Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bubzer

(4,211 posts)
Wed Mar 9, 2016, 10:38 AM Mar 2016

FiveThirtyEight Stunned By Michigan Results.

Bernie Sanders made folks like me eat a stack of humble pie on Tuesday night. He won the Michigan primary over Hillary Clinton, 50 percent to 48 percent, when not a single poll taken over the last month had Clinton leading by less than 5 percentage points. In fact, many had her lead at 20 percentage points or higher. Sanders’s win in Michigan was one of the greatest upsets in modern political history.

Both the FiveThirtyEight polls-plus and polls-only forecast gave Clinton a greater than 99 percent chance of winning. That’s because polling averages for primaries, while inexact, are usually not 25 percentage points off. Indeed, my colleague Nate Silver went back and found that only one primary, the 1984 Democratic primary in New Hampshire, was even on the same scale as this upset. In that contest, the polling average had Walter Mondale beating Gary Hart by 17 percentage points, but it was Hart who won, with slightly more than 9 percentage points over Mondale.

...
The question I am asking myself now is whether this means the polls are off in other Midwestern states that are holding open primaries. I’m talking specifically about Illinois and Ohio, both of which vote next Tuesday. The FiveThirtyEight polling average in Illinois gives Clinton a 37 percentage point lead, while the average in Ohio gives her a 20 percentage point lead. If Michigan was just a fluke (which is possible), then tonight will be forgotten soon enough. If, however, pollsters are missing something more fundamental about the electorate, then the Ohio and Illinois primaries could be a lot closer than expected.

...
Sanders, however, can breathe a deep sigh of relief that all the states in the Deep South have already voted. He can hope that tonight’s Michigan win will help propel him to victory or at least make him more competitive in states with large delegate prizes left, like California, Florida, Illinois, New York, New Jersey, Ohio and Pennsylvania. We’ll see if it does.


http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/what-the-stunning-bernie-sanders-win-in-michigan-means/
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
FiveThirtyEight Stunned By Michigan Results. (Original Post) Bubzer Mar 2016 OP
Can we finally bury Nate Silver's sterling reputation? FlatBaroque Mar 2016 #1
No Renew Deal Mar 2016 #4
We can bury one thing. virtualobserver Mar 2016 #7
And it utterly blind sided the guy whose entire career is all about seeing what's coming. Bluenorthwest Mar 2016 #12
Nate silver relied too much on meta-polling, when other polls were comprimised. Bubzer Mar 2016 #6
I'm sure many pollsters are. grossproffit Mar 2016 #2
There is another possibility that no one is talking about Renew Deal Mar 2016 #3
I wondered that as well. nt Lucky Luciano Mar 2016 #9
This is a change election and Nate keeps missing that fact. Kip Humphrey Mar 2016 #5
They just need to believe their own statistics Bok_Tukalo Mar 2016 #8
Either something is wrong with their methodology speaktruthtopower Mar 2016 #10
CELL-PHONE-ONLY HOUSEHOLDS -- ARE THEY BEING POLLED? n/t Herman4747 Mar 2016 #11
Some polls include a low percentage of cell phone users jeff47 Mar 2016 #13
Yes, that's like me too! Herman4747 Mar 2016 #14
 

virtualobserver

(8,760 posts)
7. We can bury one thing.
Wed Mar 9, 2016, 10:46 AM
Mar 2016

All of the from Hillary supporters about the polls in upcoming states.

We will in your faces if you do that going forward.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
12. And it utterly blind sided the guy whose entire career is all about seeing what's coming.
Wed Mar 9, 2016, 11:17 AM
Mar 2016

Like many others, Nate is going to struggle with his mistakes more than he had to because he wallowed in self certainty and talked down to anyone who did not agree. When you say one candidate has more than 99% of a chance to win and then that candidate loses, that's not a simple error, that's an indictment of one's entire process and set of protocols.
He's making guesses. Like anyone else.

Bubzer

(4,211 posts)
6. Nate silver relied too much on meta-polling, when other polls were comprimised.
Wed Mar 9, 2016, 10:45 AM
Mar 2016

Essentially, garbage in, garbage out.
As one Hillary reporter would frequently say: "UNSKEW THE POLLS!!!"

Bok_Tukalo

(4,322 posts)
8. They just need to believe their own statistics
Wed Mar 9, 2016, 10:46 AM
Mar 2016

A greater than 99% chance isn't a 100% chance.

If you have a 1 in 100 chance, after about 30 years I would imagine the 1 chance would hit.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
13. Some polls include a low percentage of cell phone users
Wed Mar 9, 2016, 01:47 PM
Mar 2016

but keep in mind most cell phone-only users are like me: Don't answer if we don't recognize the number.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»FiveThirtyEight Stunned B...