That's great. I wonder how the left coast is gonna vote....

From the link:

absolutely no surprise there. A friend of mine moved there from Minneapolis says it's a way more liberal city. Minneapolis is about 70% Liberal, although the vote doesn't always go that way.

Seattle is filling up quickly with overpaid tech workers and housing costs are insane. Yet I'd bet a lot of people at the rally were young tech workers. It will be interesting to watch the news tonight.

probably even worse than Seattle, as these are tech workers who live in the very expensive city and commute in special buses south to silicon valley tech employers. Resentment is quite high among older (often poorer) SF residents.

Did you read the NYTimes article a few months ago on how Amazon treats its workers? Jeff Bezos, founder and CEO of Amazon, which is headquartered in Seattle, treats them like dirt. The article said it is not unusual to see people weeping at their desks. Very upsetting article.

Bezos bought the Washington Post a couple of years ago and now they run pro-Hillary pieces and hit jobs on Bernie.

I don't know what will happen in Seattle. I lived there years ago when it was still affordable. It was charming.

Seattle will need to work harder not to become SF. Anazon has tsken over downtown, luxury apartments being built everywhere, evictions going up. Ick.

we will start on our path toward a more just society. So, over time, things will be changing for the better. Because somebody has to set about reversing the damage done by Reaganomics, and he's the only one with the will to do it.

Does she do them or only fund raisers?

There were about twenty people in attendance, and they all looked bored to tears, with their hands folded and zero expressions.

And then she uses the money to finance Rovian tactics (cheating) which in the general election will not work because the Republicans are so much better at stealing elections!

The Hillary supporters say that the Bernie supporters MUST vote for Hillary; however, since she will have lied and cheated her way to the nomination if she gets it and since she CAN NOT win the general election, why would we vote for her???!!!

If I were elderly, poor, a person of color, etc., I would be a fool to vote for her. The Clintons have already eviscerated these groups. They vote for her at their own peril.

Remember that the Clinton's are suppressing the vote when they visit polling places. Show them now and later you don't like it. Vote for the one who didn't cheat against us to win. We would have to be fools to support her now.

Used to be that the limit was 5% then Kentucky went...what was it...19% or more in the last election for governor. I do not know why no one acts. How many of us signed the petition for the attorney general of Mass. to arrest Bill Clinton and that went nowhere. Other than Iowa, where the coin tosses appear to have been rigged, Hillary does not win any caucuses where it is more difficult to rig the outcome. Then look at the expat vote: 70% Bernie and 30% Hillary.

We are not stupid! Why would we vote for a cheater? We are NOT Republicans!!!!!

They are lawless by instinct. Like Bush, they are part of the wrecking crew.

I don't see how we can afford a Clinton presidency.

and closely cropped photos...and lots of photos of massive Bernie rallies. The photos may be cropped because:

They know the fix is in.

She's the corporate candidate, the big media candidate, the entrenched Dem party candidate already. So they know that's what counts and they've got it in the bag.

Those Yuge crowds for Bernie are the "dreamers" and the "children," --people with no clout, no influence. No power except for numbers.

They're smug, power hungry, hierarchical, and corrupt.

What's not to love about that??

...because they're smarter than us. We're delusional to want anything better.

This really is like dealing with a Republican attitude. Feels so familiar.

That's why many among us are saying "no to all."

dealing with Republicans. Same attitude. Same, actually, "Bro" attitude: brash, superior, arrogant, insensitive, triumphant, dominant.

It's ironic that they accuse us of that, when it fits them to a T.

That, alone, would make be balk at joining their forces. But of course there are stronger reasons, not the least of which is their candidate.

You can't just let us be happy? How can it hurt you?

Making over $350,000. Isn't that interesting?

Don't get me wrong it's my city, and I love, love it here but WA will go to Sanders, Hillary will get some delagates of course. It won't change the ultimate outcome, but it will be a good day for those who support Sanders and want good news.

You know, to go along with his top-dog, arrogant, white man PRIVILEGED life.

That says something about you, the other Hill supporters who do it, and about your candidate.

None of it is good.

But hey now you get to say the big bad Hrmjustin is persecuting Snders suppoters.

Bye now.

The only reason you gave for being happy that she's winning is that she's winning. That's pretty empty. Winning for the sake of winning is not how politics is supposed to work.

.

nor Hillary either

Just saying.

Apparently size of rallies doesn't translate into showing up at the voting booth on election day.

Go figure.

What's happening out there is positive, good, and real.

And there was no MSM there?

Geez.

against him.

What Bernie has is lots and lots of people who believe in his vision, want to hear his message, and send him whatever they can.

Truly a people's campaign.

at the border.

This campaign is far from over!

#StillSanders

The other candidate has the MSM, but Bernie has the people.

Sadly, though, those who don't know how or don't have time to find non-MSM sources of information are being misled about the two candidates.

We'll just have to keep working on it with Twitter, Facebook, internet message boards, word of mouth, and rallies.

We ARE the grassroots.

I believe in People Power.

all it will do is mess up traffic. Going to have to delay museum trip.

I will never understand why people have that sort of adoration for a politician. Any politician.

...and they are really, really sour.

So no sour grapes here. Bernie specializes in talking AT people. Hillary specializes in talking WITH people. Some people prefer to be screamed at, have an old man shake his finger at them, whatever. But not the majority.

Bernie give speeches to tens of thousands of enthusiastic Americans who WANT to hear what he has to say.

Hill has private soirees with wealthy donors.

And he is losing the popular vote by 2.75 million so far. In addition, he would lose badly in a general election after all his socialist (and yes, communist) statements were made public by Republicans.

Bernie will not be president because we, the people, will not even nominate him let alone elect him.

Not if the term refers to any recognizable values and principles.

about us, while Hillary talks about herself. Some people prefer to be screamed at, have an old lady shake her finger at them, whatever.
How sexist does that look when the gender is reversed. SMH

--that alone causes adoration in this country, where truth is in short supply.

I believe Liz Warren would have drawn just as big if not bigger crowds.

It will continue after he concedes. It really is not about him.

And he screams it while shaking his finger. I suppose it works for the disaffected. It does nothing for many of us, as the election results show.

I heard she met with over 30 millionaires today to get more "support" (i.e. money) from them.
I mean Bernie has excitement and fervor among the people but Hillary has money from the upper 1%. Yea, that's real America! (not)

eom

Still in.

We just got in line. .. maybe we can meet and say hi somewhere in the middle of this crazy awesome crowd ....

Thanks for the thread, grasswire.

Now, if they were camping out at polling places, I'd understand.

I wish every upcoming weather pattern had that party opportunity.