Science
Related: About this forumUncedrtain uncertaintly
Werner Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, formulated by the theoretical physicist in 1927, is one of the cornerstones of quantum mechanics. In its most familiar form, it says that it is impossible to measure anything without disturbing it. For instance, any attempt to measure a particle's position must randomly change its speed.
The principle has bedeviled quantum physicists for nearly a century, until recently, when researchers at the University of Toronto demonstrated the ability to directly measure the disturbance and confirm that Heisenberg was too pessimistic.
"We designed an apparatus to measure a property -- the polarization -- of a single photon. We then needed to measure how much that apparatus disturbed that photon," says Lee Rozema, a Ph.D. candidate in Professor Aephraim Steinberg's quantum optics research group at U of T, and lead author of a study published this week in Physical Review Letters.
"To do this, we would need to measure the photon before the apparatus but that measurement would also disturb the photon," Rozema says.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/09/120907125154.htm
truedelphi
(32,324 posts)"To do this, we would need to measure the photon before the appratus but that measurement would also disturb the photon."
Damn it ALL!
I hate when that happens.
bananas
(27,509 posts)Synopsis: The Certainty of Uncertainty
L. A. Rozema et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. (2012)
Violation of Heisenbergs Measurement-Disturbance Relationship by Weak Measurements
Lee A. Rozema, Ardavan Darabi, Dylan H. Mahler, Alex Hayat, Yasaman Soudagar, and Aephraim M. Steinberg
Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 100404 (2012)
Published September 6, 2012
When first taking quantum mechanics courses, students learn about Heisenbergs uncertainty principle, which is often presented as a statement about the intrinsic uncertainty that a quantum system must possess. Yet Heisenberg originally formulated his principle in terms of the observer effect: a relationship between the precision of a measurement and the disturbance it creates, as when a photon measures an electrons position. Although the former version is rigorously proven, the latter is less general andas recently shownmathematically incorrect. In a paper in Physical Review Letters, Lee Rozema and colleagues at the University of Toronto, Canada, experimentally demonstrate that a measurement can in fact violate Heisenbergs original precision-disturbance relationship.
If the observer affects the observed, how can one even make such a measurement of the disturbance of a measurement? Rozema et al. use a procedure called weak quantum measurement: if one can probe a quantum system by means of a vanishingly small interaction, information about the initial state can be squeezed out with little or no disturbance. The authors use this approach to characterize the precision and disturbance of a measurement of the polarizations of entangled photons. By comparing the initial and final states, they find that the disturbance induced by the measurement is less than Heisenbergs precision-disturbance relation would require.
While the measurements by Rozema et al. leave untouched Heisenbergs principle regarding inherent quantum uncertainty, they expose the pitfalls of its application to measurements precision. These results not only provide a demonstration of the degree of precision achievable in weak-measurement techniques, but they also help explore the very foundations of quantum mechanics. David Voss
Violation of Heisenberg's Measurement-Disturbance Relationship by Weak Measurements
Lee A. Rozema, Ardavan Darabi, Dylan H. Mahler, Alex Hayat, Yasaman Soudagar, Aephraim M. Steinberg
(Submitted on 31 Jul 2012 (v1), last revised 15 Aug 2012 (this version, v2))
While there is a rigorously proven relationship about uncertainties intrinsic to any quantum system, often referred to as "Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle," Heisenberg originally formulated his ideas in terms of a relationship between the precision of a measurement and the disturbance it must create. Although this latter relationship is not rigorously proven, it is commonly believed (and taught) as an aspect of the broader uncertainty principle. Here, we experimentally observe a violation of Heisenberg's "measurement-disturbance relationship", using weak measurements to characterize a quantum system before and after it interacts with a measurement apparatus. Our experiment implements a 2010 proposal of Lund and Wiseman to confirm a revised measurement-disturbance relationship derived by Ozawa in 2003. Its results have broad implications for the foundations of quantum mechanics and for practical issues in quantum mechanics.