Asian Group
Related: About this forumChinese Boycott May Be More Costly For Japan Than The Tsunami
Writing on the shirt: Japan Pig
Sept. 19 (Bloomberg) -- Two years ago, Sherry Wang bought a Toyota Camry because it offered a comfortable way to commute to her job as a researcher in the Chinese city of Xian. Lately, shes been taking the bus.
Im afraid that my car or I will become a target of anti-Japanese protesters, who have thronged Chinas streets in recent days, Wang said. I just hope life will get back to normal as quickly as possible.
Wang illustrates why Japanese carmakers such as Toyota Motor Corp., Nissan Motor Co., and Honda Motor Co. are bracing for what may become a bigger crisis in China than last years tsunami in Japan. As violent protests over control of islands claimed by both nations flare up, Chinas Passenger Car Association predicts Japanese brands will lose their lead over German nameplates in the country for the first time since 2005.
The repercussions for Japanese carmakers are very serious and will last for a long time, said Cui Dongshu, deputy secretary general of the Passenger Car Association. There are plenty of choices. Why bother with Japanese brands if there are concerns of safety due to anti-Japan sentiment?
Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/chinese-boycott-hurts-japan-2012-9#ixzz26v1KWdb0
freshwest
(53,661 posts)The resentment over the occupation of Chinese cities prior to and during WW2 would be very hard to forget, including those of Korean descent. But thought all of these nations had trade agreements and prospering together. So much for my information.
Is this just about the islands, or is it economic competition? Does it have anything to do with the recent agreements for the Japanese to work on producing things for the American military?
Any information would be welcome. I hope there will be a quick resolution to this. That was a sad story there of someone feeling they might be attacked for the brand of their auto.
AsahinaKimi
(20,776 posts)http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=1375621
Basically its about the island. The Japanese Government bought the Island from a Japanese family. China said Japan had no right, and said the Islands were technically theirs.. (Yet, they allowed a Japanese family live there? And..the family does own the island.) I was speculating it was about fishing rights as well. There was a story about Chinese fishing boats going there, despite protests from Japan and they were guarded by Armed boats. It maybe over fishing rights, if the islands belonged to Japan, than they would be crossing into Japanese Territorial waters to go fishing. But this has become really messed up...
Here is more..
http://www.anime-island.org/?p=2722
Photos of destruction by Chinese protesters.
http://blog.esuteru.com/archives/6609419.html
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)Lots of gas fields have been found along the maritime boundary between Japan and China, and the Senkaku Islands are also believed to be promising areas for natural gas.
http://www.mod.go.jp/msdf/naha/VOL00/about/img/gasuden.pdf
The fishing flotilla seems to be mostly an intimidation tactic.
It's interesting to note that some Russian experts have speculated that if war broke out between China and Japan over these islands, the Chinese military would be annihilated in 1 or 2 weeks.
http://alfalfalfa.com/archives/5936137.html
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)If embassies become targets, the question becomes why would countries want to continue to have them in foreign countries which essentially attack them.
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)Among the stories covered: One supermarket chain in China had just started selling some Japanese foods earlier this month, but the boycott has resulted in zero sales and the contract to buy more Japanese foods was cancelled.