Religion
Related: About this forumProgressives embrace religious liberty for their own causes
An illegal homeless encampment on a sidewalk in Honolulu. Photo courtesy of St. Elizabeth's Episcopal Church in Honolulu
By G. Jeffrey MacDonald | 9 hours ago
(RNS) Religious liberty has often been a thorn in the side of progressives, especially when its used by conservatives to defend everything from Christians-only clubs on campus to merchants who wont serve gays.
But progressives are now leveraging the First Amendment principle as a vehicle to advance causes of their own. As they see it, social action is integral to living out their faith, and local ordinances cant take away their rights.
In the name of religious freedom, activists are defying local resistance to their campaigns for social change. Theyre pressing ahead, for instance, with plans to install solar panels over a local boards objections in Massachusetts and to establish tent cities for the homeless in California and Michigan.
Their inspiration comes in part from the state of Washington, where 15 Seattle-area congregations have hosted tent cities on grounds that theyre following a religious imperative.
http://religionnews.com/2016/08/26/progressives-embrace-religious-liberty-for-their-own-causes/
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)Faith is not just for the right wing. Well, actually I believe that but I cannot prove it.
Igel
(35,274 posts)"That's wrong, keep religion out of politics. It's evil. Immoral. Can't be allowed."
"Oh, wait. In *this* case I want what religion encourages. No, no. It's wonderful. It's great. We need the *right* religion, *our* religion, in politics. It's good. It's moral. It's required."
What's different is the usual "we're good, they're bad. We're smart, they're stupid. We're moral, they're immoral." And the less you know them personally, the starker the contrast between the carriers of light and virtue and the dirty subhuman pig Neandertals who try to dehumanize others.
Hypocrisy used to be a sin. Now it's a virtue.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)And they should be separated.
nomorenomore08
(13,324 posts)and using it to improve lives?
P.S. I know how important church/state separation is. But that doesn't mean religious folks can't be political activists as well - it's the positions they advocate that matter, not their faith or lack thereof per se.
struggle4progress
(118,224 posts)The solar-panel case looks to me like an arrack on historical-district zoning laws
And there may be good reasons, including public health and public safety, for local governments to want to discourage tent-cities
edhopper
(33,479 posts)legitimizing the idea of "religious liberty" is a mistake that will bite progressives on the ass.
struggle4progress
(118,224 posts)it shouldn't be used indiscriminately