Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumIf MSNBC continues to call Sen. Sanders "Democratic Socialist" then I'm going to have to insist
on calling ALL Republicans "Republican Socialists". The only thing that would make things correct in context. I wonder if Comcast gives them $100 Bonus every time they work the word into their spiel. Brian Williams and Chris Matthews seem to have some kind of side bet going on. Damn.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1274 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If MSNBC continues to call Sen. Sanders "Democratic Socialist" then I'm going to have to insist (Original Post)
silvershadow
Mar 2016
OP
awake
(3,226 posts)1. No we should call them Crony Capitalists
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)2. They're wearing their long knives into nubs
By the time the MSM is done, "socialism" will have as much barb to it as 'tall" or "mammalian."
I welcome it.
olddots
(10,237 posts)3. Republican Parasites
has a nice ring to it and MSNBC will be playing re-runs of Cops full time soon because their experiment with " news " is over .
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)4. They should describe HRC as "Autocratic Capitalist". n/t.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)5. This is why Historians will not be kind to Bill Clinton
and the 1996 Telecom. This started with Reagan, but boy is Bill gonna get the majority of the blame for that.