I laughed so hard I had to give the damn thing a rec.

For God's sake, do not let the truth stands in the way of a good story!

ratfcking and trolling, rather than being dumb enough to believe quite literally any and everything we see that's negative about our opponents right?

You might want to learn a thing or two about how one vets sources, and takes care to call out idiots rather than rec'ing them and taking any lie as gospel, like those CT ones so many were posting all over GD-P pretty much every time Bernie loses.

Such ludicrous lies are usually CONs.

"It may be hard for your viewers to remember how difficult it was for people to talk about HIV/AIDS back in the 1980s and because of both president and Mrs. Reagan — in particular Mrs. Reagan — we started a national conversation, when before nobody would talk about it, nobody wanted to do anything about it, and that too is something I really appreciate with her very effective low-key advocacy. It penetrated the public conscience and people began to say, hey, we have to do something about this too."- Hillary Clinton

This is a part of it. I live with no illusion that he isn't a politician, but he is better than most. That directly relates to his lack of influence. It's a seriously dirty game.

I addressed the headline. Zero reason to read past it.

And in the next he's a mastermind on the take.

Also Hillary won't be honest until she comes up off those transcripts.

I've ever seen.

Bragging that he doesn't have a super PAC when he actually has three. Improperly trying to access a candidate's records and then FUNDRAISING off of that when they're caught. The sliming of everyone that doesn't support him as "establishment." And that's just what I feel like typing right now. I have never seen anything like it.

And Sanders sending women to campaign on Tinder, forcing Tinder to chuck them out.

What in the world???!!

I have now read three different sources say this but I have not gotten any explanation of it.

I had to look up tinder. Too sad.

How negative aspects of his campaign end up filling his campaign account. Something bad happens and he sends out letters designed to tap into and generate more anger leading to huge hauls of cash. He knows his base of support extremely well.

Let it be CONFIRMED, reaffirmed, disaffirmed or whatever it needs to be to get you to float on and stop regaling me with your perpetually angry, wanna be tough guy bullshit.

because individuals can only contribute 2,700

is all I'm gonna say.

Honestly, it looks like something a mean Bernie supporter might use to be disrespectful. I near spit out my drink lol.

damn.

Women don't always have to smile. And we're electing a president not a supermodel. But if you want to know I just happen to like that particular picture.

thank you for having a picture of Hillary that isn't brushed up, lighted perfectly, softening. Thank you for showing her for what she is, a person, with physical flaws and imperfections. For me, you have the post of the day.

thats Clinton's forte.

I am sure that I don't want any of it, as Richard Nixon was a presidential candidate once upon a time.

I only skimmed Skinner's lengthy OP... what's the deal with those with multiple hides? Are time-outs gone forever? Or are the Admins getting more involved in the outright banning of disruptors? Meh. I'll read the entire thing tomorrow.

but transparency pages will continue to show up after 5 hides.

I think they can still see replies, but can no longer participate in the thread. Unless that's changed under the new "amnesty" policy... dang, I gotta read that thing in full.

I've been on here since 2004. Never has been this nasty or rulie.

often hears the word unruly but never hear ruly. Well, if a kid who cuts up all the time is unruly, why
wouldn't a well behaved child be call a "ruly" child?

How about longevity? But, never shortgevity. I made that word up to describe the brief time the human race is going to last on Earth, about 225,000 yrs. The human race will break the shortgevity record among all animals that went extinct. (That's sadder than it is funny.)

jumping on this obvious garbage. Self delete to save some face.

I've been cleaning up..it's important to sanitize one's desktop from time to time. Wouldn't want to get any of that on me.

LOL

Honestly, have no idea what motivates poster but, seems some research should have been done before bringing this tripe here to DU.

Leads me to believe the poster just does not care about policies, procedures and protocols.

Interesting that Hillary supporters on Kos rejected the hit piece; will Hillary supporters on DU do the same? Some appear to have no integrity whatsoever.

insulted for Bernie.

Anyone who buys the lies is too gullible to vote. But they do, unfortunately.

with pride.

Diarist has been banned from KOS.

the source for this seems kinda questionable...

and some in DU's Camp Weathervane appear to be gobbling it up. Jaysuz, I'd be embarrassed!

We need someone to make a tarnished bust of capeheart for a new award... Journalistic lack of integrity. Awarded to those that knowingly, or after provided facts, dig in, or just ignore what they've done.

It's the doubling-down that I find fascinating... whether some no-name Kos diarist or a "journalist" at the "esteemed" Washington Post.

did I read that Lime Jello Cheese Salad recipe? I may never recover....

that did it for me...

I'd have missed those if you hadn't shared, and I needed the laugh!

So, Bernie was caucusing with the Democrats and raising money legally--for the party--just like everybody else has to do? Wow! What a news breakthrough!

Better pace yourself, it's a long time till the convention yet.

I remember reading the first paragraph and getting out of there real fast...it was the day after the primaries and I had better thiings to do than to look at this mess...

First, Hillary is honest about the money

I don't believe that Hillary (or any other politiican) is honest about all their money.

Yeah, I agree about that money thing.

of what Hillary supporters believe.

Neither proof nor truth matter, those posts have to do with the "BIG LIE" Strategy that Brock and the Clinton campaign are using as a large tool in their dirty tricks box.

His "internet specialists" (legal supposedly, but based on a very loose interpretation of a loop hole)
can be paid by a super-PAC to coordinate directly with her campaign if it is only involved via the internet,

Some of these employees are paid to post an all forms of social media, and often do, especially when it regards the Big Lie tactics when they are used, which rely on repetition of the lie in order to make people believe the lie even when faced with solid facts to the contrary.

Expect these lies to be continuously spread, along with other lies pushed as truth via the Big Lie tactic that they have been employing liberally. (perhaps the only true sentence involving the word liberally in connection with Clinton, a right wing candidate within the Democratic party.)

If anyone said this about "it's my turn HRC" it would have been LOCKED and hidden.

People who post this kind of garbage aren't seen as very...well, the punishment is self-inflicted, and I'll leave it there.

Lots of detail and it names names quite a bit...

http://www.nybooks.com/daily/2016/01/30/clinton-system-donor-machine-2016-election/

It has a ton of info on the Clintons' "humanitarian fund for global charity" too.

In the 1980s we used to call it money-laundering.

(Be sure to check out post #1 before leaving this thread.)


Another foul shot from across the room and bang, into the Trash Can.

'
Clinton for you. It does not matter how many times something is debunked as a lie, they will repeat it.

Hillary's bank money goes to a humanitarian fund

I realize that the opposing team is prone to pouncing on every little bit of right wingnut bullshit in an effort to smear Hillary, but we don't have to stoop to that level.

Can someone help us Hillary supporters out?

Everyone else, Hillary supporters included, are laughing at this ridiculous and unsupportable pile of prose worthy of Tiger Beat. Best of luck to you.

Then there are the supporters like yourself affecting that this is not a steaming heap of yesterday's dross. You should discuss with your own fellow supporters why they look like reasonable persons while you and the OP look like people tearing down the Democratic Party with mendacity, all for your own personal jollies. It's not 'us Hillary supporters' it's just the few reckless casters of constant bait. Same crowd that defended the Reagan Worship. That crowd, your crowd, has no credibility with me at all. Not a principled atom in their beings. They use democracy as their dodge ball.

'us Hillary supporters' can't see what's wrong with this piece of shit OP. You are affecting to speak for a group which has members who do not agree with you and who are saying so in this thread. Your 'us Hillary supporters' is a bullshit tactic in which you as an individual dress yourself up as 'us Hillary supporters'. So you should ask those among your own team who see the problems with this OP to explain it to you in language you can accept from persons you don't hold in contempt.

My point is that you speak for yourself alone, not for 'Us Hillary supporters'.

Be proud. Really.

Except for the boiled bones.

There's always something to ruin the fun.

This OP is fucking absurd.

Boy, the repeat offenders are really going to town now that there's no time outs. Like 5 year olds in a candy store where everything is free!!!



Haven't stopped projecting yet I see... Hillary supporters being 'concerned' about lying.

.

First, Hillary is honest about the money,

Scrupulously honest to a fault.

Recced.

🤔

The smear campaign is on, and that's fine... but it says something when people are willingly spreading. The DNC is in trouble and the moderates who act more like republicans are the reason why.

I've got a lot of thoughts on the topic, but it's just so infuriating and people tend to tune angry folks out. The Democratic Party is shooting itself in the foot and there doesn't seem to be a lot of ways to stop it at this point. Seems that big moneyed interests have too much at stake.

Even though I found your post without merit I helped save it from an unnecessary hide. You're welcome.

On Sat Mar 19, 2016, 10:17 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

Bernie Sanders may go down in history as the most dishonest presidential candidate we’ve ever had.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511534917

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

This is so OTT false that the DKos diarist who posted it has already been banned (http://www.dailykos.com/user/Hello%20Dolly%20Llama). Spirited debate is one thing, but outright lies about any of our candidates have no place here.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sat Mar 19, 2016, 10:24 PM, and the Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: It may be completely false, but it's their own view point. I'm in favor of having as many viewpoints as possible around here. Let the BS be called out in the comments in a nice way (if possible) as opposed to calling for the post to be hidden via jury.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: If you know it's BS than most everyone else does too. Being at DU is like raising kids. I ignore the behavior I don't want.
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: What a steaming pile of horseshit

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

Yes, everyone, let's call out the blatant lies in a "nice way"!

Have alerts always been reviewed by the site admins, or is that a new thing, along with "amnesty"?

They didn't find a problem with this post and let the lies stand.

Consistent.

sow division... are let back in. Why?

I'm glad I only contributed $10 to this site.

from the bottom of my heart