Unless they're same-sex couples trying to get married or adopt. Then Blank Frank will oppose them and condemn them at every opportunity. Unless they're victims of priest rape and Vatican cover-up. Then he'll hand them more stonewalling. Unless they're women trying to exercise reproductive rights as a way to help fight poverty. Then he'll fight with all the resources of his organization to keep contraception out of their hands.

And how does Zuckerberg like his "message" that homosexuals are "inherently disordered"?

Lipstick on a pig.

Did I get it all, scottie?

The humane side of him, only.

Rather exactly in the vein that Rug himself once called for, Zuckerman is here a humane atheist. An atheist concerned with helping humanity in a moral, ethical way.

Obviously, being an atheist (or secular Jew?), Z is not embracing the ENTIRE Catholic program.

Do go on.

Today, outweighs any good it does, on balance.

I glanced at his now-deleted goodby OP. However, I'd encourage him to hang around. His point of view will now and then be needed.

He has always been ready to step into the breach, the gap, in every battle. To fight the good fight for science and atheism.

I sincerely thank and salute Mr. Blur, for invaluable service to his country.

that I'm sure you'd like to put in my mouth. Which is all you have, since you can't dispute or even "discuss" the truth of any of it.

Btw, stirring tribute to you here the other day. Seems to be quite popular. Any thoughts?

It's too bad he's not here. He added as much to this board as you do.

anywhere in my post, feel free to point to it.

Oh...right..you can't. It's just shit you made up and tried to pretend I said. Your usual.

"Actually, I removed the words from your mouth."

By golly, I don't see enable in there.