2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumNone Of Sanders Top Earning Staff Are Women
A Jezebel analysis of campaign finance data has found that of the six active presidential campaigns, four have significant gender wage disparities. Most notably, Ted Cruzs campaign on average pays male staffers $20,000 more than female staffers, and of the ten highest paid staffers on Bernie Sanders campaign, not a single one is a woman.
snip
Unless an employee files an official workplace complaint like Davidson did, these campaigns are largely opaque, closed shops. The one thing we do have access to, however, is information about pay.
We looked at year-end finance reports for each campaign to attempt to gauge how close each staff was to gender parity: Do presidential campaigns employ a comparable number of women to men? Do they pay female employees equitably? Are an equal number of women given leadership roles and salaries to match?
snip
Takeaways
Although Bernie Sanders campaign pays women on average a little under $1,000 more than men, the top ten highest-paid employees are all male.
The highest discrepancy we saw is in the Ted Cruz campaign, where male employees make an average of $20,000 more than female employees.
Marco Rubios campaign wins points for the campaign that pays women the best. Women on Rubios staff make, on average, just over $5,000 more than men, and of the 10 highest-paid staffers, six are female.
Hillary Clintons campaign is also fairly equitable, with male and female staffers making essentially the same amount of money. Every campaign (excluding Clintons, which employs 324 women and 202 men) employs significantly more men than women. Of Clintons highest-paid employees, six are male and four are female.
The highest paid staffer is Cruzs political director Mark Campbell, at $192,000. It is impossible to determine which staffer is paid lowest, because of our minimum salary cut off ($24,000).
Sixteen people on Clintons campaign make over $100,000. That number drops precipitously for the other campaigns: Four people on Kasichs campaign, and three on Sanders and Cruzs campaigns respectively, make that much. Only one Rubio staffer makes over $100,000. No one on Trumps team earns in the six figures.
http://theslot.jezebel.com/an-investigation-which-presidential-campaigns-have-the-1762895557?utm_campaign=socialfow_jezebel_twitter&utm_source=jezebel_twitter&utm_medium=socialflow
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)K and R.
HerbChestnut
(3,649 posts)The campaign hired who they thought was most qualified.
Nah, who am I kidding? He's a racist sexist gun loving socialist from lily white Vermont.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)Sounds like he didnt look very hard.
21st Century Poet
(254 posts)When it comes to work, qualifications and results achieved are the most important thing. Just as it doesn't matter that Mrs Clinton's campaign has more women, it also doesn't matter that Mr Sanders's campaign has more men.
Real equality is when workers are workers and their gender is not even a factor.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)21st Century Poet
(254 posts)Last edited Sat Mar 19, 2016, 04:50 PM - Edit history (1)
Who says that a group of women or a group of men cannot be diverse and have different points of view even though they are of the same gender? Diversity and different points of view comes in all sorts of ways from where one grows up to one's education to one's sexual orientation, political ideology, religious faith, life experiences, being a migrant or not and a hundred other things.
Do you think it's wrong that Mrs Clinton's campaign has more women than it does men?
DCBob
(24,689 posts)Keep spinning...
21st Century Poet
(254 posts)Is it wrong for Mrs Clinton's campaign to have more women than it does men?
Outreach to women is important but there is no proof that women were not reached out to by the Sanders campaign. Unless you can prove that women were not allowed to apply for the job or you can prove that women with equal or better qualifications, experience and talent than the men who applied for the job were left out specifically because they are women, then you cannot accuse the Sanders campaign of not reaching out.
If I were to say that Mrs Clinton chose more women than men not because the women happened to be better qualified, more experienced and had better talents than the men who applied but because she thought that having more women on the team would give her a better image, it would be nothing more than wild speculation.
Just as I won't speculate as to why Mrs Clinton's campaign has more women than it does men, I also won't speculate as to why Mr Sanders's campaign has more men than it does women.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)I would think its makes sense to have more women involved in her campaign than men. But clearly she also has lots of men as well to maintain diversity and different point of view and to help with outreach regarding men's issues.
Bernie on the other hand seems to not care about diversity or alternate points of view or outreach to women. No wonder he is losing.
21st Century Poet
(254 posts)1) Don't use double standards. If it's all right for the Clinton campaign to have more women than men, it's equally all right for the Sanders campaign to have more men than it does women.
2) Did you even look at the article in the link? Mr Sanders's campaign is much closer to reaching a 50/50 exact balance between the genders. The Clinton campaign has 122 more women than it does men. The Sanders campaign only has 38 more men than it does women.
3) You seem to imply that only women can care about women's issues. That is, quite frankly, sexist.
4) Mr Sanders has talked about women's issues such as the right to abortion, equal pay and equal opportunities all throughout his campaign so your wild accusations are plainly false.
angrychair
(8,684 posts)He has had a 100% rating from PP and NARAL, every year, since 1993 (as far back as records go).
His campaign is as close to parity on the male/female hiring than any other campaign. Sanders, on average, pays female staffers a $1000 more than other campaigns. His is the only campaign to pay interns and offer health care to campaign staffers.
His two leading and most vocal surrogates are women.
Your Bernie-bashing is hollow and weak.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)DCBob
(24,689 posts)The question remains though why he doesn't have women at the top.
angrychair
(8,684 posts)Has a male campaign manager.
Clinton has 122 more women than men but her campaign manager is a white male like the rest of them. Why? Out of the 122 extra women, she could not find a competent female campaign manger? Does Clinton feel threatened by strong-willed, intelligent and confident women?
A majority, including all leading surrogates, are women or people of color for Sanders. The two women, who are his leading surrogates, are both women and people of color. Clinton cannot say the same.
The leading surrogates for Clinton are white and fabulously wealthy.
See, that sword your swinging cuts both ways.
Response to KittyWampus (Original post)
Cali_Democrat This message was self-deleted by its author.
revbones
(3,660 posts)Some people can only deflect everyting as right-wing tropes for so long before they just give up and print irrelvant crap. Given the slant of the article, I'm assuming that #11 is probably a woman.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)HerbChestnut
(3,649 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)He's worse than Trump!
It must be true, I read it here!
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)Like the last time when she ran, say ugly shit.
The outrage over him not going to the AIPAC meeting is another new one,
somehow his letter explaining why not is a jaw dropper. lol
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Because Jane only verbally challenged Arpaio's racist policies and didn't scream or spit on him she was "schmoozing" with him.
If we could harness the energy generated by the spin here we could power a small country.
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)choie
(4,107 posts)communist, oops I mean racist, no I mean misogynist...
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)Brock has taught them well........
frazzled
(18,402 posts)Like candidate, like followers. It's an important issue to a vast majority of liberals (of whom women themselves constitute a majority).
choie
(4,107 posts)We're all misogynists, even those of us supporters who are women (as I am) We want men to be take all the jobs and to earn more than women..I thought we hid it well, but you're too slick for us!
frazzled
(18,402 posts)Personally, I (who am also a woman) wouldn't want a president with an all male cabinet.
choie
(4,107 posts)indication that Bernie would choose an all male cabinet. What you might want to worry about is Clinton choosing an all Goldman Sachs cabinet, though
dogman
(6,073 posts)"Although Bernie Sanders campaign pays women on average a little under $1,000 more than men". Apparently Jane Sanders is to be ignored also.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)MelissaB
(16,420 posts)Broward
(1,976 posts)Lloyd Blankfein's wife comes to mind.
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)also
Broward
(1,976 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)The article noted that Bernie Sanders campaign pays women on average a little under $1,000 more than men.
But I guess those women don't matter. Only those in the $100,000 and up club matter to the Clinton feminists.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)Jenny_92808
(1,342 posts)LOVE LOVE LOVE that ignore feature! Oh, and I get the pleasure of doing the full-ignore to the OP. Poof!
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)MaggieD
(7,393 posts)imagine2015
(2,054 posts)That's what the article says.
And Hillary pays 16 staffers over $100,000 while Sanders has only 3 staffers making that much money.
What's Sanders trying to do, buy loyalty?
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)But the Berniebros are a myth right?
Aerows
(39,961 posts)LexVegas
(6,031 posts)melman
(7,681 posts)seeing as they'll be going out of business soon.