Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 01:17 PM Mar 2016

Who, exactly, are the ‘Berniebros?’

ICYMI.

Source: Washington Post by Philip Bump

On Sunday, Bill Clinton — himself white and male and straight — called out Internet attacks on his wife stemming from supporters of Bernie Sanders. Referring to the Nation's Joan Walsh, Clinton said that Walsh "and other people who have gone online to defend Hillary, to explain why they supported her, have been subject to vicious trolling and attacks that are literally too profane often — not to mention sexist — to repeat," according to reporting from CBS News.

This was a pointed reference to the group of supporters of Bernie Sanders commonly known as "Berniebros," in the evocative formulation coined by the Atlantic's Rob Meyer. "Berniebros," as a concept, refers to presumably young, presumably white and most-definitely male backers of Sanders who launch the sorts of attacks to which Bill Clinton was referring and the sorts of attacks that have become part of the everyday life of women online: harassing, offensive, vituperative.

On CNN's "State of the Union" on Sunday, Sanders disavowed such behavior.

"Have you heard about this phenomenon, the Berniebro?" CNN's Jake Tapper asked.

"Yes, I have heard about it. It's disgusting," Sanders replied. "Look, we don't want that crap. We can — and we will do everything we can, and I think we have tried. Look, anybody who is supporting me, is doing sexist things is — we don't want them. I don't want them. That is not what this campaign is about."

Read it all at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/02/08/are-the-berniebros-a-problem-of-politics-or-one-of-internet-culture/


98 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Who, exactly, are the ‘Berniebros?’ (Original Post) yallerdawg Mar 2016 OP
Bernie Is The Only Antidote To Rampant DNC DWS DLC HRC Third-Way Corporatist Corruption cantbeserious Mar 2016 #1
And don't forget the sociopathic warmongering for profit. CoffeeCat Mar 2016 #10
Corporatist Corruption Includes The MIC War For Profit Machine For This Citizen cantbeserious Mar 2016 #12
Because the warmongering is so egregious CoffeeCat Mar 2016 #37
To The MIC Corporate Profiteers And Their Political Minions - War Deaths Are Mere Demonstrations cantbeserious Mar 2016 #39
BS The Second Stone Mar 2016 #83
Name a movement/change that didn't have a leader snowy owl Mar 2016 #89
This country is not falling apart. The Second Stone Mar 2016 #92
They attack Joy Reid all the time. Disgusting. nt LexVegas Mar 2016 #2
Calling her out for her biased reporting is not "attacking" her. Fawke Em Mar 2016 #45
I've been accused of being one, and I guess President Obama is one too. Electric Monk Mar 2016 #3
Bernie wasn't running in 08...and the Berniebros were probably in middle school... anotherproletariat Mar 2016 #5
Berniebros were in middle school? pinebox Mar 2016 #16
I give credit to those old enough to have their own kids the ability to control their tempers anotherproletariat Mar 2016 #24
'Berniebros' were called 'Obama boys' in 2008 frylock Mar 2016 #68
When media silences or show preference for a candidate, agitated supporters fight back snowy owl Mar 2016 #90
They're a made up "phenomenon" and anyone who bought into it was suckered by Hillary's version vintx Mar 2016 #4
I wonder what Elizabeth Warren thinks? yallerdawg Mar 2016 #8
Senator Warren does not have her head up her ass FlatBaroque Mar 2016 #25
That would be Sanders' "ratfucking" too since he called them it and denounced them. nt stevenleser Mar 2016 #97
WATCH THIS VIDEO! snowy owl Mar 2016 #93
Then add Sanders name to that list since he called them out and denounced them nt stevenleser Mar 2016 #96
They are the people that relentlessly attacked Sen. Warren workinclasszero Mar 2016 #6
So much.. quickesst Mar 2016 #15
Very much so workinclasszero Mar 2016 #21
Yes... quickesst Mar 2016 #34
Concocted David Brockian style lies designed to denigrate and slander an entire group. CoffeeCat Mar 2016 #43
The really extraordinary thing is the amount of EFFORT they put into this weird bullshit sibelian Mar 2016 #54
Okey dokey... quickesst Mar 2016 #63
Mostly innuendo and assumptions and defensiveness about being attacked on substance. highprincipleswork Mar 2016 #7
They attack civil rights icons too. nt LexVegas Mar 2016 #9
Shamefully true workinclasszero Mar 2016 #22
. sibelian Mar 2016 #46
Actually, no they don't. Fawke Em Mar 2016 #50
That was the worse. And they've even attacked Elizabeth Warren for not endorsing him. It's laughable Hoyt Mar 2016 #60
Who are they? noretreatnosurrender Mar 2016 #11
The imaginary Berniebros. yallerdawg Mar 2016 #13
Really? noretreatnosurrender Mar 2016 #18
Did Brock come up with Obama boys in 2008, too? IOW, I don't think it's Brock. merrily Mar 2016 #19
This message was self-deleted by its author FlatBaroque Mar 2016 #27
Well this might help you out Andy823 Mar 2016 #84
What does your continuing, um, interest in Manny have to do my question about Brock and 2008? merrily Mar 2016 #85
Actually I asked Andy823 Mar 2016 #86
Yes, your lack of interest in Manny is clear. merrily Mar 2016 #87
I rec'd that. It was a great OP I miss Manny Autumn Mar 2016 #95
Good that Sanders recognizes his campaign is attracting some "disgusting" behavior. I wonder why Hoyt Mar 2016 #14
No his campaign is not attracting disgusting behavior, nor is his campaign stirring it or lying merrily Mar 2016 #17
Read the OP, he calls it "disgusting." Christ, you guys don't even trust your candidate. Hoyt Mar 2016 #38
He did NOT call his campaign disgusting or say his campaign was attracting bad behavior. merrily Mar 2016 #40
I really wouldn't have your patience with this. sibelian Mar 2016 #47
Some post on the thread should be accurate, don't you think? merrily Mar 2016 #51
Yes. sibelian Mar 2016 #52
Well, if his some of his supporters are doing it to extent Sanders calls their behavior "disgusting, Hoyt Mar 2016 #59
Oh it certainly is MaggieD Mar 2016 #44
MaggieD and Hoyt mischaracterizing in order to "catapult the propaganda." merrily Mar 2016 #48
"Have you heard about this phenomenon, the Berniebro?" CNN's Jake Tapper asked. Hoyt Mar 2016 #61
Why are you wasting your time and mine? That quote does not say his campaign attracted or caused merrily Mar 2016 #64
Well, how the heck did they end up Sanders' supporters? Sanders and the campaign attracted them. Hoyt Mar 2016 #65
There is a difference between attracting a vote and attracting bad behavior. How about this: merrily Mar 2016 #67
Apparently Sanders recognizes something in his supporters that you guys don't see. Hoyt Mar 2016 #70
Apparently, you can't stop falsely claiming he said his campaign attracted bad behavior. He did not. merrily Mar 2016 #71
So how did they get among the ranks of Sanders' supporters? Hoyt Mar 2016 #72
Asked and answered. Dude, please stop wasting your time repeating the same nonsense over and over. merrily Mar 2016 #73
The "disgusting" behavior is vile sexism and hateful misogyny. yallerdawg Mar 2016 #81
"Stop smearing Democrats. MelissaB Mar 2016 #94
All campaigns attract disgusting behavior hellofromreddit Mar 2016 #41
It's also not only Bernie's supporters. Every time I've posted substance anywhere online merrily Mar 2016 #56
I still like Bernie griffi94 Mar 2016 #20
We got the same thing during the Scottish Independence referendum - "cybernats". sibelian Mar 2016 #23
Just found my new user name: Chutney Ferret Thanks. / FlatBaroque Mar 2016 #29
A Mythical Beast made up by Clinton's Third Way Smear Machine FreakinDJ Mar 2016 #26
Did you read the part... yallerdawg Mar 2016 #30
Clinton used the same Smear Tactics against Obama in 2008 FreakinDJ Mar 2016 #32
Obama Boys 2.0, duh! Kip Humphrey Mar 2016 #28
What Senator Sanders (I-VT)* says: yallerdawg Mar 2016 #33
because he's busy campaign and isn't occupying himself with Hillary crap. Kip Humphrey Mar 2016 #35
The article identifies where this originated back in October. yallerdawg Mar 2016 #49
Can't wait 'til your candidate loses. Fawke Em Mar 2016 #55
They are the subset of internet trolls mythology Mar 2016 #31
Movie Line Billsmile Mar 2016 #36
Bernie would have had a better chance if.... MaggieD Mar 2016 #42
His supporters show ZERO tolerance for anyone that doesn't' agree with their position. Trust Buster Mar 2016 #53
This is from February 9th. Why is is being posted now? Answer: For no constructive reason. n/t Tom Rinaldo Mar 2016 #57
So you find stupid shit annoying? yallerdawg Mar 2016 #58
Joan Walsh's article on these attacks was very moving to me Gothmog Mar 2016 #62
Sexist? When people point out her positions it is NOT sexist. FFS!! jillan Mar 2016 #66
I suspect there's a strong Gamer-Gater faction among Sanders supporters... CalvinballPro Mar 2016 #69
I'm Jewish, so I'm more like a Berniebroberg. Warren DeMontague Mar 2016 #74
A lot of Bernie Bros have always been the way they are. Basically, internet trolls. kcr Mar 2016 #75
meanwhile, ACTUAL bigotry gets a pass. Warren DeMontague Mar 2016 #77
What? No giant cereal box gif? n/t kcr Mar 2016 #78
Sure, if you want it. It's actually a .jpg, though, not a gif. Warren DeMontague Mar 2016 #79
I had a run in with a Bernie Bro today. ZX86 Mar 2016 #76
BERNIEBROS WILTED MY LETTUCE AND GAVE ME RING AROUND THE COLLAR! Warren DeMontague Mar 2016 #80
This video exposes the vile underbelly of the berniebro scourge. Watch ... IF YOU DARE! Warren DeMontague Mar 2016 #82
No worries, I got the memo Lazy Daisy Mar 2016 #88
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2016 #91
Here: Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #98

CoffeeCat

(24,411 posts)
10. And don't forget the sociopathic warmongering for profit.
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 01:26 PM
Mar 2016

Robert Kagan, the founder of the neocon movement, endorsed Hillary. That's right. He took a look at all of the candidates, including Republicans, and decided that Hillary was his favorite.

Never, ever thought I'd see the day when the cancer that is the neocons would metastasize itself inside the Democratic party. But here it is. And here we are.

Just in case anyone wants to downplay Kagan's letter of recommendation for Hillary--it's important to note that Hillary hand picked Kagan to be one of her foreign-policy advisers while she was Sec of State.

I mean, this guy is hard core. He hatched the entire neocon plan with Bill Kristol. It's actually a business plan that should be titled, "How to make your corporate pals rich and all you have to do is murder millions of people and decimate a few Middle East countries!"

One of the countries on the neocon hit list is Libya. And Hillary sure handed them Libya on a silver platter. Libya is now a failed state with no government and untold numbers fleeing into Europe. But of course she gave them Libya. Kagan was advising Hillary along the way.

Read "Rebuilding America's Defenses", the neocon manifesto, if you are interested in their war plan. The plan was hatched in 1996. It's fucking frightening. Iran is next.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/pdf/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf

We don't have to accept this hell. Vote for Bernie.

CoffeeCat

(24,411 posts)
37. Because the warmongering is so egregious
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 02:24 PM
Mar 2016

I lobby that warmongering always be discussed as a standalone topic--because of how incredibly sick and dastardly the whole neocon plan is.

Murdering millions of innocent people, causing untold suffering, starvation and homelessness while hollowing out entire countries--all for profit--deserves its own special category.

I remember when the neocons were just getting started. They gained their foothold in Iraq. I read their entire plan and saw that Syria, Libya and Iran were also on their hit list. I was so proud of my fellow DUers. This was the one place on the Internet where Democrats could do to grieve and express disgust for the neocons and their warmongering.

And look at us now! Our front-runner is a neocon cheerleader who surrounds herself with neocons. Why would Hillary have hand picked Robert Kagan--the founder of the neocon movement--to be one of her foreign-policy advisers while she was Secretary of State? He's worse than Cheney. He originated the entire war plan! He's like the Tony Soprano of the neocons--but without the feckless charm.

I don't get how anyone justifies such atrocities. Then again, history has shown us that people are more than willing to look the other way and rationalize when atrocities are happening.

cantbeserious

(13,039 posts)
39. To The MIC Corporate Profiteers And Their Political Minions - War Deaths Are Mere Demonstrations
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 02:28 PM
Mar 2016

Of product quality.

In the end, the Corporate Profiteers and Their Political Minions chuckle all the way to the bank as they have duped the dead and 99% yet again.

 

The Second Stone

(2,900 posts)
83. BS
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 05:34 PM
Mar 2016

He's just a man, and one that is losing and will lose at that. This obsession with the charisma of one man, rather than working for changes in institutions is just childish. What you are basically saying is that after this mere mortal is gone from this earth, there is no hope for any of us.

Government isn't a charisma cult. It's hard work and compromising.

snowy owl

(2,145 posts)
89. Name a movement/change that didn't have a leader
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 06:32 PM
Mar 2016

Leaders are important and they come along rarely or haven't you noticed that this country is falling apart even though many of us have been working for change since the nineties?

 

The Second Stone

(2,900 posts)
92. This country is not falling apart.
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 07:16 PM
Mar 2016

Yes, leaders are important, but there are usually others who can take up the mantle when the leader retires. Who are the people who are the next generation of Bro leaders?

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
45. Calling her out for her biased reporting is not "attacking" her.
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 02:39 PM
Mar 2016

What's disgusting is that we have so many media types that are so biased.

 

anotherproletariat

(1,446 posts)
5. Bernie wasn't running in 08...and the Berniebros were probably in middle school...
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 01:22 PM
Mar 2016

Obama campaign strategies had nothing to do with them.

 

pinebox

(5,761 posts)
16. Berniebros were in middle school?
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 01:34 PM
Mar 2016

That's cute.
Sorry but many of us supporting Bernie have our own kids who are old enough to vote.



 

anotherproletariat

(1,446 posts)
24. I give credit to those old enough to have their own kids the ability to control their tempers
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 01:53 PM
Mar 2016

in matters involving politics. I assume the Berniebros would be young and 'invincible'.

snowy owl

(2,145 posts)
90. When media silences or show preference for a candidate, agitated supporters fight back
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 07:08 PM
Mar 2016

There is a contingent of Hillary supports that have a lot of attention via media and they use it to support one candidate over another. They should expect some blowback when they do that. About the only two women I can think of with any national exposure that are pro-Bernie are Katrina Vanderheuval and Nina Turner. What do you expect when all of media is providing free advertising for Hillary? Joan Baez - anybody remember her? - is for Sanders. When people don't feel like they have a voice, some fight back in less-than-civil ways. They shouldn't but I understand it.

And many Clinton supporters seem to think that pointing out Clinton's policy issues is attacking Clinton. Hard to have a conversation when you do that. And hard to have a conversation when one candidate can't be heard and has limited presence in media. Think about it.

 

vintx

(1,748 posts)
4. They're a made up "phenomenon" and anyone who bought into it was suckered by Hillary's version
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 01:21 PM
Mar 2016

of the VRWC (anyone care to rename this for her since she's all in now?)


FlatBaroque

(3,160 posts)
25. Senator Warren does not have her head up her ass
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 01:58 PM
Mar 2016

She is quite well aware of the Clinton ratfucking empire.

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
6. They are the people that relentlessly attacked Sen. Warren
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 01:24 PM
Mar 2016

on her Facebook page because she failed to endorse Bernie.

quickesst

(6,280 posts)
15. So much..
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 01:33 PM
Mar 2016

... for the Bernie Bros "phenomenon" being made up by the Clinton campaign or anyone else. They're real and they're nasty.

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
21. Very much so
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 01:41 PM
Mar 2016

They have done serious damage to Bernie's campaign.

I'm surprised his supporters try to defend them or try to pretend they don't exist.

quickesst

(6,280 posts)
34. Yes...
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 02:20 PM
Mar 2016

One of the biggest problems Bernie's sincere supporters continue to ignore, and the risk of anyone doubting that sincerity is something they're not willing to chance,

CoffeeCat

(24,411 posts)
43. Concocted David Brockian style lies designed to denigrate and slander an entire group.
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 02:35 PM
Mar 2016

You insist on calling names, like some kind of middle-schooler--while suggesting that Bernie supporters are such horrifying people. "Nasty" people, to use your words.

I've been to many Bernie campaign events, worked with many Bernie supporters and met and worked with thousands of volunteers. All of the women in my book club are Bernie supporters. All ten of us. We all have teenage kids and many of them support Bernie. I've had fund raisers for Bernie in my home and hosted Bernie supporters from the West Coast.

I've never met anyone who fits your cartoon-like, made-up slur.

Your stereotyping is nothing but manufactured baloney. Just as the "Obama Boyz" was manufactured baloney from 2008. They didn't exist. Your slur doesn't exist and it doesn't represent Bernie supporters.

But what do you care? Name calling is so fun. So classy.


sibelian

(7,804 posts)
54. The really extraordinary thing is the amount of EFFORT they put into this weird bullshit
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 02:47 PM
Mar 2016

Despite the fact that the only people who pay any real attention to it or take it even vaguely seriously are the other people already in their own camp.

quickesst

(6,280 posts)
63. Okey dokey...
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 03:35 PM
Mar 2016

"You insist on calling names, like some kind of middle-schooler--while suggesting that Bernie supporters are such horrifying people. "Nasty" people, to use your words."

I never said all Bernie's supporters as you infer. If you wish to include yourself in my description, that's your problem. If you wish to ignore some of the things Hillary Clinton and her supporters have been called, that's your prerogative. It would have to be some kind of record for cherry picking. Comparatively, "nasty" is a compliment.

 

highprincipleswork

(3,111 posts)
7. Mostly innuendo and assumptions and defensiveness about being attacked on substance.
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 01:24 PM
Mar 2016

Cleverly used to nullify valid criticisms and commentary through a broad-sweep swiftboating of the Sanders campaign.

I'm not saying it's not "clever". I'm not saying it's effective. I'm saying it's extremely disingenuous (every campaign has its extremists, but it has been revealed that some of the alleged perpetrators are neither male at all nor Bernie supporters), inauthentic, and a blatant political ploy.



Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
50. Actually, no they don't.
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 02:42 PM
Mar 2016

I checked every single Twitter account linked in stories about "Bernie Bros" attacking John Lewis and found TWO who were or might be supporters (ironically, both of those supporters were also AAs). All the others were either right-wingers or people who showed no political affiliation to any candidate on their feeds.

Sorry, you're wrong about this. Why do Hillarians believe the media so much when they know of the biases?

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
60. That was the worse. And they've even attacked Elizabeth Warren for not endorsing him. It's laughable
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 03:18 PM
Mar 2016

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
13. The imaginary Berniebros.
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 01:30 PM
Mar 2016
"Yes, I have heard about it. It's disgusting," Sanders replied. "Look, we don't want that crap. We can — and we will do everything we can, and I think we have tried. Look, anybody who is supporting me, is doing sexist things is — we don't want them. I don't want them. That is not what this campaign is about."

noretreatnosurrender

(1,890 posts)
18. Really?
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 01:35 PM
Mar 2016

What did you expect him to say? Did you really expect him to say they are a Hillary campaign tactic ? Come on, be real.

Response to merrily (Reply #19)

merrily

(45,251 posts)
85. What does your continuing, um, interest in Manny have to do my question about Brock and 2008?
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 05:57 PM
Mar 2016

Gotta tell ya, when you kept posting to ask him where he was going to be on a particular day, that creeped me out, as I posted to you at the time. And now, you post to me about Manny, months after he's been banned, when I ask if Brock worked in Hillary's 2008 campaign. Yikes.

Andy823

(11,495 posts)
86. Actually I asked
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 06:13 PM
Mar 2016

If he was going to be there protesting like he was encouraging others to do at a Clinton event. I would think if he was promoting it he might be there, nothing creepy about asking him that question since we all know he was promoting others to do his work for him.

As for you saying it might be Brock that made this up, I was showing you that Manny was using it before it ever became an issue with Bernie's campaign. I think him calling all of his loyal followers Bernie bros pretty much shows these people DO exist, and they were here on DU back in November.

I have no interest in Manny. I was glad he showed his true colors and was banned.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
14. Good that Sanders recognizes his campaign is attracting some "disgusting" behavior. I wonder why
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 01:31 PM
Mar 2016

that is?

merrily

(45,251 posts)
17. No his campaign is not attracting disgusting behavior, nor is his campaign stirring it or lying
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 01:35 PM
Mar 2016

about the behavior of Hillary supporters.

Wish I could say the same for Hillary's two primary campaigns.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
40. He did NOT call his campaign disgusting or say his campaign was attracting bad behavior.
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 02:30 PM
Mar 2016

And he said what HEARD about was disgusting. His saying behavior is disgusting is NOT the same thing as saying his campaign attracted it. That's totes your spin.

He has millions of supporters. Believe it or not, in any groups of millions of people, some behaved badly, even before Bernie was born, let alone had a campaign. Nothing in the OP says bad behavior is the fault of his campaign.

Read the OP and my post for actual comprehension and then have the basic decency to characterize both honestly. Thanks.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
59. Well, if his some of his supporters are doing it to extent Sanders calls their behavior "disgusting,
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 03:16 PM
Mar 2016

I'd say he is disgusted with the behavior of those supporters who his campaign has attracted.

How ever you wish to parse/spin it, Sanders is speaking out again a significant number of his supporters who are acting disgustingly. Accept it.

 

MaggieD

(7,393 posts)
44. Oh it certainly is
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 02:38 PM
Mar 2016

Sanders is a guy who will sue Wiki for using his campaign logo, but has no problem with his supporters and their "Bern the witch" and "Fuck her" memes.

Honest to dog, I don't think I have ever seen nastier people in politics on the Dem side until this campaign by Bernie. And I hate to break it to you, but I know dozens of actual adults who feel the same way.

There are many reasons he will not win the nomination, but this is certainly one of them.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
61. "Have you heard about this phenomenon, the Berniebro?" CNN's Jake Tapper asked.
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 03:22 PM
Mar 2016

"Yes, I have heard about it. It's disgusting," Sanders replied. "Look, we don't want that crap. . . . . ."

Again, it's obvious he is repulsed by their behavior, enough to say it on CNN. Wish folks who do that "crap" were as disgusted with it.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
64. Why are you wasting your time and mine? That quote does not say his campaign attracted or caused
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 03:45 PM
Mar 2016

this behavior, nor does it contradict any of my posts on this this thread. Nothing you quoted does either of those things. Please stop flailing pointlessly. Thanks.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
65. Well, how the heck did they end up Sanders' supporters? Sanders and the campaign attracted them.
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 03:47 PM
Mar 2016

Similarly Trump's campaign has attracted people who exhibit "disgusting" behavior, only he loves them.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
67. There is a difference between attracting a vote and attracting bad behavior. How about this:
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 03:54 PM
Mar 2016

You're the only one making the claim that Bernie's campaign attracted bad behavior.. You tell me what Bernie's campaign did to attract bad behavior on the part of some of the millions of BErnie supporters. The I will tell you what the Hillary campaign has been doing to attract ugly behavior on the part of Hillary's supporters, in both 2008 and in 2016. Deal?

merrily

(45,251 posts)
71. Apparently, you can't stop falsely claiming he said his campaign attracted bad behavior. He did not.
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 04:19 PM
Mar 2016

As I said three or four posts ago, that's only your spin. You keep falsely claiming he said his campaign attracts bad behavior. Hoever, you haven't backed up a single claim you made. And, no, quoting something that does not say what you claim it says is not backing up your claim. But you just keep repeating it anyway. That's an awful waste of your time and mine, something else I said about four posts ago.



merrily

(45,251 posts)
73. Asked and answered. Dude, please stop wasting your time repeating the same nonsense over and over.
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 04:49 PM
Mar 2016

It's not a good look. And, since it seems to be all you've got, I wish you a pleasant day. The last word that you seem so desperate to get, no matter how meaninglessly, will be yours, if you only repeat yourself again. Go for it!

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
81. The "disgusting" behavior is vile sexism and hateful misogyny.
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 05:25 PM
Mar 2016

Sanders and the campaign attracted them because he is male!

Running against a woman!

Sanders acknowledged they are a problem!

You are correct as usual, Hoyt!


MelissaB

(16,420 posts)
94. "Stop smearing Democrats.
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 08:40 PM
Mar 2016

Be respectful that you're at a site to support Democrats. Take it somewhere else."

Kind of applies here, eh?

 

hellofromreddit

(1,182 posts)
41. All campaigns attract disgusting behavior
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 02:31 PM
Mar 2016

Last edited Sun Mar 20, 2016, 04:08 PM - Edit history (1)

Ratajkowski got severe blowback from people who are obviously not aligned with Sanders when she endorsed him.

What we ask of leaders is that they call out that behavior and work to stop it.

Sanders has called it out, and his staff and many of the supporters work to shut down the vile comments. But people seem to pretend that it doesn't matter. What more is expected?

The berniebro problem is mostly fabricated as a political weapon. It is real, but nowhere near the scale people pretend. The abuse of women on-line has been a massive problem since the BBS days, and it can be seen in all campaigns. It's only that the Clinton campaign right now that is trying to pretend Sanders created it by naming it after him.

edit to add: Another thread has a good example of disgusting behavior.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
56. It's also not only Bernie's supporters. Every time I've posted substance anywhere online
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 02:49 PM
Mar 2016

that is positive to Bernie, I've gotten ad homs immediately and a-plenty from Hillary supporters. And I've seen them on this board and at hillarysupporters. com That's why I am not buying into the self righteous holier than thou.

The main difference between Hillary supporters and Bernie supporters is that her campaign maligns his supporters and coordinates that with Clintonites like Krugman and his campaign does not do the same to her supporters.

griffi94

(3,733 posts)
20. I still like Bernie
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 01:39 PM
Mar 2016

I'm not going to blame him for the behavior of Clinton haters.

I'd guess the really nasty ones aren't even pro Bernie they just really hate Hillary.
Of course a lot of people have been conditioned to hate the Clintons since the 90s.

Some of them are also just zealots much like sports fans and
just can't stand the thought of their "Team" losing. Some are political purists
who like that Bernie is also pure. Of course it's easy to be pure when you're not actually responsible
for results and your main function seems to be offering critiques and commentary as to why both parties suck.

Bernies done a lot of good this political cycle by raising questions and bringing some focus to his issues.

I think I'll focus on the positive things that have come out of his campaign and on the majority
of his supporters who are good people and not the Berniebros, the perpetually disgruntled, the misogynists, or the "If I can't have my way right now then burn it all down".

The primary will be over soon and the raw feelings will fade.



sibelian

(7,804 posts)
23. We got the same thing during the Scottish Independence referendum - "cybernats".
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 01:43 PM
Mar 2016

Anybody posting online in favour of independence was a "cybernat". Rapidly the idea that the Internet was infested with nasty cybernats spread.

Do you get it? "Nationalists" = nat and "Internet" = "cyber". Hence - cybernats! Kind of trips off the tongue, too.

Cybernats! Under the bed! Crawling up through the floorboards! Sleeping with your wife! Stealing your jobs and beating all your high scores on your favourite video games!

It was a PHENOMENON, truly, apparently.

It was not a new experience for me as I've been a "faggot", "shirtlifter", "fudgepacker", "friend of Dorothy" (can't stand Judy Garland, Dinah Washington for me, thanks), "chutney ferret" and so on for a VERY long time, but I think some of my internet compatriots were genuinely taken aback as nothing like that had ever happened to them before.

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
30. Did you read the part...
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 02:12 PM
Mar 2016

where Senator Sanders (I-VT)* called them "disgusting?"

Why would a candidate disavow a "Mythical Beast?"

 

FreakinDJ

(17,644 posts)
32. Clinton used the same Smear Tactics against Obama in 2008
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 02:14 PM
Mar 2016

Remember the Obama Boys ....

It is so classical Rovian I wonder if she hired some one

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
33. What Senator Sanders (I-VT)* says:
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 02:17 PM
Mar 2016
"Look, anybody who is supporting me, is doing sexist things is — we don't want them. I don't want them. That is not what this campaign is about."

He never hesitates to call out the Clinton campaign or Hillary.

Why does he acknowledge Berniebros if Hillary is the source?

Kip Humphrey

(4,753 posts)
35. because he's busy campaign and isn't occupying himself with Hillary crap.
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 02:21 PM
Mar 2016

Grow up, yallerdawg. You know where this all originated as well as I do. Get a life.

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
49. The article identifies where this originated back in October.
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 02:42 PM
Mar 2016
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/10/here-comes-the-berniebro-bernie-sanders/411070/

The Berniebro really isn’t that bad, though. I mean, you maybe support many of Bernie’s policies, and you’re glad he’s pressing Hillary. But why oh why are the Berniebro’s posts always at the top of your Facebook timeline? And why is he writing in that tone? Is the Berniebro talking to his friends or is he declaiming in the Roman forum?

The Berniebro, now that you think about it, was the kind of person who’d show up to a college party in a toga. You remember it maybe being the Berniebro’s profile picture once. (Today, the Berniebro is wearing a blazer in his profile picture, or an open-necked gingham shirt. Or both.)

The Berniebro, though steadfastly a Berniebro now, will not always be such. You can sense this. Soon, maybe already, the Berniebro will become a Schoolboardbro. Or a Municipalparkingbro. Or, heaven help us, a Localhistoricaldistrictzoningrestrictionsbro.

Yet today the Berniebro is still a Berniebro. The Berniebro is #FeelingtheBern. And until Sanders drops out of the race, the Berniebro wants you to #FeeltheBern, too.

I don't want to grow up.

"Toga, toga, toga!"
 

mythology

(9,527 posts)
31. They are the subset of internet trolls
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 02:12 PM
Mar 2016

That attack people, particularly women, online who happen to also be Sanders supporters. They aren't representative of Sanders supporters overall or the Sanders campaign as a whole.

It should be a non-issue. People can be assholes on the internet because they don't have to look the person in the eyes or risk getting punched in the face for it.

Please let this nonsense die.

Billsmile

(404 posts)
36. Movie Line
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 02:22 PM
Mar 2016
"And most recently of all, a "Roman Toga Party" was held from which we have received more than two dozen reports of individual acts of perversion SO profound and disgusting that decorum prohibits listing them here."


Clinton's remarks reminded me of this line from Animal House.
 

MaggieD

(7,393 posts)
42. Bernie would have had a better chance if....
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 02:35 PM
Mar 2016

... so many of his supporters weren't nasty, and hadn't exhibited all the traits that real progressives find disgusting. I don't think he would have won, but so many of his supporters are just such a turn off that many people can't even imagine throwing in with folks like that.

I have never been a Sanders supporter because I have known his MO for over a decade. But I do know many people that have crossed him off their list in large part because of the nastiness of his supporters, which reflects on the culture his campaign has set. It all blurs together at some point.

Gothmog

(144,919 posts)
62. Joan Walsh's article on these attacks was very moving to me
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 03:34 PM
Mar 2016

This is from Joan Walsh's article http://www.thenation.com/article/why-im-supporting-hillary-clinton-with-joy-and-without-apologies/

When I’ve disclosed that my daughter works for Clinton—in The Nation, on MSNBC, and on social media—we’ve both come in for trolling so vile it’s made me not merely defensive of her. It’s forced me to recognize how little society respects the passion of the many young women—and men—who are putting their souls into electing the first female president. It’s one thing to note that Sanders is winning among millennials; that’s true. It’s another to impugn the competence and dignity of the literally millions of millennials who support Clinton. Social-media trolls have had several fascinating and stunningly sexist reactions to the news of my daughter’s position. Obviously, she can’t be competent; I must have gotten her the job (in fact, she got it through a high-school friend who worked for Clinton and recommended her.) Obviously, she can’t think for herself; I must have indoctrinated her to support Clinton over Sanders. Or the flip side: Obviously, I have no integrity, and I support Clinton over Sanders only because my daughter is on her payroll.

Watching people trash your daughter on social media isn’t fun. It got worse when Hillary Clinton’s Twitter account retweeted her, and worse again when she tweeted about Planned Parenthood’s Cecile Richards, a woman she admires, in the wake of the group’s controversial decision to endorse Clinton. It turns out Richards’s daughter works for Clinton as well, and that began a new round of insults to both our daughters. Either they were beneficiaries of our nepotism, or they somehow used their influence to corrupt their dimwit mothers into ignoring Sanders’s obviously superior feminist qualifications. It is interesting to me that none of the ladies—not Clinton, not me nor my daughter, not Richards nor her daughter—are credited with competence or integrity when the Berniebot keyboard warriors break it all down.

The bernie bros are real and their attacks on Walsh's and Richard's daughters were sad
 

CalvinballPro

(1,019 posts)
69. I suspect there's a strong Gamer-Gater faction among Sanders supporters...
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 04:01 PM
Mar 2016

And that's where the "BernieBro" phenomenon originates. I mean, think about it, we're not hearing much different than what we heard when women in the gaming and tech industries began speaking out for equality.

kcr

(15,314 posts)
75. A lot of Bernie Bros have always been the way they are. Basically, internet trolls.
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 05:10 PM
Mar 2016

The sexist and racist ones in particular. They now just hide behind a Bernie avatar so they can titter and play the Who, meee? game because there's no such thing as a Bernie Bro! Look, a giant gif! When the primaries are over, they'll still be who they are, thinking they're just as clever, moving on to something else. Someone somewhere mentioned Gamer Gate. That was another popular movement that attracted a lot of these types. No, not all Bernie supporters or even most, but the ones who are get a lot of attention. They know exactly how to push buttons because they're trolls.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
79. Sure, if you want it. It's actually a .jpg, though, not a gif.
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 05:19 PM
Mar 2016

I'm sorry you don't like it, but you know, everyone's a critic.



ZX86

(1,428 posts)
76. I had a run in with a Bernie Bro today.
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 05:16 PM
Mar 2016

I had just made a deposit at an ATM and a young White guy jumps out of the bushes and starts yelling at me that I'm just a tool of corporate bankers. Then he starts checking me out and says, "You should come down to campaign headquarters. That's where all the hot chicks go that want a little action, if you know what I'm saying". I told him no. I'm not that kind of girl, I'm not going to hell. That made him really mad. He began ranting like a lunatic about Medicare for all and free college. I started to run away but he grabbed my arm and whipped out a knife and said, "Well if you don't want to join us then you'll just have to wear the mark of the Bernie Bros anyway!" and he punched me, cut my face, pushed me down on the ground and ran off.

I swear it's all true and I have a pic to prove it!

/revision/latest?cb=20081025235030

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
80. BERNIEBROS WILTED MY LETTUCE AND GAVE ME RING AROUND THE COLLAR!
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 05:21 PM
Mar 2016

Engine knock and the heartbreak of psoraisis. DAMN YOU BERNIE BROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOS

 

Lazy Daisy

(928 posts)
88. No worries, I got the memo
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 06:25 PM
Mar 2016

I'm a racist, sexist POS who's vote isn't wanted or needed. But please do continue with these posts, just in case others didn't get the memo.

Response to yallerdawg (Original post)

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Who, exactly, are the ‘Be...