUS is the court of last resort.
Legal procedure requires other avenues of appeal to be exhausted before SCOTUS will hear a case.