Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Joe the Revelator

(14,915 posts)
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 09:37 PM Mar 2016

When did we, as a party, stop asking 'why not?'

I hear you say "Why?" Always "Why?" You see things; and you say "Why?" But I dream things that never were; and I say "Why not?"
-George Benard Shaw, used as a speech closer by this man:




Throughout this campaign, and again today, I have read posts referring to progressive ideas as 'unicorns' and 'sparkleponies' and not being 'realistic'.

What the hell has happened to us as a party?

Why are we embracing the idea that the status quo is good enough? Why are we accepting of the idea that we have gone far enough, and now is a time for pragmatism and capitulation?

How have we gone from being the dreamers, to being the assholes who just ask 'why'?

I don't understand the complete dismissal of PROGRESSIVE ideas at all.

62 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
When did we, as a party, stop asking 'why not?' (Original Post) Joe the Revelator Mar 2016 OP
The enthusiasm killing whys are coming from the conservative wing of the party. Ed Suspicious Mar 2016 #1
They are lazy RobertEarl Mar 2016 #5
K&R Carolina Mar 2016 #2
I've read posts where Sanders was compared to Jesus, MLK, FDR, JFK, Ghandi, and now RFK... MohRokTah Mar 2016 #3
You miss the point time after time. Its pretty amazing. Joe the Revelator Mar 2016 #10
You cannot miss a point when there is none... MohRokTah Mar 2016 #12
My op doesn't even mention Sanders. Read it a couple more times. Joe the Revelator Mar 2016 #16
I read it and I got what yoou are saying and it CRACKED ME THE FUCK UP!!!! MohRokTah Mar 2016 #18
I guess posting smileys is your way of avoiding the issue Mnpaul Mar 2016 #35
I think those that do, see his optomistic views as a reminder of what the party once was casperthegm Mar 2016 #11
Post removed Post removed Mar 2016 #13
what is his reward for grifting? noiretextatique Mar 2016 #21
Money for his 2018 Senate re-election MohRokTah Mar 2016 #22
do you ever post any proof to back-up your absurd claims? noiretextatique Mar 2016 #38
Disagree casperthegm Mar 2016 #25
You CRACK ME THE FUCK UP!!!! MohRokTah Mar 2016 #26
now that's a rebuttal fit for a HRC supporter casperthegm Mar 2016 #28
Post removed Post removed Mar 2016 #29
only you see comparisons noiretextatique Mar 2016 #15
Post removed Post removed Mar 2016 #17
yeah...Bernie will have an affair and a love child noiretextatique Mar 2016 #24
im sorry you said that. reddread Mar 2016 #32
at least this thread is safe noiretextatique Mar 2016 #39
13 hidden posts on his transparency page. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #43
unhinged, finally noiretextatique Mar 2016 #48
So did I! beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #49
I spend some time over at discussionist rufus dog Mar 2016 #56
Bernie is waking Democrats up, at the rate of about 4-5% per month! reformist2 Mar 2016 #4
It is amazing RobertEarl Mar 2016 #8
Because when he was fund raising for Bill, Rahm was given the definitive answer HereSince1628 Mar 2016 #6
Thank you! H2O Man Mar 2016 #7
someone is asking those questions... grasswire Mar 2016 #9
I Understand The Reason noretreatnosurrender Mar 2016 #14
The "Why Bother?" Party Armstead Mar 2016 #19
because hill2016 Mar 2016 #20
Thanks for proving the point! Joe the Revelator Mar 2016 #23
YOU don't want to. The Velveteen Ocelot Mar 2016 #27
unicorns are mythical creatures, like benevolent billionaires noiretextatique Mar 2016 #41
we can pay for conservative unicorns like forjusticethunders Mar 2016 #58
Why do you suppose the math works noamnety Mar 2016 #61
late 63, mid 68 reddread Mar 2016 #30
in any matter where your fucking juvenile response won't work... islandmkl Mar 2016 #31
Why not make promises you can't keep? redstateblues Mar 2016 #33
or..why not make TWO (or more) promises that are diametrically opposed.. islandmkl Mar 2016 #36
Typical Hillary fanatic BULLSHIT. BillZBubb Mar 2016 #46
He's made very few promises. He has put out a platform of things that should happen... highprincipleswork Mar 2016 #54
Most people understand if you can't get everything you try for Bettie Mar 2016 #60
I don't really know MuseRider Mar 2016 #34
This is interesting: chervilant Mar 2016 #37
Oh my! Took a minute because I couldn't figure out who the ... ebayfool Mar 2016 #62
We're the Can't Do It Country Dems to Win Mar 2016 #40
We are the only thing standing in our way. Joe the Revelator Mar 2016 #42
When a party moves right, it starts to resist government change and likes the security of status quo EndElectoral Mar 2016 #44
With the rise of the DLC. BillZBubb Mar 2016 #45
More important is "how?" nt geek tragedy Mar 2016 #47
My first vote was in 72, never in a million years did I think Kissinger would be evoked as a model EndElectoral Mar 2016 #50
1992 (nt) jeff47 Mar 2016 #51
I think the slide began in 1968, but didn't really become part of the identity of the party Beowulf Mar 2016 #52
When Al From's DLC/ Third Way took over the Democratic Party in the late 80s. senz Mar 2016 #53
When is enough enough? My thought.. Joe the Revelator Mar 2016 #57
I sent this one in a text today rufus dog Mar 2016 #55
Lowering expections Hydra Mar 2016 #59
 

Joe the Revelator

(14,915 posts)
16. My op doesn't even mention Sanders. Read it a couple more times.
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 09:56 PM
Mar 2016

and realize i'm talking about PROGRESSIVE ideas.

Mnpaul

(3,655 posts)
35. I guess posting smileys is your way of avoiding the issue
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 10:27 PM
Mar 2016

this must mean that either the subject is too deep for you or that no one has provided an answer for you. Hopefully, some day you will mature to the point where you can engage in rational discussion without this childish behavior.

casperthegm

(643 posts)
11. I think those that do, see his optomistic views as a reminder of what the party once was
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 09:51 PM
Mar 2016

and could be again. He may not accomplish all of his goals but at least he's willing to try and fight for us. Feel free to disagree. But I don't see a whole lot of inspired thinking by HRC.

Of course the counter argument from the HRC folks is that Sanders is selling pie in the sky ideas that have no chance of becoming reality. First, not true, particularly if Americans go to the polls and demand change by voting for it. This is a grass roots effort and it's about everyone. Second, like I said, even if not everything can be done, it's certainly better than a status quo future that continues HRC's vision; fracking, money from corporate America and Wall Street, no Glass Steagall, no college for everyone, more approval of trade agreements like NAFTA and the TPP. Is that vision for the future? Nope. It's not even what I'd call Democratic values.

Response to casperthegm (Reply #11)

noiretextatique

(27,275 posts)
21. what is his reward for grifting?
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 09:59 PM
Mar 2016

i think you are projecting: the clintons are millonaires, not bernie. they will be even richer if hillary wins.

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
22. Money for his 2018 Senate re-election
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 10:01 PM
Mar 2016

and a salary for his wife for the next eight years to stay on as a campaign staffer.

Grifters gonna grift.

noiretextatique

(27,275 posts)
38. do you ever post any proof to back-up your absurd claims?
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 11:00 PM
Mar 2016

NONE of you ever do, then you whine about Clinton being "bashed" constantly so: Where is your proof? I found a few articles comparing Sanders to Edwards. Obama was a centrist, like Clinton, and if Edwards would have stayed in the race, he would have been the most progressive candidate. But, there wasn't as much distance between Obama, Clinton and Edwards as there is between Sanders and Clinton: Bernie is the progressive candidate in this race. I don't what that means to you,
but it certainly does not support your claims. Bernie is to to the left of Edwards, and he is still a viable candidate.

casperthegm

(643 posts)
25. Disagree
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 10:05 PM
Mar 2016

But we are all entitled to our opinions. Since you've offered your comparison I'm trying to think of a politician to compare HRC to. A moderate republican would be a good match I think. Now, before you think this is just s smear comment, allow me to list for you the right-leaning beliefs and actions of your candidate;

She supports fracking. Is this really where we are going as party?

Clinton’s position on Keystone (or lack of one). She waited until the same week that Obama made his decision before announcing where she stood. That's not standing up for the environment. That's politics.

Wall Street money. Whether it's impression or reality, it's there and it can't help but make me wonder. Generally speaking, it's hard to imagine the banks and Wall Street throwing all of that money at her and saying "here you go, we don't expect anything in return." By the way, how is that search for the transcripts going?

Her opposition to Glass Stegall. Though I do recall her telling the banks to "cut it out."

Her Iraq vote. You may be sick of hearing about it but it's a big deal. It was poor judgement and lack of foresight. Sanders saw that it would destabilize the region. And it did. Now we not have the legacy of the Iraq war, we have the current ISIS situation.

Speaking of that, there is the no-fly zone proposal. Another poor foreign policy decision. What happens when Russian jets cross that line? You have to be prepared for that and I don't see it. Fortunately, it looks like Russia is pulling their aircraft out, but it's just another example of what that "experience" has gotten us.

The email and server investigation by the FBI. Sorry, it's real. It very well could end up being nothing in the end, but what if it's not? What if it drags on until the general election and then she gets indicted? Then you end up with a republican in the White House.

Gay marriage. You can see how she has flip flopped over the years, as confirmed via politifact. Another change based on the political winds.

Her support of the TPP

Her double down on the auto bailout lie. Her Koch brothers smear. Her one issue candidate smear.

These are facts that stand in stark contrast with her opponent and in my opinion should have no place in the values of the Democratic party.

casperthegm

(643 posts)
28. now that's a rebuttal fit for a HRC supporter
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 10:16 PM
Mar 2016

I always appreciate how HRC supporters can offer such insightful counter-points. Geez, sometimes this is so easy it's not even fair.

Response to casperthegm (Reply #28)

noiretextatique

(27,275 posts)
15. only you see comparisons
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 09:55 PM
Mar 2016

i see people posting the quotes of great thinkers who share the same values as Bernie, and all except Jesus, were Democrats. it's telling that you find that so funny.

Response to noiretextatique (Reply #15)

noiretextatique

(27,275 posts)
24. yeah...Bernie will have an affair and a love child
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 10:03 PM
Mar 2016
that's quite the delusion you have going. edwards was nothing like bernie, and vice versa.
 

rufus dog

(8,419 posts)
56. I spend some time over at discussionist
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 01:29 AM
Mar 2016

In every thread I post I get the same smilies as a response.

reformist2

(9,841 posts)
4. Bernie is waking Democrats up, at the rate of about 4-5% per month!
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 09:42 PM
Mar 2016

It's not as fast a reawakening as I'd like, but it is happening. And it's happening just fast enough to win Bernie the nomination.

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
8. It is amazing
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 09:46 PM
Mar 2016

Against so much establishmentarianism Bernie is awakening the true spirit of American democracy.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
6. Because when he was fund raising for Bill, Rahm was given the definitive answer
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 09:43 PM
Mar 2016

by the financiers who said "Because we will cut off all donations to your campaign."

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
9. someone is asking those questions...
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 09:47 PM
Mar 2016

...so the progressive ideas are not completely dismissed. Bernie is introducing that mindset to a whole new generation of Americans.

Someone keeps trying to beat him down.

noretreatnosurrender

(1,890 posts)
14. I Understand The Reason
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 09:53 PM
Mar 2016

for the Clinton campaign to dismiss progressive ideas and our Party's long glorious past but what's most disturbing is that some of the supporters of Clinton are buying into it. It saddens me. We are at a very important crossroads in this election. We actually have the opportunity to reclaim those progressive values and yet some of us not only do not recognize it but make fun of those of us who do. I wonder what they will tell their grandchildren about their participation at this seminal moment in history?

noiretextatique

(27,275 posts)
41. unicorns are mythical creatures, like benevolent billionaires
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 11:26 PM
Mar 2016

who give money to policians, and expect nothing at all in return. the math doesn't work because there are no mtyhical creatures: just a corrupt system, with some corrupt politicians who have convinced you that government, supported by your tax dollars, cannot, and must not, work in your best interests.

 

forjusticethunders

(1,151 posts)
58. we can pay for conservative unicorns like
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 08:28 AM
Mar 2016

- massive tax cuts (and quasilegal tax evasion) for the rich
- bloated military budgets
- massive drug wars

but we can never pay for liberal "unicorns" like universal health care, education and good jobs.

good to know Zombie Reagan is still winning.

islandmkl

(5,275 posts)
31. in any matter where your fucking juvenile response won't work...
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 10:21 PM
Mar 2016

smilie the shit out of it...

note: i would have posted this in response to a single post...but i was somewhat overwhelmed...

yeah, I'm talking to you MRT...at least my response actually addresses something you posted...as opposed to your posts...

if, for some reason, you think this is an unwarranted 'attack' on you personally...well, that figures...

redstateblues

(10,565 posts)
33. Why not make promises you can't keep?
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 10:24 PM
Mar 2016

It gets a lot of votes from certain naive segments of the electorate. If you win and then when you can't deliver you blame it on all the straw men -oligarchs, neolibs, third wayers, etc ad infinitum. In Bernie world it's always somebody else's fault. He's been in Congress for 24 years. He has been part of the establishment.

islandmkl

(5,275 posts)
36. or..why not make TWO (or more) promises that are diametrically opposed..
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 10:36 PM
Mar 2016

and, most likely, keep neither one, or any, of them?

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
46. Typical Hillary fanatic BULLSHIT.
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 12:01 AM
Mar 2016

Bernie isn't promising ANYTHING except to FIGHT for certain goals. He knows, and his supporters know, he can't do it by himself. That's why we need a political revolution.

Maybe if you actually paid attention instead of posting nonsense, you would know that.

 

highprincipleswork

(3,111 posts)
54. He's made very few promises. He has put out a platform of things that should happen...
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 01:15 AM
Mar 2016

if we are to have a better country.

Don't you think he's in the right direction, about what would make this a better country?

Think you could join and work on it, or is shitting on it because it's not currently "real" the better way to go?

Bettie

(16,068 posts)
60. Most people understand if you can't get everything you try for
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 09:57 PM
Mar 2016

the problem comes when people say "I'm not even going to try".

For example: when someone says that they will include, say, a public option in a health care bill and drops that at the first sign of resistance to it. That feels like a betrayal, because there is no fight there, just an admission that there was never an intent to truly try for it. (And no, I'm not saying President Obama is terrible, I'm saying I was disappointed that he didn't put up any kind of a fight for a public option. On that issue, I am disappointed in him.)

The point is having someone who will advocate on behalf of those of us who aren't millionaires and billionaires, who will fight for us, instead of saving their fighting spirit for corporate persons and those who get rich off of the labor of those lower on the economic ladder than they are.

I'm tired of hearing "we can't even try". Hope and change has turned to "sit down and shut up".

chervilant

(8,267 posts)
37. This is interesting:
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 10:38 PM
Mar 2016
On Tue Mar 22, 2016, 02:27 AM an alert was sent on the following post:

No way does Snders share these values.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1547516

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

Calling Sen Sanders a grifter is over-the-top, it's time to tone down the rhetoric, both candidates are far better than the alternative.

JURY RESULTS

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Tue Mar 22, 2016, 02:33 AM, and the Jury voted 6-1 to HIDE IT.

Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: As a Bernie supporter, I cringe when I see these kinds of comments. However, the vile name-calling is going in both directions here on DU, and I cannot see a TOS violation in this comment. The DUer who made this comment might want to note that s/he is on my IL, and might want to add me to her/his jury blacklist, JIC.

(P. S. GO BERNIE!!!)
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: How is it that an obvious troll like MohRocTah is still allowed to post here?
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.


I cannot see most of the responses to your OP, because I've successfully added almost every Hi11ary supporter to my IL. (It's likely apparent that I was Juror #3. The DUer who earned this hide has long been on my IL, way before this primary season.)

ebayfool

(3,411 posts)
62. Oh my! Took a minute because I couldn't figure out who the ...
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 10:15 PM
Mar 2016

alert was about. We have similar ignore lists, apparently!

 

Dems to Win

(2,161 posts)
40. We're the Can't Do It Country
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 11:25 PM
Mar 2016

Can't build our own bridges, Can't build our own train cars, Can't have Universal Health Care.

EndElectoral

(4,213 posts)
44. When a party moves right, it starts to resist government change and likes the security of status quo
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 11:54 PM
Mar 2016

But that faux security is an illusion.

It's the worst I've seen it. Why Obama's campaign started with such excitement with the simple slogan, "Yes, We Can!" Now, it has become, "No, we can't." It's gone from Obama "Hope and Change" to "The Pragmatic Grown Up".

Vision and Idealism have become "childish." Not realistic. There are too many reasons why it can't be done.

Just be grateful for the little you can get in such a divided government.

I really think this is what Bernie is talking about by a political revolution. This entropy of the party toward inertia is why so many are having a hard time supporting the Establishment candidate, and many who are doing so are doing so out of loyalty - the old lesser of two evils vote- not, damn, that's a leader, that's exciting, that's what needs to happen and will happen by God because it's right.

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
45. With the rise of the DLC.
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 11:59 PM
Mar 2016

There whole purpose was to make the Democratic party more "business friendly"--ie use republican philosophy when addressing economic subjects. It spelled the end of progressive policies.

Now it is easy for a Democratic frontrunner to use the long established republican line "who's going to pay for these giveaways?" to kill any meaningful government programs--even programs that were at the core of the party's agenda for over half a century. The party has moved so far to the right as to be unrecognizable.

EndElectoral

(4,213 posts)
50. My first vote was in 72, never in a million years did I think Kissinger would be evoked as a model
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 12:24 AM
Mar 2016

to learn from by a Democrat running for President.

That's how far it's changed.

Beowulf

(761 posts)
52. I think the slide began in 1968, but didn't really become part of the identity of the party
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 12:57 AM
Mar 2016

until 1988. Jesse Jackson's bid (Keep Hope Alive) had been vanquished and the Dukakis' message was competence.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
53. When Al From's DLC/ Third Way took over the Democratic Party in the late 80s.
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 01:10 AM
Mar 2016

The DLC/ Third Way is anti-progressive.

 

Joe the Revelator

(14,915 posts)
57. When is enough enough? My thought..
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 07:37 AM
Mar 2016

is after Hillary loses to Trump, we have a battle for the soul of the party.

 

rufus dog

(8,419 posts)
55. I sent this one in a text today
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 01:27 AM
Mar 2016

Preceded by a request to google "why does Rice play Texas"

Similar thoughts as yours, my text ended with "fifty years later we have Clinton and Trump.

It is very sad.

What started the whole thing was my daughter sending out a text regarding the Bernie rally she attended yesterday. She took a bit of grief, rather than responding to each slam of Bernie I directed them to the JFK speech followed by the RFK quote. Thankfully it shut the thing down, my next response was going to be the full page ad in the Dallas paper slamming JFK for being a Socialist on the day he was murdered with a comment, the hate never ends.

Hydra

(14,459 posts)
59. Lowering expections
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 07:52 PM
Mar 2016

Which is a horrible way to run a campaign.

"I'm giving you guys nothing. NOTHING. All my big donors will get a slice of the pie, but you will vote for me...or else..."

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»When did we, as a party, ...