Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
Tue Jun 24, 2014, 08:16 PM Jun 2014

Titan May be Older than Saturn, a New Study Suggests

It’s well accepted that moons form after planets. In fact, only a few months ago, astronomers spotted a new moon forming deep within Saturn’s rings, 4.5 billion years after the planet initially formed.

But new research suggests Saturn’s icy moon Titan — famous for its rivers and lakes of liquid methane — may have formed before its parent planet, contradicting the theory that Titan formed within the warm disk surrounding an infant Saturn.

A combined NASA and ESA-funded study has found firm evidence that the nitrogen in Titan’s atmosphere originated in conditions similar to the cold birthplace of the most ancient comets from the Oort cloud — a spherical shell of icy particles that enshrouds the Solar System.

The hint comes in the form of a ratio. All elements have a certain number of known isotopes — variants of that element with the same number of protons that differ in their number of neutrons. The ratio of one isotope to another isotope is a crucial diagnostic tool.


Read more: http://www.universetoday.com/112789/titan-may-be-older-than-saturn-a-new-study-suggests/#ixzz35bb2kRfK

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Titan May be Older than Saturn, a New Study Suggests (Original Post) n2doc Jun 2014 OP
note to self: send the GOP there SummerSnow Jun 2014 #1
Well, it could be McCain's homeland! n/t n2doc Jun 2014 #3
Awesome. Science is both Humbling and Inspiring to me... Anansi1171 Jun 2014 #2
yeah, humble is not their thing. mopinko Jun 2014 #5
"It’s well accepted that moons form after planets." Bonobo Jun 2014 #4
agreed mopinko Jun 2014 #6

Anansi1171

(793 posts)
2. Awesome. Science is both Humbling and Inspiring to me...
Tue Jun 24, 2014, 08:33 PM
Jun 2014

...perhaps thats what most troubles the christian right.

Bonobo

(29,257 posts)
4. "It’s well accepted that moons form after planets."
Tue Jun 24, 2014, 10:21 PM
Jun 2014

I would question the veracity of that statement.

There seems (to me) no reason to assume that. A wandering (rogue) clump that is a "planet" or "moon" (defined after the fact) could be captured in any number of potential orbits at any point after it is formed. Or so it seems to me.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»Titan May be Older than S...