Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Romney getting ready to pull the plug in Ohio? (Original Post) brooklynite Sep 2012 OP
well they are toast cindyperry2010 Sep 2012 #1
Wouldn't that be unprecedented? TroyD Sep 2012 #2
I think it mostly leaves Ohio to those who will follow superpac advertising. HereSince1628 Sep 2012 #6
Sounds about right davidpdx Sep 2012 #11
already ?! Setsuna1972 Sep 2012 #3
No OH, no VA... BeyondGeography Sep 2012 #4
I don't believe it for a minute leftynyc Sep 2012 #5
They have billions available through the SuperPACs for their campaign. AlinPA Sep 2012 #10
If he pulls the plug in Ohio, isn't it pretty much over? catbyte Sep 2012 #7
According to big media, Romney's got this election in the bag. johnnyrocket Sep 2012 #8
They have plenty of money from the Kochs and Adelson so they won't pull out. AlinPA Sep 2012 #9
They can't pull out of Ohio TexasCPA Sep 2012 #12
I don't think so Third Doctor Sep 2012 #13
Doubt it. Why exactly would be the reason? cash__whatiwant Sep 2012 #14

TroyD

(4,551 posts)
2. Wouldn't that be unprecedented?
Wed Sep 19, 2012, 08:39 AM
Sep 2012

I've never heard of a Presidential campaign packing it in in the most important swing state 6 weeks before the election.

Even if Romney is behind, you would assume that with all the money he has from Rove & Koch etc. that it's still worthwhile to keep trying.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
6. I think it mostly leaves Ohio to those who will follow superpac advertising.
Wed Sep 19, 2012, 09:15 AM
Sep 2012

It may not be about giving up on or abandoning a state.

There is a rabid tea-party out there looking for raw meat, and then there is a Romney desperately looking for (perhaps mythic) moderate voters who share some of the 'middleclass values" Mitt says he's marketing.

It seems to me that their thinking is if a state requires a radical message it can be left to the superpacs. On the otherhand if a state is a place where Romney can speak using more mainstream middleclass values, he's going to be there. The result is campaigning on two levels, and attempting to be associated with only the kinder-gentler level.

I think that's how the republican approach is shaping up here in Wisconsin, too.



davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
11. Sounds about right
Wed Sep 19, 2012, 09:51 AM
Sep 2012

They leave it up the the dirty KKK Rove groups and Romney can say "we have nothing to do with that". The problem is most people know the groups are tied to Romney and that will continue to drive up his unfavorable numbers.

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
5. I don't believe it for a minute
Wed Sep 19, 2012, 09:13 AM
Sep 2012

Even if the campaign doesn't spend a nickle in Ohio, there are tens (perhaps hundreds) of millions on the sidelines right now in the superpacs. They will not give up Ohio this early.

catbyte

(34,358 posts)
7. If he pulls the plug in Ohio, isn't it pretty much over?
Wed Sep 19, 2012, 09:15 AM
Sep 2012

I thought I read somewhere that no GOP candidate in the last 50 years has won without taking Ohio. Wouldn't he have to win like all of the tossup states plus Michigan & Pennsylvania or some convoluted algebra like that if you take Ohio out of the equation? Am I right?



Mom to Taz, Nigel, and baby brother Sammy, members of Dogs Against Romney, Cat Division
"Dogs Aren’t Luggage--HISS!”
and
“THANK YOU, DU, FOR SAVING OUR HOME–PURR!”

johnnyrocket

(1,773 posts)
8. According to big media, Romney's got this election in the bag.
Wed Sep 19, 2012, 09:20 AM
Sep 2012

Of course in reality, if they pull out of Ohio, that's it, they are toast.

TexasCPA

(527 posts)
12. They can't pull out of Ohio
Wed Sep 19, 2012, 09:51 AM
Sep 2012

Assuming that Obama wins WI & PA. If they lose OH, then they have to win CO, FL, VA, NC and two of these three: NV, NH, and IA.

Third Doctor

(1,574 posts)
13. I don't think so
Wed Sep 19, 2012, 10:51 AM
Sep 2012

No republican has ever won the presidency without Ohio. To give this up means he's surrendered the race already.

cash__whatiwant

(396 posts)
14. Doubt it. Why exactly would be the reason?
Wed Sep 19, 2012, 11:02 AM
Sep 2012

They have sooooooo much more money than Obama with the super pacs and they don't exactly lack in financial backing. I'm calling bs on that one.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Romney getting ready to p...