Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

DLnyc

(2,479 posts) Tue Mar 22, 2016, 11:38 PM Mar 2016

0

Times has AZ as 1 pct out of 724 in Maricopa, rest "initial results"

So that % lead for Hilary doesn't seem necessarily that solid.

Anybody know where there are more complete results?

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Times has AZ as 1 pct out of 724 in Maricopa, rest "initial results" (Original Post) DLnyc Mar 2016 OP

i am confused as well TheSocialDem Mar 2016 #1

Arizona Secretary of State brooklynite Mar 2016 #2

It is a conspiracy MadBadger Mar 2016 #3

They are the early/absentee ballots alcibiades_mystery Mar 2016 #4

I think that's got to be an error one way or the other. revbones Mar 2016 #5

My guess is that is early and/or absentee DLnyc Mar 2016 #7

Hmm. Now the Times has 241 out of 724 in Mar. and STILL 180,000 DLnyc Mar 2016 #9

Here's the Arizona Secretary of State site EmperorHasNoClothes Mar 2016 #6

People STILL IN LINE Waiting To Vote...Have been Waiting For HOURS! AzDar Mar 2016 #8

TheSocialDem

(191 posts)

1. i am confused as well

Reply to DLnyc (Original post)

Tue Mar 22, 2016, 11:40 PM

Mar 2016

seeing the same thing

brooklynite

(94,358 posts)

2. Arizona Secretary of State

Reply to DLnyc (Original post)

Tue Mar 22, 2016, 11:41 PM

Mar 2016

http://apps.azsos.gov/election/2016/PPE/Results/PPE2016Results.htm

MadBadger

(24,089 posts)

3. It is a conspiracy

Reply to DLnyc (Original post)

Tue Mar 22, 2016, 11:41 PM

Mar 2016

duh

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)

4. They are the early/absentee ballots

Reply to DLnyc (Original post)

Tue Mar 22, 2016, 11:42 PM

Mar 2016

The problem for Sanders is that he is behind by 76,000 votes in absentee and early voting, and that constitutes a full 30% of registered Democrats. So, the question is, will he win the remainder of the registered Democrats 61%-39% in order to even the ass-kicking he received in early voting. The AP and CNN - who have exit polls - do not think so. Will the lead stay as lop-sided as it is now? Probably not. Will Sanders win? Deeply unlikely.

revbones

(3,660 posts)

5. I think that's got to be an error one way or the other.

Reply to DLnyc (Original post)

Tue Mar 22, 2016, 11:44 PM

Mar 2016

That would be 180,000+ votes from a single precinct if the 1 in 724 was correct.

DLnyc

(2,479 posts)

7. My guess is that is early and/or absentee

Reply to revbones (Reply #5)

Tue Mar 22, 2016, 11:52 PM

Mar 2016

the wider vote may have a different margin, it seems to me.

DLnyc

(2,479 posts)

9. Hmm. Now the Times has 241 out of 724 in Mar. and STILL 180,000

Reply to revbones (Reply #5)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 12:28 AM

Mar 2016

185,000 now, to be exact. Weird, non-sensical numbers, to me.

EmperorHasNoClothes

(4,797 posts)

6. Here's the Arizona Secretary of State site

Reply to DLnyc (Original post)

Tue Mar 22, 2016, 11:48 PM

Mar 2016

http://apps.azsos.gov/election/2016/PPE/Results/PPE2016Results.htm

Very confusing how the results are coming in tonight.

AzDar

(14,023 posts)

8. People STILL IN LINE Waiting To Vote...Have been Waiting For HOURS!

Reply to DLnyc (Original post)

Tue Mar 22, 2016, 11:54 PM

Mar 2016

https://twitter.com/shivani_112/status/712486002628141057

Reply to this discussion

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Times has AZ as 1 pct out...