32.6% percent of all pledged convention delegates have already been awarded to Hillary, 60/40 margin
from Nate Cohn at NYT:
If Mr. Sanders’s victory in Michigan could be explained easily by some quirk in the state, perhaps Mrs. Clinton and her allies could write it off. But without an explanation, one has to wonder whether it will be the start of a trend — a bad sign for Mrs. Clinton’s chances in other industrial states like Ohio, Illinois, Missouri, Indiana and Pennsylvania. Maybe it’s a reason to take the Sanders campaign’s assertions of strength in California or New York — two states where Mrs. Clinton ought to be favored — more seriously.
But in the end, none of it seems like quite enough for a victory for Mr. Sanders. Mrs. Clinton has already banked too much of a lead. As an example, the PredictWise chances for a Clinton victory changed only from 95 percent to 93 percent from Tuesday to today...
(32.6?) percent of all of the pledged delegates to the Democratic National Convention have already been awarded. She’s won those delegates by roughly a 60-40 margin.
To overcome it, Mr. Sanders will need to do nearly as well from this point on. Not even the very strong showing for Mr. Sanders imagined above would be enough.
In fact, it still wouldn’t be very close. Mr. Sanders basically splits the delegates with Mrs. Clinton the rest of the way — leaving him far short of the big 15-point advantage he needs.
Mrs. Clinton still wins clear victories in diverse or affluent states like Florida, North Carolina, Maryland and New Jersey — the only four states where she breaks 55 percent of the vote in this projection. The problem for Mr. Sanders is that many of these states are far larger than the places where he hopes to excel.
The reality is that the Democratic delegate rules, which award delegates proportionally, make it extremely hard for Mr. Sanders to dig himself out of the hole he’s already in. Indeed, he fell short of winning 60 percent of the delegates in Michigan on Tuesday night, despite the upset win. As a result, his burden in future contests grew a little larger.
Mr. Sanders needs landslides to counter landslides. Not even the results from Tuesday suggest he’s on pace to get them, at least not in states with enough delegates to counter Mrs. Clinton’s lead.
read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/10/upshot/bernie-sanderss-win-in-michiganprobably-wont-change-therace.html?smprod=nytcore-iphone&smid=nytcore-iphone-share&_r=0
= new reply since forum marked as read
...roughly 60/40 
...wait, I think the writer is changing that in his article..
just found this on his twitter:
Datoism @Datoism
@Nate_Cohn i believe there is a mistake in your latest article delegate count
http://goo.gl/CnttoI
Nate Cohn ?@Nate_Cohn 1h1 hour ago
I think this is right/ I messed up. Will correct
