2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumRomney getting ready to pull the plug in Ohio?
ON today's MJ: "It seems the internals keep getting worse. I had one Republican operative tell me yesterday there's some question about how long they're going to stay in Ohio..."
cindyperry2010
(846 posts)and everybody but them knows it
TroyD
(4,551 posts)I've never heard of a Presidential campaign packing it in in the most important swing state 6 weeks before the election.
Even if Romney is behind, you would assume that with all the money he has from Rove & Koch etc. that it's still worthwhile to keep trying.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)It may not be about giving up on or abandoning a state.
There is a rabid tea-party out there looking for raw meat, and then there is a Romney desperately looking for (perhaps mythic) moderate voters who share some of the 'middleclass values" Mitt says he's marketing.
It seems to me that their thinking is if a state requires a radical message it can be left to the superpacs. On the otherhand if a state is a place where Romney can speak using more mainstream middleclass values, he's going to be there. The result is campaigning on two levels, and attempting to be associated with only the kinder-gentler level.
I think that's how the republican approach is shaping up here in Wisconsin, too.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)They leave it up the the dirty KKK Rove groups and Romney can say "we have nothing to do with that". The problem is most people know the groups are tied to Romney and that will continue to drive up his unfavorable numbers.
Setsuna1972
(332 posts)Boy, to be ready for giving up on Ohio THIS early...and we're not even out of September yet !!!
BeyondGeography
(39,367 posts)leftynyc
(26,060 posts)Even if the campaign doesn't spend a nickle in Ohio, there are tens (perhaps hundreds) of millions on the sidelines right now in the superpacs. They will not give up Ohio this early.
AlinPA
(15,071 posts)catbyte
(34,358 posts)I thought I read somewhere that no GOP candidate in the last 50 years has won without taking Ohio. Wouldn't he have to win like all of the tossup states plus Michigan & Pennsylvania or some convoluted algebra like that if you take Ohio out of the equation? Am I right?
Mom to Taz, Nigel, and baby brother Sammy, members of Dogs Against Romney, Cat Division
"Dogs Arent Luggage--HISS!
and
THANK YOU, DU, FOR SAVING OUR HOMEPURR!
johnnyrocket
(1,773 posts)Of course in reality, if they pull out of Ohio, that's it, they are toast.
AlinPA
(15,071 posts)TexasCPA
(527 posts)Assuming that Obama wins WI & PA. If they lose OH, then they have to win CO, FL, VA, NC and two of these three: NV, NH, and IA.
Third Doctor
(1,574 posts)No republican has ever won the presidency without Ohio. To give this up means he's surrendered the race already.
cash__whatiwant
(396 posts)They have sooooooo much more money than Obama with the super pacs and they don't exactly lack in financial backing. I'm calling bs on that one.